Home Page link

Cat.5 Tornado-Proof houses

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Cat.5 Tornado-Proof houses George Orwell 05-06-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by George Orwell on May 6, 2007, 11:41 pm
Greensburg, Kansas just got wiped out. There is need in the tornado-belt
for tornado-proof houses. I think it can be done and done cost affordably.

The grain elevator survived. It is a cylinderical concrete structure.
That is a clue.

The specs for this new type dwelling is Cat.5 and grapefruit size hail
protection level 100% with only "paint damage" allowable. In fair weather,
it should provide attractive, comfortable and economical living for a
family of six. Larger and smaller models would follow.

A cylinder topped with a dome like a nuclear reactor containment might
work. Another approach is a three sided pyramidal structure, made of
reinforced concrete. A sphere on a low pedestal is another design.

Such a building design could be tested in a wind tunnel after being
mathematically evaluated by structural engineers. It would be build on site
in huge inverted molds, using factory-preformed steel reinforcement and
poured. Then, the cured structure would be hoisted by crane and bolted to
a well-anchored slab foundation. Windows would be equipped with steel
storm shutters and the garage would be built into the North side with 3
block walls forming the auto storage space. A steel roll-up door would
protect the garage opening.

The object is to build for not exceeding a $5 per sq. ft. premium. Lowered
insurance costs and a government stipend of about $1,000 a year to owners
willing to open up their dwelling to neighors for shelter in tornado
attacks would substidize the additional cost of acquisition.

The government could be convinced to underwrite the R & D of this project
to a 50% level. We need a small team of about 20 to do this: architect,
engineer, lobbyist, patent attorney, contractors, real estate developers
and so forth. The project should begin at Greensburg.


Posted by Scott Cox on May 8, 2007, 9:22 am
Have a look at geodesic dome houses like www.aidomes.com . They cite
examples of Florida built geodesic domes surviving hurricanes while
neighboring stick-framed houses vanished.





> Greensburg, Kansas just got wiped out. There is need in the tornado-belt
> for tornado-proof houses. I think it can be done and done cost
> affordably.
>
> The grain elevator survived. It is a cylinderical concrete structure.
> That is a clue.
>
> The specs for this new type dwelling is Cat.5 and grapefruit size hail
> protection level 100% with only "paint damage" allowable. In fair
> weather,
> it should provide attractive, comfortable and economical living for a
> family of six. Larger and smaller models would follow.
>
> A cylinder topped with a dome like a nuclear reactor containment might
> work. Another approach is a three sided pyramidal structure, made of
> reinforced concrete. A sphere on a low pedestal is another design.
>
> Such a building design could be tested in a wind tunnel after being
> mathematically evaluated by structural engineers. It would be build on
> site
> in huge inverted molds, using factory-preformed steel reinforcement and
> poured. Then, the cured structure would be hoisted by crane and bolted to
> a well-anchored slab foundation. Windows would be equipped with steel
> storm shutters and the garage would be built into the North side with 3
> block walls forming the auto storage space. A steel roll-up door would
> protect the garage opening.
>
> The object is to build for not exceeding a $5 per sq. ft. premium.
> Lowered
> insurance costs and a government stipend of about $1,000 a year to owners
> willing to open up their dwelling to neighors for shelter in tornado
> attacks would substidize the additional cost of acquisition.
>
> The government could be convinced to underwrite the R & D of this project
> to a 50% level. We need a small team of about 20 to do this: architect,
> engineer, lobbyist, patent attorney, contractors, real estate developers
> and so forth. The project should begin at Greensburg.
>



Posted by aaron on May 9, 2007, 6:29 am
> It would be build on site
> in huge inverted molds,
>

huge inverted molds sound impractical

perhaps consider the old inflatable dome form? see:
http://www.domtec.com/process.html
can't beat a dome structurally. if FRC concrete isn't strong enough
(cheap enough to make strong...) it might be cheap to get structural
steel curved in large quantity (all of it would be the radius of the
dome) to make a steel support frame that could be installed after
concreting.

it would probably be easy to chainsaw out openings for doors and windows
as necessary.

I am probably under-qualified to give structural advice for the project
(no license) but i would be interested to see where it goes.

Similar ThreadsPosted
18 Very Strange Houses October 3, 2007, 9:55 am
Re: Tiny Houses May 5, 2006, 11:27 am
Re: Tiny Houses May 5, 2006, 3:12 pm
Re: Tiny Houses May 5, 2006, 6:17 pm
Tiny Houses May 5, 2006, 8:03 am
Houses built by robots are in the works. January 21, 2007, 9:47 am
Houses of the Future Could Be Made from Trash April 3, 2007, 8:07 pm
Timber Framed Houses of Essex FA April 24, 2006, 6:15 pm
FA Monmouthshire medieval houses vintage architecture November 19, 2007, 10:32 am
FA Small Family Houses architecture arcihtects plans 1924 October 21, 2007, 4:48 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap