Home Page link

Remodeling vs. Rebuilding

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Remodeling vs. Rebuilding dtrostis 03-05-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by dtrostis on March 5, 2007, 12:30 pm
Hi,

I have a case of a client that has a semi-contemporary 1800 sq.ft 4
bedrm. split level, that she recently bought and want to convert it to
a McMansion for sale.

She wants to add a formal dining and living rm, great stairs, turn the
sun room to a library/office, add a 3 car garage with an office/guest
rm above linked with a bridge to the main structure (currently the
house had barely a carport), new kitchen, relocate the entrance, etc.
Also she wants to add a new floor with 4 more bedrooms.

In synthesis, she wants something about a 3500-4000 sq.ft

Analizing the situation and the financial cost of the construction and
the architect services and time to make the remodeling design time, I
almost bought into the idea of demolishing the existing house and
start all over again.

What do you guys think about it.

I want to hear your opinion.


Posted by RicodJour on March 5, 2007, 12:52 pm
dtrostis wrote:
>
> I have a case of a client that has a semi-contemporary 1800 sq.ft 4
> bedrm. split level, that she recently bought and want to convert it to
> a McMansion for sale.
>
> She wants to add a formal dining and living rm, great stairs, turn the
> sun room to a library/office, add a 3 car garage with an office/guest
> rm above linked with a bridge to the main structure (currently the
> house had barely a carport), new kitchen, relocate the entrance, etc.
> Also she wants to add a new floor with 4 more bedrooms.
>
> In synthesis, she wants something about a 3500-4000 sq.ft
>
> Analizing the situation and the financial cost of the construction and
> the architect services and time to make the remodeling design time, I
> almost bought into the idea of demolishing the existing house and
> start all over again.
>
> What do you guys think about it.
>
> I want to hear your opinion.

I'm of the opinion that it depends on the house, the lot and
applicable zoning laws (sometimes if you tear it down they'll make you
conform to the new zoning code) and the desired end result.

If the client's intending to flip the property, fast and cheap is the
way to go, which would tend to point to either remodeling or
rebuilding...depending on the house, lot and desired end result. ;)

R


Posted by 3D Peruna on March 5, 2007, 3:48 pm
What Rico and Don said...

First, find out what zoning allows. Then you'll have the possible
options. If zoning allows tear-down & rebuild, then go that route
(it'll be cheaper in the long run). If not, then you'll need to be
creative and spend more time/money up front and it will cost much more
in time/money to complete the project.


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on March 6, 2007, 4:17 pm

> Hi,
>
> I have a case of a client that has a semi-contemporary 1800 sq.ft 4
> bedrm. split level, that she recently bought and want to convert it to
> a McMansion for sale.
>
> She wants to add a formal dining and living rm, great stairs, turn the
> sun room to a library/office, add a 3 car garage with an office/guest
> rm above linked with a bridge to the main structure (currently the
> house had barely a carport), new kitchen, relocate the entrance, etc.
> Also she wants to add a new floor with 4 more bedrooms.
>
> In synthesis, she wants something about a 3500-4000 sq.ft
>
> Analizing the situation and the financial cost of the construction and
> the architect services and time to make the remodeling design time, I
> almost bought into the idea of demolishing the existing house and
> start all over again.
>
> What do you guys think about it.
>
> I want to hear your opinion.

Notwithstanding the good points made about flipping houses, in my
experience, when it comes down to a pure dollars and cents perspective,
remodeling has always been cheaper. I've been involved in several projects
that began by doing the reno/demo study, and it always came up cheaper to
leave the original in place. It has value, and you don't have to pay tipping
fees to get rid of it.

There are, however, other "costs" to doing things this way, like less than
ideal arrangements, dimensions etc, things being totally out of plumb and
square, and all kinds of formal and technical challenges in trying to marry
the new and the old.
--


MichaelB
www.michaelbulatovich.ca



Similar ThreadsPosted
"Green Building and Remodeling" April 22, 2008, 12:39 am
Important Tips to Remember When Remodeling Your Home September 8, 2007, 7:30 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap