|
Posted by Edgar on August 29, 2007, 5:34 pm
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Are commercial bathroom stalls too narrow?
>>>>> The few times I've been in stalls, because the urinals were occupied,
>>>>> they seem to be getting narrower all the time.
>>>>> Plus, with the giant TP holder on the side its rather difficult to
>>>>> even get to the throne let alone sit down and utilize it.
>>>>> What about persons that have, through anatomical necessity, a wide
>>>>> stance, are they to suffer or at the very least endure the confins as
>>>>> they are?
>>>>> Not to mention the legal ramifications thereof.
>>>>> I suggest all stalls from this point forth shall have a more
>>>>> accomodating space in reference to the *widening* of the populace.
>>>>> Fat asses too have the *right* to expel their bowels in comfort
>>>>> without the embarrassing accusations that might be brought forth
>>>>> resulting from the current narrow stall dimensional standards.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2wszr3
>>>>
>>>> What is it with all the "straight" married men having sex in men's
>>>> bathrooms???
>>>
>>> Ya know, back when jethro klintin was waggin his prod all over the place
>>> the reps had a siamese kow.
>>> Now, when they are in power, they are waggin their pickles at everything
>>> that walks by.
>>> (and the dems ain't sayin shit)
>>
>> I've always heard that quite a few reps have skeletons in their closets
>> also. In such a case as this "closet" takes on a whole other meaning.
>>>
>>> Somebody ought to make a new TV police drama called 'CSI Minneapolis -
>>> Cruise Scene Investigator. There are 8 million stories in the Naked
>>> Bathroom'.
>>
>> Geez, remember when the guy who owns Hustler Mag. offered a lot of $ if
>> they could provide proof of any big politician doing "funny business?"
>
> Yep, during the Arkansas Long March, Larry Flint.
> Been saying it for years, both sides of the aisle are corrupt, but that
> doesn't stop the gomer pyles of the world from lining up at the polls to
> choose the lesser of 2 evils, whatever the hell thats supposed to mean.
> Would you rather shoot yourself in the head with a 357 or a 38? ....only
> in voter La La land.....
>
>
You went hiking and a boulder landed on your arm in the middle of nowhere,
with nobody around and no cell phone or anything. The boulder is much to
big to move, and there is nothing around to be used as leverage. On your
person you have only a Swiss army knife as the backpack landed about 10 feet
away from you and you can't reach it. Do you:
a) starve to death
or
b) cut your arm off with the Swiss army knife and live to tell the tale as a
legless wonder?
I guess the only thing left to say is, either way your fucked, because
drafting is hard with one arm LOL.
--
Edgar
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap