|
Posted by Warm Worm on November 16, 2007, 2:09 pm
Don wrote:
>> Don wrote:
>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And what about her children? Have they been put in that situation
>>>>>>>> because of THEIR choices?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other people's children are none of your business.
>>>>
>>>> "...Many states have broad statutes requiring 'any person' to report.
>>>>
>>>> * Extent of the knowledge triggering the duty to report varies. Some
>>>> statutes call for reporting upon a mere 'reasonable cause to believe'
>>>> or a 'reasonable suspicion.' Other statutes require the reporter to
>>>> 'know or suspect,' which is a higher degree of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> * Failure to report suspected child abuse can result in criminal
>>>> liability, although the liability is typically a misdemeanor punishable
>>>> by a fine.
>>>>
>>>> * Failure to report can result in civil liability..."
>>>>
>>>> Rest of article:
>>>> -- http://www.smith-lawfirm.com/mandatory_reporting.htm
>>>>
>>>>>> They are unless I live in a fortress and never leave it.
>>>>> You're wrong, and you know it.
>>>> I think you're "projecting".
>>>>
>>>>> Do you read supermarket tabloids too?
>>>>> Are there limits to your noseyness?
>>>> "According to a recent UNICEF report on child well-being[3] the United
>>>> States... ranked lowest among rich nations with respect to the well
>>>> being of their children."
>>>> -- Wikipedia.org
>>> We're not speaking the same language.
>>> You're quoting Seinfeld episodes.....
>> I hardly watch tv, and I speak and write English. How about you? (Not that
>> it's any of my business, mind you.)
>>
>> Why even bother being on here and chatting with 'people'-- a community so
>> to speak-- and blasting the US government (notice I didn't write 'your'
>> government) and practically "everything else under the sun" if you're into
>> minding your own business?
>
> Like I said, we're not speaking the same language.
Perhaps your apparent attitudes and values you've expressed over the
years-- unstandardized education, child "neglect", uncontrolled private
weaponry, land-ownership and markets-- speaks closer to the dialect than
you realize of a government you apparently love to hate.
> You seem to be having great difficulty understanding the words *minding ones
> own business* and coming all apart at the seams rasslin' with it.
> Thats your problem, not mine, and its yours to work through.
If you want to be flippant, disingenuous or cryptic, that's your
prerogative, and, again, seems along the lines of some of the values or
modus operandi of your very own pet-peeve of a government.
Dictatorships and the like come and go, but their core values, attitudes
and styles remain.
|