If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by ++ on December 11, 2007, 10:12 pm
AdvocacyNet
News Bulletin 125
*****
Dale Farm Travellers Win Key Concession as Eviction Deadline Approaches
December 11, 2007, Dale Farm, UK and Washington, DC: In a development=20
that could have major implications for the growing international=20
campaign against evictions, the Basildon Council in southeast England=20
appears to be softening its position on the Travellers at the Dale Farm=20
site.
After three years of intimidation and threats against the Travellers,=20
the Council has let it be known that their rights will be considered=20
before any attempt is made to evict them. The shift is reflected in=20
documents submitted to Keith Lomax, the Travellers' lawyer, in advance=20
of a key meeting of the Council=E2=80=99s planning committee this Thursda=
y.=20
(Visit www.advocacynet.org/page/dalefarm=20
<http://www.advocacynet.org/page/dalefarm> for a timeline of the dispute)=
=2E
The development has brought a glimmer of hope to Traveller advocates,=20
who have appealed to the British Red Cross for humanitarian support in=20
the event of a mass eviction, and are even talking to NGOs about setting =
up a Tent City for displaced families.
Thursday's meeting will review a decision by the Council to spend =C2=A33=
=20
million ($6 million) to evict 86 Traveller families (more than 500=20
people) because they live on Green Belt land, which is protected from=20
development. The meeting will also give a sense of how the Council will=20
argue its case before the British High Court, which will review the Dale =
Farm controversy starting February 11, 2008.
The Dale Farm confrontation has come to symbolize Britain's inability to =
integrate Travellers and Gypsies into society, and also served as a=20
litmus test of the larger crisis of housing that afflicts Roma and=20
Gypsies throughout Europe.
Mr Lomax welcomed the prospect of a less confrontational position by the =
Basildon Council. "They appear to be waking up to some of their duties=20
that they have previously ignored," he said. "Miracles could happen."
The Travellers suspect that the Council may be trying to soften its=20
image in advance of the crucial High Court review early next year. But=20
Mr Lomax also pointed out that the Council is required by law to assess=20
how an eviction would affect race relations. A local independent body =E2=
=80=93=20
the Essex Race Equality Council =E2=80=93 is currently collecting data on=
the=20
Travellers, which leaves little doubt that the impact of eviction would=20
be shattering.
Second, new government regulations require that an effort be made to=20
find alternate land for Travellers who are marked for eviction. The=20
Travellers have requested land at a nearby site, Pitsea. This has been=20
rejected by the Basildon Council, but the original idea came from the=20
former Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, and Pitsea is not on Green=20
Belt land. This could make it harder for the Council to maintain a=20
hard-line position.
Mr Lomax said that an approach based on rights is particularly relevant=20
because the Dale Farm Travellers include elderly, disabled and sick.=20
Article 8 of Britain's Human Rights Act calls for the rights of the=20
family to be respected.
Adding to the pressure on the Basildon Council, the Travellers have=20
proved effective advocates at home and abroad. The Children's Legal=20
Centre at Essex University is suing the Basildon Council for releasing=20
private data on the Travellers. Last month sympathizers for the=20
Travellers marched on the British Embassy in Ireland and protested=20
outside the residence of Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
This summer, The Advocacy Project recruited Zach Scott, a US national=20
and student at Georgetown University, to volunteer as a Peace Fellow at=20
Dale Farm =E2=80=93 much to the irritation of local residents. After a lo=
cal=20
newspaper profiled Mr Scott, one reader commented: "Good riddance tree=20
hugger ....DON'T COME BACK IN A HURRY!!!"
But the Basildon Council =E2=80=93 and the British government =E2=80=93 c=
an expect more=20
international pressure if hundreds of women and children are violently=20
evicted from Dale Farm and made homeless. In late October, human rights=20
investigators from the UN and Council of Europe issued a statement=20
deploring the lack of respect for housing rights in Europe. Four leading =
organizations followed up by comparing Dale Farm to several other=20
"serial abuses" in Russia, Romania and elsewhere =E2=80=93 a searing indi=
ctment=20
of British policy.
The latest advocacy tactic by the Travellers is to bring attention to=20
the destruction that always seems to follow evictions by Constant and=20
Company, the firm that has been contracted by the Basildon Council to=20
evacuate Dale Farm. The Travellers are demanding that Constant follow=20
health and safety provisions, and have asked AP to publicize video=20
footage of previous evictions.
If no agreement can be found between the Travellers and Basildon=20
Council, the losing side will likely appeal against the High Court=20
decision in February and the case could eventually go to the House of=20
Lords, the upper house of parliament.
* To support the Travellers of Dale Farm, write to the Basildon Council=20
demanding that alternate land be found: mailroom@basildon.gov.uk=20
* For a timeline of the Dale Farm controversy, and accompanying=20
documents, visit: http://www.advocacynet.org/page/dalefarm
* For blogs by Zach Scott, visit:=20
http://advocacynet.org/blogs/index.php?blog=3D82
* For profiles of Zach Scott and the reaction of local residents visit:=20
http://www.echonews.co.uk/search/display.var..1630933.0.zach_wraps_up_his=
_blog_from_dale_farm.php=20
<http://www.echonews.co.uk/search/display.var.1630933.0.zach_wraps_up_his=
_blog_from_dale_farm.php>
* For the statement by the UN and European human rights investigators,=20
visit:=20
http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/Activities/news2007/071023romahousingri=
ghts_en.asp
#
The Advocacy Project is based in Washington D.C. Phone +1 202 332 3900;=20
fax +1 202 332 4600. Visit the AP website for information about our=20
current projects at www.advocacynet.org <http://www.advocacynet.org>.=20
For questions or comments about the AP and its projects, please email us =
Subscribe to the AP news service with RSS at
http://advocacynet.org/index.php?module=3Dresources&show=3Drss2&id=3D985 =
<http://advocacynet.org/index.php?module=3Dresources&show=3Drss2&id=3D985=
>
|
|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 12, 2007, 9:08 am
AdvocacyNet
News Bulletin 125
*****
Dale Farm Travellers Win Key Concession as Eviction Deadline Approaches
December 11, 2007, Dale Farm, UK and Washington, DC: In a development
that could have major implications for the growing international
campaign against evictions, the Basildon Council in southeast England
appears to be softening its position on the Travellers at the Dale Farm
site.
After three years of intimidation and threats against the Travellers,
the Council has let it be known that their rights will be considered
before any attempt is made to evict them. The shift is reflected in
documents submitted to Keith Lomax, the Travellers' lawyer, in advance
of a key meeting of the Council's planning committee this Thursday.
(Visit www.advocacynet.org/page/dalefarm
<http://www.advocacynet.org/page/dalefarm> for a timeline of the dispute).
The development has brought a glimmer of hope to Traveller advocates,
who have appealed to the British Red Cross for humanitarian support in
the event of a mass eviction, and are even talking to NGOs about setting
up a Tent City for displaced families.
Thursday's meeting will review a decision by the Council to spend £3
million ($6 million) to evict 86 Traveller families (more than 500
people) because they live on Green Belt land, which is protected from
development. The meeting will also give a sense of how the Council will
argue its case before the British High Court, which will review the Dale
Farm controversy starting February 11, 2008.
The Dale Farm confrontation has come to symbolize Britain's inability to
integrate Travellers and Gypsies into society, and also served as a
litmus test of the larger crisis of housing that afflicts Roma and
Gypsies throughout Europe.
<snip>
The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't likely to be
bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by either side.
Tactically the rooted will tend towards stockpiling and fortification, while
the mobile will tend toward lightness, speed and mobility. One side will
seek penetration, while the other side will attempt repulsion. I'm not sure
how one uses the strategies of one side to accommodate the other side
without it being seen as a victory for one and a defeat of the other, unless
one of them is co-opted eventually.
|
|
Posted by RicodJour on December 12, 2007, 11:51 am
>
> The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't likely to be
> bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by either side.
> Tactically the rooted will tend towards stockpiling and fortification, while
> the mobile will tend toward lightness, speed and mobility. One side will
> seek penetration, while the other side will attempt repulsion. I'm not sure
> how one uses the strategies of one side to accommodate the other side
> without it being seen as a victory for one and a defeat of the other, unless
> one of them is co-opted eventually.
Michael, this is a family newsgroup - stop talking dirty.
R
|
|
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 12, 2007, 12:03 pm
>>
>> The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't likely to
>> be
>> bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by either side.
>> Tactically the rooted will tend towards stockpiling and fortification,
>> while
>> the mobile will tend toward lightness, speed and mobility. One side will
>> seek penetration, while the other side will attempt repulsion. I'm not
>> sure
>> how one uses the strategies of one side to accommodate the other side
>> without it being seen as a victory for one and a defeat of the other,
>> unless
>> one of them is co-opted eventually.
>
> Michael, this is a family newsgroup - stop talking dirty.
I would personally abolish *all* families.... ; }
|
|
Posted by ++ on December 12, 2007, 2:10 pm
Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>>The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't likely to
>>>be
>>>bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by either side.
>>>Tactically the rooted will tend towards stockpiling and fortification,
>>>while
>>>the mobile will tend toward lightness, speed and mobility. One side will
>>>seek penetration, while the other side will attempt repulsion. I'm not
>>>sure
>>>how one uses the strategies of one side to accommodate the other side
>>>without it being seen as a victory for one and a defeat of the other,
>>>unless
>>>one of them is co-opted eventually.
>>>
>>>
>>Michael, this is a family newsgroup - stop talking dirty.
>>
>>
>
>I would personally abolish *all* families.... ; }
>
>
Oh, nooooooo................
>
>
>
>
|
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > last >>
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap