If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Warm Worm on March 5, 2008, 5:19 pm
RicodJour wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> You may want to vacate the little rent free space Don inhabits in your head.
>
> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two stubborn
> people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment so they can
> 'win'.
>
> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents...
I've got another one; email each other. Take it outside.
Failing that (rolls eyes), how about one standard for Don, and another
for everyone else? ;D
|
|
Posted by ++ on March 5, 2008, 5:50 pm
Warm Worm wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> RicodJour wrote:
>>> You may want to vacate the little rent free space Don inhabits in
>>> your head.
>> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two stubborn
>> people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment so they can
>> 'win'.
>> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
>> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents...
> I've got another one; email each other. Take it outside.
> Failing that (rolls eyes), how about one standard for Don, and another
> for everyone else? ;D
How about, if it's offensive, killfile it? Not seeing it at all, except
when someone replies to it, whatever "it" is, means never having to
accidentally respond to it
|
|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on March 5, 2008, 6:18 pm
++ wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Warm Worm wrote:
>> RicodJour wrote:
>>>> You may want to vacate the little rent free space Don inhabits in
>>>> your head.
>>> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two
>>> stubborn people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment
>>> so they can 'win'.
>>> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
>>> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents...
>> I've got another one; email each other. Take it outside.
>> Failing that (rolls eyes), how about one standard for Don, and
>> another for everyone else? ;D
> How about, if it's offensive, killfile it? Not seeing it at all,
> except when someone replies to it, whatever "it" is, means never
> having to accidentally respond to it
You killfile identities, not messages. Don Linsenbach has flamed one too
many.
|
|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on March 5, 2008, 6:05 pm
Warm Worm wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> RicodJour wrote:
>>> You may want to vacate the little rent free space Don inhabits in
>>> your head.
>> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two stubborn
>> people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment so they can
>> 'win'.
>> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
>> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents...
> I've got another one; email each other. Take it outside.
> Failing that (rolls eyes), how about one standard for Don, and another
> for everyone else? ;D
You mean the status quo?
|
|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on March 5, 2008, 6:03 pm
RicodJour wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> You may want to vacate the little rent free space Don inhabits in
>> your head.
> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two stubborn
> people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment so they can
> 'win'.
> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents if they're
> still alive, and the person that doesn't hear, "Yeah, he's an asshole,
> but you're acting like an asshole, too. You're never going to win, so
> just ignore him." wins!*
Who is innocent here, and what aren't they enjoying? There is still all the
wonderful content provided by the Redneck Broadcasting System. You've
watched Don Linsenbach insult and chase numerous gentler people from the
group, under his current identity. If you've been enjoying this
cyber-bloodsport, I'm sure the vanquished would hardly call that innocent.
You haven't answered my other questions about shaking and making up with Don
Linsenbach yet, Rico. Remember them? I've asked them several times now, so
I'm left to wonder why you won't answer. They are:
Have you ever asked anyone to shake hands and make up with Don Linsenbach
before?
If so, how did that turn out?
I have stated generous terms:
No offensive behavior towards others from Don Linsenbach, and
no OT political/philosophical blogging by Don Linsenbach on the group
and I'll stand down, and treat him civilly.
Would this spoil your 'innocent' fun?
|
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Attitude + Drugs = Insane Architecture | March 5, 2008, 1:48 pm |
| Hawaiian Modern: The Architecture of Vladimir Ossipoff at Yale Art and Architecture Gallery (Art Daily) | September 15, 2008, 1:09 pm |
| alt. architecture FAQ | February 5, 2007, 4:04 pm |
| Re: alt.architecture | March 2, 2007, 12:40 pm |
| Architecture? | July 2, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| Architecture | July 20, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| About the architecture | April 27, 2006, 4:47 am |
| what does this have to do with architecture ? | June 12, 2005, 9:45 am |
| Architecture Forum | February 9, 2007, 8:01 pm |
| Looking for archimedes architecture | May 25, 2007, 6:09 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>
> Succinctly put. The thing I find most troubling is that two stubborn
> people are willing to fuck up innocent peoples' enjoyment so they can
> 'win'.
>
> Here's the deal for Michael and Don - show any one of these stupid
> threads you're both propagating to your kids, or parents...