Home Page link

Re: The value of shopping local

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 2 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: The value of shopping local Amy Blankenship 11-11-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Kris Krieger on November 20, 2007, 6:04 pm

> Kris Krieger wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>> ...I think it should be mandatory that the government pay each
>>> family with a child or more, enough money to buy a sailboat and sail
>>> around the world for a full year. ;)
>>>
>>> (Although I'm still half-serious:
>>> http://www.bluewateradventures.ca/Special/school.htm
>>> There are doubtless countless other similar programmes out there.)
>>>
>>> It is my contention that students need to be brought out into _the
>>> open_, from beyond the four walls of academia and into the real
>>> world of air, land and sea... and yes, maybe also markets and
>>> governments, etc..
>>>
>>> Field-trips to museums are not the real world.
>>> A museum is yet another depository or institution.
>>>
>>
>> I actualy think that is not such a bad idea. Sometimes I think I
>> owuld love to teach (I'm sure none of you has ever suspected that I
>> have a bit of apedantic nature <LOL!!>), but the whole "classroom"
>> thing puts me off, because what I would like to pass on is my love
>> of, and excitement about, the natural world, and how Science helps us
>> uncover and understand it. The problem is that this is extremely
>> difficult, excpet for very talented "natural-born" teachers, to
>> communicate withing th econfines of a concrete room.
>>
>> The other problem is the strictures - I have a friend who is a
>> teacher, and it seems that the *vast* majority of time is wasted upon
>> adhering to this or that bureaucrat's pet dumbass "theory of
>> education", and on teaching the kids to memorize the andwers of the
>> dumbass "no child left behind" (talk about lack of truth in
>> advertising...) Federal money acquisition forms.
>>
>> IMO, Nature is the best classroom, because it is constantly
>> stimulating, and is the wellspring of a child's curiosity - which, in
>> turn, is the cornerstone of a continuing desire to learn.
>
> (Qualification: what follows is a hypothesis)
>
> Agreed, but also including government, industry and markets and so
> forth-- whatever's part of the world and beyond.
>
> 'Open-Door Education'.

I think of going outside, because that is the very first thing you can do
with children. Everything else comes later ;)


>
> Education turned inside-out:
>
> *_INVERSITY_*
>
> If students are brought _way_ more beyond the classroom (and/or
> reinventing what a "classroom" and "school" are and can be), then
> those areas that they visit, study-- and, yes, even apprentice, co-op
> and work in, etc., will also learn and teach-- and have more to answer
> for. There will be more transparency by necessity.

Anyplace can be a classroom. That's the point that IMO too many poeple
miss. THe best IMO is to go out, observe, collect data, and so on, and
then come back (to someplace) to discuss it, digest it.

I could never do math because it was never tied to anything - it was just
a matter of "shut up and learn it, and if you can't learn it, shut up
anyway". Once i got out of school, I did more math than I ever did in
school, because it bacemae a tool rather than just some abstract bit of
pedagoguery.


>
> Currently, students seem hardly allowed to go anywhere. That's not
> community or how close-knit, successful tribes worked, or anything
> else. It's built-in ignorance, failures and disasters
> waiting-to-happen. More eyes see more, even if they're still
> learning-- or maybe especially so.

True.

>
> If, as I've read this week here, education is supposed to prepare one
> for the real world, then I think we're going about it the wrong way.
>
> I propose that the very act of seeding students throughout (which is
> where they should rightfully be) could change our systems/world for
> the better-- government, industry, markets, education-- everything.
>
>> Hence, I do not teach, and have never sought to little piece of paper
>> taht grants me permission to do so.
>
> I'd be surprised if you needed a paper to teach in many contexts.
> It might be just a question of getting it going, a la grass-roots.
>
> For example, rather that just setting up a garage only for himself,
> Don could easily create a "one-room schoolhouse" for drafting and
> building.
>

Heh ;)


Posted by ++ on November 21, 2007, 12:44 pm


Kris Krieger wrote:

>I think of going outside, because that is the very first thing you can do
>with children. Everything else comes later ;)
>
>

I think you are absolutely correct. http://www.outdoorlab.org/Home2.asp
Curricula: http://www.outdoorlab.org/learning2.asp This is one
example. There are many others. And there are guides online for how to
design and plan your own . Here are a few links:
http://jeffcoweb.jeffco.k12.co.us/elem/windypeak/proginfo.html
http://www.clemson.edu/outdoorlab/ and
http://www.westminster.edu/common/coding/404.cfm show difference in
approaches.

>Anyplace can be a classroom. That's the point that IMO too many poeple
>miss. THe best IMO is to go out, observe, collect data, and so on, and
>then come back (to someplace) to discuss it, digest it.
>
>
I home schooled for many years so I'm with you on this one.

>I could never do math because it was never tied to anything - it was just
>a matter of "shut up and learn it, and if you can't learn it, shut up
>anyway".
>
Nothing like learning multiplication with half cartons of eggs and then
using those eggs to make omelettes, angel food cakes and etc. Can do
division with piles of nails...

> Once i got out of school, I did more math than I ever did in
>school, because it bacemae a tool rather than just some abstract bit of
>pedagoguery.
>
>
Carpentry projects are great for kids to learn a little solid geometry.

>
>
>
>>Currently, students seem hardly allowed to go anywhere. That's not
>>community or how close-knit, successful tribes worked, or anything
>>else. It's built-in ignorance, failures and disasters
>>waiting-to-happen. More eyes see more, even if they're still
>>learning-- or maybe especially so.
>>
>>
>
>True.
>
>
>
>>
>>I'd be surprised if you needed a paper to teach in many contexts.
>>It might be just a question of getting it going, a la grass-roots.
>>
>>For example, rather that just setting up a garage only for himself,
>>Don could easily create a "one-room schoolhouse" for drafting and
>>building.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Heh ;)
>
>
>
>


Posted by Kris Krieger on November 21, 2007, 6:08 pm

>
>
> Kris Krieger wrote:
>
>>I think of going outside, because that is the very first thing you can
>>do with children. Everything else comes later ;)
>>
>>
>
> I think you are absolutely correct.
> http://www.outdoorlab.org/Home2.asp Curricula:
> http://www.outdoorlab.org/learning2.asp This is one example. There
> are many others. And there are guides online for how to design and
> plan your own . Here are a few links:
> http://jeffcoweb.jeffco.k12.co.us/elem/windypeak/proginfo.html
> http://www.clemson.edu/outdoorlab/ and
> http://www.westminster.edu/common/coding/404.cfm show difference in
> approaches.

THe other thing is, WHy bother kids if you aren't going to enjoy them? I
couldn't have any, but if I did, esp. when older, the greatest thing
would be going out and watching them explore teh world. One of the best
things about raising birds was seing them do that, explore their world
(huge cage but often, the whole apartment <g!>) and grow and develop. I
just don't see why a lot of people have kids at all, given that many just
ignore tham and bitch about them.

>
>>Anyplace can be a classroom. That's the point that IMO too many
>>poeple miss. THe best IMO is to go out, observe, collect data, and so
>>on, and then come back (to someplace) to discuss it, digest it.
>>
>>
> I home schooled for many years so I'm with you on this one.
>
>>I could never do math because it was never tied to anything - it was
>>just a matter of "shut up and learn it, and if you can't learn it,
>>shut up anyway".
>>
> Nothing like learning multiplication with half cartons of eggs and
> then using those eggs to make omelettes, angel food cakes and etc.
> Can do division with piles of nails...

My Dad taught me fractions like that. Fodd is always a good stimulant
for learnign <LOL!>


>
>> Once i got out of school, I did more math than I ever did in
>>school, because it bacemae a tool rather than just some abstract bit
>>of pedagoguery.
>>
>>
> Carpentry projects are great for kids to learn a little solid
> geometry.

Or even things like Origami, or making models (plastic, paper, wood,
clay, whatever).

The worst way, IMO, is to take active, squirmy kids, slam their butts
down into a chair, and expect them to learn a bunch of rote stuff that
isn't related (byt the instructor) to anything useful or practical or
real.


Posted by Kris Krieger on November 28, 2007, 5:41 pm

>
>
> Kris Krieger wrote:
>
>>I think of going outside, because that is the very first thing you can
>>do with children. Everything else comes later ;)
>>
>>
>
> I think you are absolutely correct.
> http://www.outdoorlab.org/Home2.asp Curricula:
> http://www.outdoorlab.org/learning2.asp This is one example. There
> are many others. And there are guides online for how to design and
> plan your own . Here are a few links:
> http://jeffcoweb.jeffco.k12.co.us/elem/windypeak/proginfo.html
> http://www.clemson.edu/outdoorlab/ and
> http://www.westminster.edu/common/coding/404.cfm show difference in
> approaches.

I've saved the post so I can look those up later (my system is getting
wonky again, IE is really *slow* - must be time to re-re-re-re-re-install
Windows XP =:-p ).

>
>>Anyplace can be a classroom. That's the point that IMO too many
>>poeple miss. THe best IMO is to go out, observe, collect data, and so
>>on, and then come back (to someplace) to discuss it, digest it.
>>
>>
> I home schooled for many years so I'm with you on this one.

My schooling was kind of pathetic, so I srt-of "self-schooled", whihc is
the root of my views on this. ALso, given that my brain doesn't function
"normally/inan average manner", I don't learn well in a classroom
situation, and can't follow long lists of instructions when there is no
overarching principle offered. I learn better from being able to figure
out the principle, and then extrapolate the details/instructions. Which
is great with computer software - people do tend to use similar
principle,s so, once you figure out how one program saves files
(directory structure and all of that), you can pretty easily know how
*any* prog will save files. And so on. IOW, I sort-of have to work
inversely to how most things are taught in a classroom. I learned
Russian from tutors, for example, through speaking, and got good whough
to work with the language after a rather brief time. OTOH, learning
language (German) in a classroom took me at least three times as long,
and that was without having to learn a new alphabet.

OTOH, it seems to me that a lot fo people learn better tha same way. I
don't know about most, but I think that kids who are having "trouble"
with learning are merely having trouble with the teaching methods ;)


>
>>I could never do math because it was never tied to anything - it was
>>just a matter of "shut up and learn it, and if you can't learn it,
>>shut up anyway".
>>
> Nothing like learning multiplication with half cartons of eggs and
> then using those eggs to make omelettes, angel food cakes and etc.
> Can do division with piles of nails...

ANything practical works! Although food is always a good incentive <G!>

>
>> Once i got out of school, I did more math than I ever did in
>>school, because it bacemae a tool rather than just some abstract bit
>>of pedagoguery.
>>
>>
> Carpentry projects are great for kids to learn a little solid
> geometry.

Building anything - kites, scale models, Orogami, paper models - it all
is good, and all you have to do is find out what the child enjoys. IMO,
the buiggest problem with classroom learning is the whole "siddown and
shaddup" thing that so often happens. SOme kids do learn best in a
classroom situation, but certainly not all, and esp. not those who are
more rambunctious or have any sort of quirks (I dislike the term
"disability", because IMO, it is too often considered to be a sort of
absolute thing - rather than a wall, tho', it's more like a bumpy part of
a road that one has to negotiate differently than one negotiates the
smooth part of the road).


[ ... ]


Posted by Kris Krieger on November 29, 2007, 12:44 am

> "Kris Krieger"> wrote
>> My schooling was kind of pathetic, so I srt-of "self-schooled", whihc
>> is the root of my views on this.
>
> My ol' gray haired uncle used to say,
> 'Teach a kid to read then get out of his way. Everything he needs to
> learn is in a book'.
> I agree with the sentiment.

Reading is the foundation for pretty much everything else, becuase one
*can* learn so much from books. When a kid in school, I wondered why we
couldn't just read books an dexplanatory texts, and get tested on that,
because most of the teachers I had pretty much just had us read textbooks,
and thmselves just read their teacher's handbooks - when I asked "odball"
questions (i.e., stuff "normal" kids didn't think to ask, and which had n
oanswers in the teacher's handbooks), it caused problems. So, for me,
books were the best things. Of course, I also didn't learn to read in
school, but at home, so there ya go...




Page 2 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: The value of shopping local November 11, 2007, 12:34 am
Re: The value of shopping local November 13, 2007, 6:50 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:30 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:36 pm
Re: The value of shopping local November 15, 2007, 7:43 pm
Right to have armaments was Re: The value of shopping local November 10, 2007, 7:32 pm
This is a local bar in a town of 300 May 23, 2007, 4:40 pm
How to find a local architect April 18, 2008, 1:15 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap