|
Posted by ++ on February 1, 2008, 1:57 pm
Warm Worm wrote:
>>
>> It only works so far. You can sample music but you cannot totally
>> replicate it.
>
>
> From what is understood, it can nevertheless be modeled, or sampled
> and then re-synthesized.
> How you choose to regard an instrument-model is up to you I suppose,
> but the thing with electronics, is that it can also do things with
> models that simply can't be done with the real things.
> And then there are models of instruments that don't even exist in
> reality, as well as other forms of synthesis and parametric control.
>
>> It is also difficult to consistently produce so-called "oriental"
>> interval values and non standard (not divisible by 2 or 3) rhythms.
>> Sure you can program those rhythms for a while, but then you have to
>> be able to mix them with standard rhythms for parts of pieces.
>
>
> I suspect that anything that's possible in reality is possible with
> the computer, and much more.
> Someone once suggested that, to be able to hear a synthetic sound, one
> is limited by the output, which can degrade the sound-quality; whereas
> an acoustic instrument is more direct to the ear.
> While that seems to be true, it may one day be possible to bypass the
> ear-drum, or most or all of the ear in order to "hear" electronic
> music more directly.
>
I heard but cannot point you to research in precisely that brian
oriented hearing to by pass the eardrum for the deaf. Let us hope the
daywill come in which we can all enhance our ability to hear things we
cannot now hear.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap