Home Page link

Current Projects

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Current Projects Aesthete 07-05-2007
|--> Re: Current Projects Michael Bulatov...07-06-2007
---> Re: Current Projects =?ISO-8859-1?Q?...07-06-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 7, 2007, 2:16 pm
Don wrote:
> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>> Don wrote:
>>> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>>>> Sure why not, and my design calls for two of them.
>>>> You, yourself, might even be inspired by it enough to attempt one of
>>>> your own.
>>>> I expect mine to be clean and contemporary, with a good amount of glass
>>>> and balance other materials, like wood, metal and stone, and with the
>>>> finished "containers" hardly showing, and/or while transcending their
>>>> original intent.
>>> Rico will remember this.
>>> A few years ago I bought some of them cheap stamped out metal brackets
>>> for making sawhorses quickly.
>>> I jammmed some 2x4's in em and nailed one across the top but it was real
>>> flimsy.
>>> So I ran a slew of nails through the brackets into the 2x4's hoping to
>>> make them stronger.
>>> Only marginally.
>>> Anyway, I did this and I did that and I did this again, boards, brackets,
>>> screws, nails and bolts were flying until I had a pair of $50 sawhorses.
>>> I went the long way around.
>>> I tried to save a buck but it cost me $50.
>>>
>>> shipping container = sawhorse brackets
>>>
>>> They both seem cheap upfront, because they are.
>>> And neither are anywhere close to doing the required job.
>> Your example seems to dovetail poorly, but, point taken at any rate, and
>> maybe I'll be doomed to find out for myself. :)
>>
>> But I do know there're many more people and architects experimenting with
>> shipping containers since I first proposed it about 4 years ago.
>> They are "just raw material".
>>
>> Anyway, talk to me again about it when I get going on it-- assuming we're
>> still around.
>
> I'll be around.
> Reminds me of a Richard Prior thing I saw long ago.
> He said:
> 'Def came knockin' on my door one night. I opened the door and kicked def
> square in his ass'. LOL
>
> This is the thing about the *home shows* and *glossy rags* that I hate.
> They make people, that don't know any better, believe things are other than
> what they are.
> Way back when you first mentioned the shipping container thing I looked into
> it and found what I suspected.
> Hot air.
> Hot air inflated with fluffy text and glossy pix of silliness.
>
> By the time you do all the things necessary to make a shipping container be
> what you want it to be you will have spent 4x as much resources as using
> conventional materials and methods.
> There's a reason why there is so many *ranch* style homes about, constructed
> of 2x4's and roof trusses and vinyl siding.
> They are cheap, fast, and they work.
>
> Alternative construction practices are generally much more expensive than
> conventional stuff, in all ways.
>

Then let it be so... You can't warn or teach a kid about everything.
They have to learn some things on their own. And learning from one's own
trials and tribulations can also make a more enriching learning
experience and help contribute to greater wisdom and take something like
a shipping container to new levels not otherwise considered.

There's an idea floating around somewhere out there that suggests that
allowing conventional wisdom to rule can corrupt thinking and creativity.

In any case, I'd concern myself more with tracts and tracts and tracts
and tracts of cookie-cutter-cutter-cut-cut-cutter "developer" housing
than some guy like me who wants to make a one-off. ;P :)

Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 8, 2007, 2:16 pm
Don wrote:
>> Don wrote:
>>> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>>>>>> Sure why not, and my design calls for two of them.
>>>>>> You, yourself, might even be inspired by it enough to attempt one of
>>>>>> your own.
>>>>>> I expect mine to be clean and contemporary, with a good amount of
>>>>>> glass and balance other materials, like wood, metal and stone, and
>>>>>> with the finished "containers" hardly showing, and/or while
>>>>>> transcending their original intent.
>>>>> Rico will remember this.
>>>>> A few years ago I bought some of them cheap stamped out metal brackets
>>>>> for making sawhorses quickly.
>>>>> I jammmed some 2x4's in em and nailed one across the top but it was
>>>>> real flimsy.
>>>>> So I ran a slew of nails through the brackets into the 2x4's hoping to
>>>>> make them stronger.
>>>>> Only marginally.
>>>>> Anyway, I did this and I did that and I did this again, boards,
>>>>> brackets, screws, nails and bolts were flying until I had a pair of $50
>>>>> sawhorses.
>>>>> I went the long way around.
>>>>> I tried to save a buck but it cost me $50.
>>>>>
>>>>> shipping container = sawhorse brackets
>>>>>
>>>>> They both seem cheap upfront, because they are.
>>>>> And neither are anywhere close to doing the required job.
>>>> Your example seems to dovetail poorly, but, point taken at any rate, and
>>>> maybe I'll be doomed to find out for myself. :)
>>>>
>>>> But I do know there're many more people and architects experimenting
>>>> with shipping containers since I first proposed it about 4 years ago.
>>>> They are "just raw material".
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, talk to me again about it when I get going on it-- assuming
>>>> we're still around.
>>> I'll be around.
>>> Reminds me of a Richard Prior thing I saw long ago.
>>> He said:
>>> 'Def came knockin' on my door one night. I opened the door and kicked def
>>> square in his ass'. LOL
>>>
>>> This is the thing about the *home shows* and *glossy rags* that I hate.
>>> They make people, that don't know any better, believe things are other
>>> than what they are.
>>> Way back when you first mentioned the shipping container thing I looked
>>> into it and found what I suspected.
>>> Hot air.
>>> Hot air inflated with fluffy text and glossy pix of silliness.
>>>
>>> By the time you do all the things necessary to make a shipping container
>>> be what you want it to be you will have spent 4x as much resources as
>>> using conventional materials and methods.
>>> There's a reason why there is so many *ranch* style homes about,
>>> constructed of 2x4's and roof trusses and vinyl siding.
>>> They are cheap, fast, and they work.
>>>
>>> Alternative construction practices are generally much more expensive than
>>> conventional stuff, in all ways.
>>>
>> Then let it be so... You can't warn or teach a kid about everything. They
>> have to learn some things on their own. And learning from one's own trials
>> and tribulations can also make a more enriching learning experience and
>> help contribute to greater wisdom and take something like a shipping
>> container to new levels not otherwise considered.
>>
>> There's an idea floating around somewhere out there that suggests that
>> allowing conventional wisdom to rule can corrupt thinking and creativity.
>>
>> In any case, I'd concern myself more with tracts and tracts and tracts and
>> tracts of cookie-cutter-cutter-cut-cut-cutter "developer" housing than
>> some guy like me who wants to make a one-off. ;P :)
>
> I guess at the bottom line it all depends, firstly, on where one will do it.
> I'm a long time inhabitant of society and it will take me a long time to
> adjust to the extreme lack of rules and supervision that exist here in Brown
> county.
> You could plop a shipping container or 50 on your property around here and
> nobody would pay it any mind at all.
> In Cape Coral, FL, where I'm from, you'd never get across the county line,
> er, state line, with the thing.
>
> Here, you could sit the thing on your land, prop the corner with a rock to
> level it, move on in, and over the course of time create your dream home as
> money and attitude allowed.
> No one would bother you and you wouldn't be restricted by nosey asses bent
> on telling you what you could or couldn't do, or how YOUR behavior on YOUR
> land *might* effect their property values.
> In Cape Coral the numerous levels of building permits and all the stuff that
> goes with it would stop you dead in your tracks, and if you did manage to
> navigate the convoluted and lying assed process fruitfully the local
> braindead citizenry would hound you mercilessly with every manner of
> contempt and deterrence.
> Society is hostile.

I suppose increasing regulations can be proportional to increasing
population densities.

> Seems to me that the thing I would concentrate on are what the costs of
> moving a shipping container are and places where such a thing can exist
> permanently.

If you treat a shipping container as a material, rather than a container
as such, perhaps you can creatively sneak it into the design and under
the radar? Anyway, my design might provide some inspiration. None of the
ones I've seen so far do too much in this regard and most still look
like shipping containers. My design, which hasn't really changed in the
past 4 years, works with the container, rather than against it.

Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 6, 2007, 10:31 pm
Don wrote:
> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>> Aesthete wrote:
>>> I presume that several active members here are building designers-
>>> registered architects or not. Don't get me wrong- I don't want to
>>> make a pres out of u and me.
>>>
>>> What kind of building design projects have people been working on
>>> recently?
>> Shipping-container retirement home.
>
> Still?
> Man, thats the worlds longest project! LOL

What's the rush? :)
Fortunately, I still have some time to go before retiring anyway. :)
Still, though, there seems to be far too many people rushing, rushing to
show everyone how busy they are and how fabulous being busy is or
something.
Didn't the best architectural projects of history take forever?
Seems the faster somethings are built, the often they're crap, and/or
that they'll be demolished.

What's "human time"? And are some aspects of the world out of its scale?

Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 7, 2007, 2:46 pm
Don wrote:
> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>> Don wrote:
>>> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>>>> Aesthete wrote:
>>>>> I presume that several active members here are building designers-
>>>>> registered architects or not. Don't get me wrong- I don't want to
>>>>> make a pres out of u and me.
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of building design projects have people been working on
>>>>> recently?
>>>> Shipping-container retirement home.
>>> Still?
>>> Man, thats the worlds longest project! LOL
>> What's the rush? :)
>> Fortunately, I still have some time to go before retiring anyway. :)
>> Still, though, there seems to be far too many people rushing, rushing to
>> show everyone how busy they are and how fabulous being busy is or
>> something.
>
> You're reading a little more into it than there is.
> I have 6 or more projects currently going on and maybe another 10 on the
> back burner, but I don't consider that as being *busy*.
> My time is my own.
>
> What I consider *busy* is if I have 24 hours of work due in 8 hours.
> Thats what I call assholes and elbows. heh
>
>> Didn't the best architectural projects of history take forever?
>
> In the past 20 years or so?
> No.
> Everything works on a schedule lately.
>
>> Seems the faster somethings are built, the often they're crap, and/or that
>> they'll be demolished.
>
> Some truth in that, but it doesn't negate the truth.
> When a client sets a timeline its best to try to meet it.
>
>> What's "human time"? And are some aspects of the world out of its scale?
>
> As if.......
>
> There are 3 types of people.
> 1) Those that let stuff happen.
> 2) Those that make stuff happen.
> 3) Those that say, 'What happened?'.

Hey, make stuff happen if you want. Step on others on the way. Move and
shake. Pollute the environment. Fly to Mars. Kill wildlife. Be a Movie
Star. Neglect your family and friends. Conquer new civilizations... Some
of us who are approaching things a little differently will might make
sure their progeny get a clear picture of you and avoid worshipping your
ass when they rewrite history. ;)

Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 7, 2007, 8:02 pm
Don wrote:
> "Seņor Popcorn-Coconut"> wrote
>> Hey, make stuff happen if you want. Step on others on the way. Move and
>> shake. Pollute the environment. Fly to Mars. Kill wildlife. Be a Movie
>> Star. Neglect your family and friends. Conquer new civilizations... Some
>> of us who are approaching things a little differently will might make sure
>> their progeny get a clear picture of you and avoid worshipping your ass
>> when they rewrite history. ;)
>
> Why so negative?

Am I? Regardless, is it not possible to make stuff happen and NOT step
on others? I mean, can not one move and shake without polluting?

Of course not. For things to happen, you HAVE to step on others and
pollute. What's so negative about that?

> Is it not possible to make stuff happen and NOT step on others?
> Can not one move and shake without polluting?

> Probably the worst thing I have ever done against business success was to
> neglect my family.
> It never happened, and thus my business is not world famous, nor am I in the
> glossy rags.

Nor a Chernobyl nuclear reactor survivor.

Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Building projects February 28, 2007, 9:43 am
Any special techniques in taking pictures on projects? February 17, 2008, 12:56 pm
The Australians are unable to manage construction projects properly. February 27, 2007, 8:52 pm
Current architectural styles? June 21, 2007, 6:26 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap