Home Page link

Re: The value of shopping local

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 4 of 18       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: The value of shopping local Kris Krieger 11-15-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Amy Blankenship on November 16, 2007, 4:09 pm

>
>> "Pat"> wrote
>>
>> There's an aspect of homeschooling known as *unschooling* and this is
>> the process some people go through after leaving the public prisons,
>> er, schools.
>
> Education is not the same thing as the current mess called "the public
> school system". The current ssytem is a bureaucracy first, and second,
> and
> third, and is more of a trianing camp, than an Educational Institution.
>
> I've said time and time again that I am willing to pay for children to be
> *educated* - I am *not* w8illing to pay for them to be merely warehoused
> for 8 hours and trained to follow orders.

I have to say that learning to follow orders is an important skill. In
probably 70% of all jobs, that is at least as important as reading, math,
etc. For life outside work, one also needs to be able to think critically.
However, the main purpose of the educational system is to create good
workers, so training students to take order is a good thing. I think the
educational system is not perfect by any means, but I think it's a good idea
to have the school system at least expose children with the ideas of good
manners and respect for authority.

> Merely being a "good littel worker bee" is not condusive to liberty - but
> being a GLWB is precisely what the "educational" bureaucracy seeks to
> "teach".

It's up to parents to teach children when and how to question authority.
The educational system at its root is to allow the student to become
employable (and so not starve).

> A great many HS Graduates can barely read, can barely do basic arithmetic,
> and can barely think well enough to drive a car. That is not education.
> I
> agree with Pat that Education is a natural right, and that this rightr is
> being denied students.

If you look historically, though, few people could read or do math AT ALL,
and thinking was a luxury for the rich. Is our educational system as good
as it could or should be? Of course not! But completely eliminating it, as
Don suggests, is not the answer. Unless of course it died a natural death
due to people finding better ways to ensure all children get educated.

-Amy



AppliancePartsPros.com, Inc.
Posted by Kris Krieger on November 18, 2007, 2:39 am

>
>>
>>> "Pat"> wrote
>>>
>>> There's an aspect of homeschooling known as *unschooling* and this
>>> is the process some people go through after leaving the public
>>> prisons, er, schools.
>>
>> Education is not the same thing as the current mess called "the
>> public school system". The current ssytem is a bureaucracy first,
>> and second, and
>> third, and is more of a trianing camp, than an Educational
>> Institution.
>>
>> I've said time and time again that I am willing to pay for children
>> to be *educated* - I am *not* w8illing to pay for them to be merely
>> warehoused for 8 hours and trained to follow orders.
>
> I have to say that learning to follow orders is an important skill.
> In probably 70% of all jobs, that is at least as important as reading,
> math, etc.

Foloowing directions is not the same thing as following orders.
Directions exist for a reason. Orders fome from an assumption of
authority which demands unquestioning obedience.

> For life outside work, one also needs to be able to think
> critically. However, the main purpose of the educational system is to
> create good workers, so training students to take order is a good
> thing.

Education should be about much more than training good workers - it
should help establish a framework one can use to achieve self-
fulfillment, self-actualization. If all you want to do is train workers,
don't bother with education, jsut send the kids to work as soon as they
can do something, like knot carpets.

Oh, but wait, that'd be child labor. Well, if all that matters is "good
workers", why is child labor a bad thing?

> I think the educational system is not perfect by any means,

I think it is a disaster for a great many kids.

> but I think it's a good idea to have the school system at least expose
> children with the ideas of good manners and respect for authority.

A lot of "authority" is false; most people "in authority" are idiots.
What one needs to learn, in the current culture, which I never did BTW
since I lack sufficient social instincts, is how to *suck up to*
authority. Following "authority" blindly is not a good habit - liberty,
freedom, and democracy demand far more than that.

Good manners...? Good manners are rooted in civility, which in turn is
rooted in at least some minimal level of empathy for others. Good
manners are, in essence, not a set of rules, but rather, a way of giving
consideration to, being considerate of, others. Rules change from place
to place, so the rules of one place are irrelevant to the rules of
another - but civility, consideration, allow one to *adapt*, as opposed
to merely memorizing sets of rules.

And *adapting* is the important thing. Obedience does not teach one to
adapt, nor do rules, nor does blind obedience to those who claim
authority.

>
>> Merely being a "good littel worker bee" is not condusive to liberty -
>> but being a GLWB is precisely what the "educational" bureaucracy
>> seeks to "teach".
>
> It's up to parents to teach children when and how to question
> authority. The educational system at its root is to allow the student
> to become employable (and so not starve).

Good little worker bees, unquestioning, comfortable in their assigned
pidgeonholes...