|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on February 11, 2007, 4:04 pm
> Well, as some of you know, I currently do graphic design, however, I
> also have Autocad, as well as clients and potential clients, including
> those who I've designed furniture for, interested in my doing
> architectural designwork for them over time-- in foreign countries
> too-- certainly an attractive, and even romantic notion.
>
> I also feel dissatisfied with the lack of concreteness, intangeability
> or impracticality of flat graphic design in general, versus
> architectural in specific. I prefer my designs to exist beyond the
> flat or the virtual. I also like the idea of a kind of independence,
> insofar as knowing how a house is put together, and being able to
> build one.
>
> I have also been interested forever in alternative and green
> architecture and sources of energy, such as solar and wind, as well of
> course as a general interest in architecture (ie., been here on
> alt.arch for over 4 years), and my aptitudes (and old aptitude tests)
> consistently have it among the highest on the list.
>
> Since I already have Autocad, I suspect that courses specifically
> dealing with architecture, rather than software, would be preferrable,
> although, I suppose I could learn it on the job if I was to get one
> more easily with extra software skills.
> As for a full-blown degree in architecture, I suppose that's possible,
> too, but for now, it's one thing at a time. :)
In that case I would learn everything I can about building buildings.
--
MichaelB
www.michaelbulatovich.ca
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap