Home Page link

Re: The value of shopping local

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 1 of 6       1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: The value of shopping local Amy Blankenship 11-11-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Amy Blankenship on November 11, 2007, 12:47 am

>
>>
>>> "Amy Blankenship"> wrote
>>>> But what if there _were_ no public education?
>>>
>>> The world, and the US in particular, would be a much better place.
>>>
>>>> Then only the people whose _parents_ had means will ever amount to
>>>> anything.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no corrolation at all between a public school so-called
>>> education and people *amounting* to anything.
>>> More people suffer because the public schools exist and unless you live
>>> in a cave in idaho you're very much aware of the failings of the schools
>>> and the spiraling costs.
>>> So why are you defending such a dismal failure?
>>
>> Have you looked at what countries that don't have publicly funded
>> educational systems are like?
>
> You're an expert at ignoring the obvious and unanswering questions....
> If you're such a fan of other countries why don't you live in one of them?
> ....perhaps the reality is too much to bear.

I wouldn't live in a country without a publicly funded educational system.
That was the point. However, I do feel sorry for you that you can't look to
other places for ideas.



Posted by Warm Worm on November 11, 2007, 4:25 pm
Don wrote:
>>>>> "Amy Blankenship"> wrote
>>>>>> But what if there _were_ no public education?
>>>>> The world, and the US in particular, would be a much better place.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then only the people whose _parents_ had means will ever amount to
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no corrolation at all between a public school so-called
>>>>> education and people *amounting* to anything.
>>>>> More people suffer because the public schools exist and unless you live
>>>>> in a cave in idaho you're very much aware of the failings of the
>>>>> schools and the spiraling costs.
>>>>> So why are you defending such a dismal failure?
>>>> Have you looked at what countries that don't have publicly funded
>>>> educational systems are like?
>>> You're an expert at ignoring the obvious and unanswering questions....
>>> If you're such a fan of other countries why don't you live in one of
>>> them?
>>> ....perhaps the reality is too much to bear.
>> I wouldn't live in a country without a publicly funded educational system.
>> That was the point. However, I do feel sorry for you that you can't look
>> to other places for ideas.
>
> In fact Amy, I have looked to other places, and have assisted thousands of
> other people in this regard as well, so don't waste your time feeling sorry
> for me.
> The thing is, I don't look at the public schools and throw my hands up in
> the air.
> I have found a very successful solution for parents that are REALLY
> concerned about educating their kids, not just talking about it.
>
> Now, what have YOU done about the issue of poor education for kids?
>

Well, last night, I attended a kind of dinner-seminar-discussion with
Matt Hern... Does that count? ;)

"...Other critical pedagogues more famous for their anti-schooling,
unschooling, or deschooling perspectives include Ivan Illich, John Holt,
Ira Shor, John Taylor Gatto, and Matt Hern..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_pedagogy

...And:

http://www.democracynature.org/dn/vol6/hern_chaulk_internet.htm

(Unsure each article is related to the same person, but they probably are)

At the end of it, some of us split into groups and I mentioned in
passing, my 'Inversity' idea to one group, and where they might be able
to find a little about it-- namely at alt.architecture, of all places. :D

...I think it should be mandatory that the government pay each family
with a child or more, enough money to buy a sailboat and sail around the
world for a full year. ;)

(Although I'm still half-serious:
http://www.bluewateradventures.ca/Special/school.htm
There are doubtless countless other similar programmes out there.)

It is my contention that students need to be brought out into _the
open_, from beyond the four walls of academia and into the real world of
air, land and sea... and yes, maybe also markets and governments, etc..

Field-trips to museums are not the real world.
A museum is yet another depository or institution.

Posted by Kris Krieger on November 17, 2007, 7:51 pm

[ ... ]
>
> ...I think it should be mandatory that the government pay each family
> with a child or more, enough money to buy a sailboat and sail around
> the world for a full year. ;)
>
> (Although I'm still half-serious:
> http://www.bluewateradventures.ca/Special/school.htm
> There are doubtless countless other similar programmes out there.)
>
> It is my contention that students need to be brought out into _the
> open_, from beyond the four walls of academia and into the real world
> of air, land and sea... and yes, maybe also markets and governments,
> etc..
>
> Field-trips to museums are not the real world.
> A museum is yet another depository or institution.
>

I actualy think that is not such a bad idea. Sometimes I think I owuld
love to teach (I'm sure none of you has ever suspected that I have a bit of
apedantic nature <LOL!!>), but the whole "classroom" thing puts me off,
because what I would like to pass on is my love of, and excitement about,
the natural world, and how Science helps us uncover and understand it. The
problem is that this is extremely difficult, excpet for very talented
"natural-born" teachers, to communicate withing th econfines of a concrete
room.

The other problem is the strictures - I have a friend who is a teacher, and
it seems that the *vast* majority of time is wasted upon adhering to this
or that bureaucrat's pet dumbass "theory of education", and on teaching the
kids to memorize the andwers of the dumbass "no child left behind" (talk
about lack of truth in advertising...) Federal money acquisition forms.

IMO, Nature is the best classroom, because it is constantly stimulating,
and is the wellspring of a child's curiosity - which, in turn, is the
cornerstone of a continuing desire to learn.

Hence, I do not teach, and have never sought to little piece of paper taht
grants me permission to do so.


Posted by Warm Worm on November 18, 2007, 2:58 pm
Kris Krieger wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>> ...I think it should be mandatory that the government pay each family
>> with a child or more, enough money to buy a sailboat and sail around
>> the world for a full year. ;)
>>
>> (Although I'm still half-serious:
>> http://www.bluewateradventures.ca/Special/school.htm
>> There are doubtless countless other similar programmes out there.)
>>
>> It is my contention that students need to be brought out into _the
>> open_, from beyond the four walls of academia and into the real world
>> of air, land and sea... and yes, maybe also markets and governments,
>> etc..
>>
>> Field-trips to museums are not the real world.
>> A museum is yet another depository or institution.
>>
>
> I actualy think that is not such a bad idea. Sometimes I think I owuld
> love to teach (I'm sure none of you has ever suspected that I have a bit of
> apedantic nature <LOL!!>), but the whole "classroom" thing puts me off,
> because what I would like to pass on is my love of, and excitement about,
> the natural world, and how Science helps us uncover and understand it. The
> problem is that this is extremely difficult, excpet for very talented
> "natural-born" teachers, to communicate withing th econfines of a concrete
> room.
>
> The other problem is the strictures - I have a friend who is a teacher, and
> it seems that the *vast* majority of time is wasted upon adhering to this
> or that bureaucrat's pet dumbass "theory of education", and on teaching the
> kids to memorize the andwers of the dumbass "no child left behind" (talk
> about lack of truth in advertising...) Federal money acquisition forms.
>
> IMO, Nature is the best classroom, because it is constantly stimulating,
> and is the wellspring of a child's curiosity - which, in turn, is the
> cornerstone of a continuing desire to learn.

(Qualification: what follows is a hypothesis)

Agreed, but also including government, industry and markets and so
forth-- whatever's part of the world and beyond.

'Open-Door Education'.

Education turned inside-out:

*_INVERSITY_*

If students are brought _way_ more beyond the classroom (and/or
reinventing what a "classroom" and "school" are and can be), then those
areas that they visit, study-- and, yes, even apprentice, co-op and work
in, etc., will also learn and teach-- and have more to answer for.
There will be more transparency by necessity.

Currently, students seem hardly allowed to go anywhere. That's not
community or how close-knit, successful tribes worked, or anything else.
It's built-in ignorance, failures and disasters waiting-to-happen.
More eyes see more, even if they're still learning-- or maybe especially so.

If, as I've read this week here, education is supposed to prepare one
for the real world, then I think we're going about it the wrong way.

I propose that the very act of seeding students throughout (which is
where they should rightfully be) could change our systems/world for the
better-- government, industry, markets, education-- everything.

> Hence, I do not teach, and have never sought to little piece of paper taht
> grants me permission to do so.

I'd be surprised if you needed a paper to teach in many contexts.
It might be just a question of getting it going, a la grass-roots.

For example, rather that just setting up a garage only for himself, Don
could easily create a "one-room schoolhouse" for drafting and building.

Posted by Warm Worm on November 19, 2007, 9:24 pm
Don wrote:
>> Kris Krieger wrote:
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>> ...I think it should be mandatory that the government pay each family
>>>> with a child or more, enough money to buy a sailboat and sail around
>>>> the world for a full year. ;)
>>>>
>>>> (Although I'm still half-serious:
>>>> http://www.bluewateradventures.ca/Special/school.htm
>>>> There are doubtless countless other similar programmes out there.)
>>>>
>>>> It is my contention that students need to be brought out into _the
>>>> open_, from beyond the four walls of academia and into the real world
>>>> of air, land and sea... and yes, maybe also markets and governments,
>>>> etc..
>>>> Field-trips to museums are not the real world.
>>>> A museum is yet another depository or institution.
>>>>
>>> I actualy think that is not such a bad idea. Sometimes I think I owuld
>>> love to teach (I'm sure none of you has ever suspected that I have a bit
>>> of apedantic nature <LOL!!>), but the whole "classroom" thing puts me
>>> off, because what I would like to pass on is my love of, and excitement
>>> about, the natural world, and how Science helps us uncover and understand
>>> it. The problem is that this is extremely difficult, excpet for very
>>> talented "natural-born" teachers, to communicate withing th econfines of
>>> a concrete room.
>>>
>>> The other problem is the strictures - I have a friend who is a teacher,
>>> and it seems that the *vast* majority of time is wasted upon adhering to
>>> this or that bureaucrat's pet dumbass "theory of education", and on
>>> teaching the kids to memorize the andwers of the dumbass "no child left
>>> behind" (talk about lack of truth in advertising...) Federal money
>>> acquisition forms.
>>>
>>> IMO, Nature is the best classroom, because it is constantly stimulating,
>>> and is the wellspring of a child's curiosity - which, in turn, is the
>>> cornerstone of a continuing desire to learn.
>> (Qualification: what follows is a hypothesis)
>>
>> Agreed, but also including government, industry and markets and so forth--
>> whatever's part of the world and beyond.
>>
>> 'Open-Door Education'.
>>
>> Education turned inside-out:
>>
>> *_INVERSITY_*
>>
>> If students are brought _way_ more beyond the classroom (and/or
>> reinventing what a "classroom" and "school" are and can be), then those
>> areas that they visit, study-- and, yes, even apprentice, co-op and work
>> in, etc., will also learn and teach-- and have more to answer for.
>> There will be more transparency by necessity.
>>
>> Currently, students seem hardly allowed to go anywhere. That's not
>> community or how close-knit, successful tribes worked, or anything else.
>> It's built-in ignorance, failures and disasters waiting-to-happen.
>> More eyes see more, even if they're still learning-- or maybe especially
>> so.
>>
>> If, as I've read this week here, education is supposed to prepare one for
>> the real world, then I think we're going about it the wrong way.
>>
>> I propose that the very act of seeding students throughout (which is where
>> they should rightfully be) could change our systems/world for the better--
>> government, industry, markets, education-- everything.
>>
>>> Hence, I do not teach, and have never sought to little piece of paper
>>> taht grants me permission to do so.
>> I'd be surprised if you needed a paper to teach in many contexts.
>> It might be just a question of getting it going, a la grass-roots.
>>
>> For example, rather that just setting up a garage only for himself, Don
>> could easily create a "one-room schoolhouse" for drafting and building.
>
> There are sides to Don that no one knows.
> Many sides.

Fair enough, and of course... I've already suggested, perhaps outright,
that I value your "online forum" side(s).
The many things you know that I don't is in part what brings me here--
architecture, building, ACAD, framing with balloons...

(joking with the last bit ;)

I love reading what you guys have to say in that area, even if I don't
always completely understand it.
Hopefully, our public sides, though, or the main sides others see, are
fair to our sides unseen, that what-is and who-is behind the scenes is
not somehow undermined or devalued, if only through the eyes of others.

If you feel you're not being read properly or fairly, perhaps it might
be a good time to consider avoiding some topics that you think might put
you in the mire... Not that that's necessarily a big deal if you can
handle it, or that we'll all invariably end up there from time to time! :)

> For the past 3 weeks I have been constructing 30 LARGE birdhouses for the
> local middle school students.
> They are made from mostly scrap lumber from my various construction projects
> but I have also expended some coin for materials as well.
> Like I said, they are large, about 18" each way and the art class is going
> to hold a contest amongst the 8th graders to come up with the most creative
> way to decorate them and then they will be auctioned off with the proceeds
> going back into that classroom.
> Art, and crafts are real big issues around here and long money is expended
> to that end and these kids are going to make a killing on this thing.
> I was happy to help them out.
> No, none of the students came into my workshop, yet, but they are deriving
> benefit from it none the less.
> The birdhouses wouldn't fit in my truck all in one fell swoop, it took 3
> trips to get all of them to the school..
> I assembled them and sprayed all of them white to create a unified blank
> canvas, if you will.
> People are quick to believe that a 1/16" wide facet that is exposed in a
> public format comprises an entire picture and if they are so shallow to do
> so than so be it, but I have no time for such silliness.
> I spent almost 16 hours today *helping* out on a habitat for humanity
> project that I have been involved with since august and it seems my small
> inventory of tools and expertise is extreme to the locals that have never
> even seen a nail gun. Back when I reworked their disfuntional *architect*
> designed plan and came up with a more comprehensive and value engineered
> plan and a gateway to expedite the materials delivery process to act like a
> conveyor between the workers and the application.

Very cool and commendable, and glad you shared it-- it's inspirational.

> You see, an iceburg is 2/3 invisible........
> There's plenty of other tricks in my bag and most will never be
> known..........and thats the way I prefer it..........
> Onward.

Hypothetically, an iceberg, brimming with clear pristine fresh ice, can
float by an industrial town and get its above-surface portion coated
with a thin brownish-gray film of industrial pollutants. ;)

Page 1 of 6       1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: The value of shopping local November 11, 2007, 12:34 am
Re: The value of shopping local November 13, 2007, 6:50 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:30 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:36 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:43 pm
Right to have armaments was Re: The value of shopping local November 10, 2007, 7:32 pm
This is a local bar in a town of 300 May 23, 2007, 4:40 pm
How to find a local architect April 18, 2008, 1:15 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap