|
Posted by Kris Krieger on January 29, 2008, 1:36 pm
> Don wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Cheap and without any sophistication." Not my niche, and probably
>>>> not worth the time spent on a good proposal. The crap out there is
>>>> truly astonishing.
>>> Well the designs may be "Cheap without any sophistication", but
>>> that, coupled with a working spouse has kept Don above water for
>>> quite a while, so who are we to judge.
>>> Besides he already told one client "were to stick it".
>>
>> There's a saying that goes something like, "There's only 1 dwg file
>> and everyone has been editing it ever since."
>> Houses have walls, floors, ceilings, and roofs, the rest is just
>> personal preferences.
>> The house I did for the lady in Birmingham, a strictly web client I
>> never met in person, sent me 3 different stockplans as a guide but by
>> the time it was done it didn't even remotely resemble any of them.
>> I'm ignorant of the contruction costs in Birmingham but in SW FL that
>> house would cost on the order of $700k+ and I don't consider that
>> cheap. Another webclient, in Sacremento, sent me 6 stockplans and
>> that house will be 4000 sf with a semi detached mothers house and a
>> semi detached 4 car garage, again, I'm estimating in the $700k range
>> in FL dollars. The trend seems to be that people that seek me out on
>> the web aren't cheap.
>
> I wonder if there's software out there that could input all the
> preferred stock floor-plans received from the client and automatically
> generate them into a completely new one that, like an offspring, would
> be a completely new plan, yet bear a lineage and resemblance to its
> parents.
>
> With parametric modeling or some-such, it's probably on its way.
>
THat sounds like a complete nightmare...
|