Home Page link

Re: To Michael

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: To Michael Michael Bulatovich 02-02-2008
|--> Re: To Michael Michael Bulatov...02-03-2008
|--> Re: To Michael Michael Bulatov...02-03-2008
|--> Paging Mr. D'Jour... Michael Bulatov...03-03-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on February 2, 2008, 5:30 pm
>I apologize for changing the subject line.
> A momentary lapse in judgement caused me to allow your behavior to gauge
> mine and I was wrong for doing that.

It's a glass house after all, eh?

> Wrong is wrong regardless of what others think and do and I know that.
> I won't continue that thread.

Post your political rants an a group where they belong, at least try not to
say bigoted things that will hurt others, and avoid all name calling and you
won't have any trouble from me. I'm a tit for tat guy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_for_tat

Carry on, and so will I. Stop the above and, "Here endeth the lesson."



Posted by ++ on February 2, 2008, 10:41 pm


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>
>
>>I apologize for changing the subject line.
>>A momentary lapse in judgement caused me to allow your behavior to gauge
>>mine and I was wrong for doing that.
>>
>>
>
>It's a glass house after all, eh?
>
>
>
>>Wrong is wrong regardless of what others think and do and I know that.
>>I won't continue that thread.
>>
>>
>
>Post your political rants an a group where they belong, at least try not to
>say bigoted things that will hurt others, and avoid all name calling and you
>won't have any trouble from me. I'm a tit for tat guy.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_for_tat
>
>Carry on, and so will I. Stop the above and, "Here endeth the lesson."
>
>

I personally think that oko za oko, zub na zub is a dangerously bad
phlosophy

>
>
>
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on February 3, 2008, 8:15 am

>
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>
>>>I apologize for changing the subject line.
>>>A momentary lapse in judgement caused me to allow your behavior to gauge
>>>mine and I was wrong for doing that.
>>>
>>
>>It's a glass house after all, eh?
>>
>>
>>>Wrong is wrong regardless of what others think and do and I know that.
>>>I won't continue that thread.
>>>
>>
>>Post your political rants an a group where they belong, at least try not
>>to say bigoted things that will hurt others, and avoid all name calling
>>and you won't have any trouble from me. I'm a tit for tat guy.
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_for_tat
>>
>>Carry on, and so will I. Stop the above and, "Here endeth the lesson."
>
> I personally think that oko za oko, zub na zub is a dangerously bad
> phlosophy

Did you read the link?



Posted by ++ on February 3, 2008, 5:11 pm


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>>
>>I personally think that oko za oko, zub na zub is a dangerously bad
>>phlosophy
>>
>>
>
>Did you read the link?
>
>

No, read my previous post on I have to know pretty much what I'm
clicking on or I don't click with my dialup. Any special about that tit
for tat link I ought to know about?

>
>
>
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on February 3, 2008, 9:41 pm

>
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>>
>>>I personally think that oko za oko, zub na zub is a dangerously bad
>>>phlosophy
>>>
>>
>>Did you read the link?
>
> No, read my previous post on I have to know pretty much what I'm clicking
> on or I don't click with my dialup. Any special about that tit for tat
> link I ought to know about?

An interesting and influential study in game theory from the eighties.



Page 1 of 2       1 2 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Michael... just for you... April 5, 2007, 8:26 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap