Home Page link

Folk songs of the far right wing

Home| Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 2 of 3       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Folk songs of the far right wing RicodJour 07-02-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by RicodJour on July 2, 2007, 4:11 pm
>
> >> > I wonder how the far right has influenced the GSA and their new
> >> > nomination of Thomas Gordon Smith as Associate Director (or some such)
> >> > for architecture.
>
> >> He's their man. You think it's just a coincidence?
>
> > Believe me, I get your drift. But if he was really their man, it
> > seems like the gov't could have pushed him beyond the unexpected
> > associate position. I think they want a traditionalist on board
> > without pissing off too many modernists, who generally run the
> > architectural show these days.
>
> I guess I should have used a winky-smiley....

I'm sorry, Michael, but as moderator I must remind you that I've
revoked your emoticon privileges. People are still upset at that
obscene Farsi emoticon stunt you pulled back in April. Six months
with good behavior and you'll be able to ;) again.

R


Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=F1or_Popcorn on July 2, 2007, 4:15 pm
RicodJour wrote:
>>>>> I wonder how the far right has influenced the GSA and their new
>>>>> nomination of Thomas Gordon Smith as Associate Director (or some such)
>>>>> for architecture.
>>>> He's their man. You think it's just a coincidence?
>>> Believe me, I get your drift. But if he was really their man, it
>>> seems like the gov't could have pushed him beyond the unexpected
>>> associate position. I think they want a traditionalist on board
>>> without pissing off too many modernists, who generally run the
>>> architectural show these days.
>> I guess I should have used a winky-smiley....
>
> I'm sorry, Michael, but as moderator I must remind you that I've
> revoked your emoticon privileges. People are still upset at that
> obscene Farsi emoticon stunt you pulled back in April. Six months
> with good behavior and you'll be able to ;) again.

Man that's harsh.

Posted by RicodJour on July 2, 2007, 4:25 pm
> RicodJour wrote:
>
> >> I guess I should have used a winky-smiley....
>
> > I'm sorry, Michael, but as moderator I must remind you that I've
> > revoked your emoticon privileges. People are still upset at that
> > obscene Farsi emoticon stunt you pulled back in April. Six months
> > with good behavior and you'll be able to ;) again.
>
> Man that's harsh.

Harsh?! He single-handedly had the internet emoticon industry's
collective backs against the wall. For a while there it seemed we'd
never :) again. It was a close call, but luckily cooler heads
prevailed.

R


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on July 2, 2007, 4:48 pm

>>
>> >> > I wonder how the far right has influenced the GSA and their new
>> >> > nomination of Thomas Gordon Smith as Associate Director (or some
>> >> > such)
>> >> > for architecture.
>>
>> >> He's their man. You think it's just a coincidence?
>>
>> > Believe me, I get your drift. But if he was really their man, it
>> > seems like the gov't could have pushed him beyond the unexpected
>> > associate position. I think they want a traditionalist on board
>> > without pissing off too many modernists, who generally run the
>> > architectural show these days.
>>
>> I guess I should have used a winky-smiley....
>
> I'm sorry, Michael, but as moderator I must remind you that I've
> revoked your emoticon privileges. People are still upset at that
> obscene Farsi emoticon stunt you pulled back in April. Six months
> with good behavior and you'll be able to ;) again.

I offended someone with my Fartsy?



Posted by RicodJour on July 2, 2007, 4:56 pm
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> > I wonder how the far right has influenced the GSA and their new
> >> >> > nomination of Thomas Gordon Smith as Associate Director (or some
> >> >> > such)
> >> >> > for architecture.
>
> >> >> He's their man. You think it's just a coincidence?
>
> >> > Believe me, I get your drift. But if he was really their man, it
> >> > seems like the gov't could have pushed him beyond the unexpected
> >> > associate position. I think they want a traditionalist on board
> >> > without pissing off too many modernists, who generally run the
> >> > architectural show these days.
>
> >> I guess I should have used a winky-smiley....
>
> > I'm sorry, Michael, but as moderator I must remind you that I've
> > revoked your emoticon privileges. People are still upset at that
> > obscene Farsi emoticon stunt you pulled back in April. Six months
> > with good behavior and you'll be able to ;) again.
>
> I offended someone with my Fartsy?

Tush-ay, Michael!

R


Page 2 of 3       < 1 2 3 > last >>

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap