Home Page link

How to go about getting a plan drawn

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
How to go about getting a plan drawn DIYer 03-27-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Jude Alexander on March 28, 2008, 5:40 pm

>
>>
>>>
>>>> Its not an easy fix, and I'm not gonna blow my brain thinking about all
>>>> the
>>>> details.
>>>> Get Simpson *ST6224* straps and tapcon them to the outside of the top
>>>> course
>>>> of block at each stud, then nail the strap to each stud.
>>>> Use (4) 3/16" x 1-1/2" tapcons, and (8) 16d's for each strap.
>>>> **ST6224 may not be long enough to do what you need. Get ahold of
>>>> Simpsons
>>>> catalog and find the length you need.
>>>> BTW: You'll not get much assistance at the big boxes and their supply
>>>> of
>>>> straps is pathetic, play on doing some legwork.
>>>
>>> Problem is it is easy to get the specs from Simpson for any of their
>>> products but I need to show the the ST6224 exceeds the mysterious
>>> specs of the 1/2" anchor bolts. Maybe if I had some reference that
>>> showed what the specs of 1/2" anchor bolt are.
>>>
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I don't think thats true.
>>> Its irrelevent what the specs are on the anchor bolts, because thats
>>> just *one* way to meet the code.
>>> What you have to do is find out what the code requires, then find the
>>> method to meet it.
>>> Yes, anchor bolts will do it, but so will other things.
>>> The uplifts and etc. are listed in the Simpson catalog.
>>> Hopefully you're not within a few hundred feet of a large body of water,
>>> cause if you are the rules are all different.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Curious, how are you gonna *lift* the entire house to do this chore?
>>>
>>> Triple 2x12s with two-layers of 4-ply 1/2" plywood in between as a
>>> beam under the joists.
>>> Lifted by three 20 ton jacks and 6x6 posts all resting on a 2x10 lying
>>> on the concrete basement floor to help distribute the weight.
>>>
>>> I only plan on doing about 12' at a time. Then dealing with the
>>> cracked drywall later.
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> OK, now I get it, the sill plate is UNDER the joists.
>>
>> I asked the OP why he needed to change his sill plates. He never
>> answered. If the reason still exists for the damaged sill plates, perhaps
>> he should consider a solution prior to replacing them??? :)
>
> The way I'm envisioning it the sill plate (2x8?) is sitting on the
> concrete block stemwall and then the joists are sitting on the sill plate.
> What happened, if thats the case, is that there was not proper drainage
> and the sill plates rotted.
> So yes, figuring out why they rotted would go a long way in preventing
> this from happening again.

That was my thought exactly. Just replacing them isn't going to solve the
original problem. :)



Posted by Jude Alexander on March 27, 2008, 4:53 pm
Why does your sill plate need replacing?



Posted by Pat on March 27, 2008, 5:39 pm
DIYer wrote:
> I need to replace the sill plate in my house so I figure out how I am
> going to lift/support everything while I remove & replace. Then like
> a good law-abiding citizen I call the building inspector and ask
> about
> the paperwork requirements. He asks me about the job I intend to do
> and I explain it and he tells me I need 2 copies of the plan, a
> completed permit application and also mentions anchor bolts are
> required. I explain that as far as I can tell there are no existing
> bolts on the damaged sill plate. No matter, a repair to a structure
> requires it is brought up to code.
>
> I do some googling, talk to the guys at 84 Lumber, and submit my
> paperwork planning to use Simpson UFPs in place of the anchor bolts.
> http://www.strongtie.com/products/connectors/UFP.asp
> A few days later I get a call that my application is rejected because
> the Simpson UFP is only rated for installation in a concrete
> foundation not in concrete block even if the top course is grout-
> filled (which is what I have). I tell the inspector that the joists
> are only 2x8s so by the time I get right-angle drill in there I'll
> have no room for a drill bit. He says all I can tell you is the code
> requires '7" imbedment of 1/2" bolts within 12" of the end of a board
> and spaced no more than every 6 feet'.
>
>
> I ask him what have other people used in the past and he tells me he
> is not allowed to recommend products and I should call around to
> different manufacturers. Fair enough, I call Simpson, KC Metal
> Products, USP Connectors and Red Head; none of them could reccomend a
> product to me other than 1/2 bolts that can be screwed in to the
> depth
> required. Does me no good I can't drill a hole that deep and even if
> I could I couldn't get the bolt in.
> ~7 1/2"vertical clearance - 1 1/2" for the sill means the most I
> could
> go is 6" deep.
>
>
> I call the DCA in NJ (dept. in charge of code compliance) and talk to
> the head engineer. He starts telling me about the 7" imbedment of
> 1/2' bolts etc. I ask him for some guidance and he tells me it is
> incumbent on me to submit a plan that meets or exceeds the anchor
> bolt
> specs. Of course my question is "What are the specs for the anchor
> bolts"? He starts again with the 7" imbedment, I interupt and ask
> him
> what the pullout rating and the shear strength of those 7" bolts is.
> He tells me he doesn't have that information. WTF! How am I
> supposed to find a product that meets or exceeds the specs when he
> can't tell me the specs?
>
>
> NJ didn't write their building code, they just adopted the ICC and
> made a few modifications so I call the ICC. I get the same speech
> about the code
> requires 7" bolts... Again, he can't give the specs for anchor bolts
> just that they need to be 1/2" bolts imbedded 7".
>
>
> I can't be the only idiot that has had termite damage to a house with
> 2x8
> floor joists but I may be the only idiot that tried to get a permit
> to
> fix the damage.
>
> How would I go about finding an architect or engineer to certify that
> a technique or product is equivelant to 7" imbedded 1/2" bolts?
>
> Is this the kind of things architects or engineers are inclined to do?
>
> Is it standard practice for a building inspector to accept anything
> from an architect or is there a formal review process?
>
> Obivously I've had no experience with architects or engineers so I
> don't know where to begin.

Maybe I'm being stupid here, but you're trying to meet the code more
than any care about safety, structural integrity, or the real world.

You have block walls and need to put bolts into them for the sill plate.

You can't drill in from the top.

Without spending time thinking this out, why can't you just take a
hammer and break a block out. Take a new block and fill the cavity with
cement and a treaded tube. Then put the new block in to place and
mortar it into place? I'll know why it's not good but I'll let someone
else figure out why it isn't legal; since you're looking for legal, not
necessarily good.

Barring that, why not just chisel out a 1" hole, cut off a bolt, expoy
it into place the put on the sill plate before you get caught. It'll
look right and no one will know the difference unless there's a tornado.

Posted by DIYer on March 27, 2008, 6:45 pm
>
> Barring that, why not just chisel out a 1" hole, cut off a bolt, expoy
> it into place the put on the sill plate before you get caught. =A0It'll
> look right and no one will know the difference unless there's a tornado.

I started out wanting to do it right but I may end up doing just what
you suggest.

Posted by EDS on March 28, 2008, 7:17 pm



>
> Barring that, why not just chisel out a 1" hole, cut off a bolt, expoy
> it into place the put on the sill plate before you get caught. It'll
> look right and no one will know the difference unless there's a tornado.

I started out wanting to do it right but I may end up doing just what
you suggest.

I assume the original bolts remain. I did a remodeling a year ago that we
had to replace the termite eaten sills and central beam in a 30 year old
house. This solution was accepted by the inspector. We removed the lowest
shingle course and installed new termite flashing from each side, lapping
over a inch past the concrete wall prior to installing the sills.Termites
will not eat LVL (as far as I know) beams, so we took LVL beams laid flat,
slotted to accept the anchor bolts, and slid the sill pieces into place from
the basement, then cranked down on the nuts and lowered the joists. Used
Simpson ties from new sills to every joist, many of which we had to sister.
The central beam was also replaced with a new LVL beam. There were NO cracks
in the GWB when completed (not that it made a difference as we were gutting
quite a bit. The bolts are for uplift, so tying the joists to the secured
sill accomplishes that.
EDS



Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2
Similar ThreadsPosted
House Plan Ideas August 15, 2007, 3:21 pm
Help! I lost a free "green" house plan November 16, 2007, 12:10 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap