Home Page link

Support the Nomads

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 4 of 8       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Support the Nomads ++ 12-11-2007
---> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-12-2007
| |--> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-12-2007
| ---> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-13-2007
| |--> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-13-2007
| ---> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-14-2007
| | `--> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-14-2007
| ---> Re: Support the Nomads Michael Bulatov...12-19-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by ++ on December 15, 2007, 12:24 am


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>
>
>>Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>With today's population, and the requirement of sustaining it, it's only
>>>for a relative few. Nearly all our organizational systems-political and
>>>economic- are based on settlement. It makes me wonder what would happen if
>>>all the predicted displacement due to sea-level change came to pass. Now
>>>we try to "re-settle" 'displaced' people as soon as possible, with the
>>>least disruption to other 'settled' people. Numbers as big as they're
>>>throwing around could not be accommodated in that way...<end idle
>>>speculation>
>>>
>>>
>>You make a solid point leading to the conlcusion that we should all have
>>nomadic, migration planning and minimalist survival skills. We should
>>also all learn to live with less everything.
>>
>>
>
>Sorta like Waterworld?
>
>

too moist

>
>
>
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 13, 2007, 9:24 am

>
>>
>> AdvocacyNet
>> News Bulletin 125
>> *****
>>
>
> [Extensively snipped]
>
>> Dale Farm Travellers Win Key Concession as Eviction Deadline
>> Approaches
>>
>
>> The Dale Farm confrontation has come to symbolize Britain's inability
>> to integrate Travellers and Gypsies into society, and also served as a
>> litmus test of the larger crisis of housing that afflicts Roma and
>> Gypsies throughout Europe.
>
> This is of considerable interest to me and I thank "++" as the OP.
> I and my wife are of Romani descent. I was (among other things) a Planner
> in that benighted country until the opportunity came for us to vote with
> our feet.
>
> The problem is centuries old.
> Common Law rights were significantly curtailed in a particulary obnoxious
> piece of legislation in 1968. This imposed certain obligations on local
> authorities to provide sites for "travellers" and the like, but only if
> they were living in the local authority area. This turned into a carte-
> blanche to move people on to another area. The sites that were provided
> were usually totally unsuitable for the needs of the occupants, and often
> policed oppressively and violently. Deaths occurred as a direct result of
> such actions.
>
> The only site that worked was the one owned by Barbara Cartland, the
> romance writer. Barbara was a bit too 'big' and well-connected to push
> around ....
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't likely
>> to be bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by either
>> side.
>
> The minority in this case had a framework best described as having a
> 'foot in both camps'. Eg be part of the 'world' of the majority but keep
> all the elements of your culture that are valuable and proven (over the
> centuries) to be sustainable.

Do the Romani see assimilation as a threat to their continuation? Usually
when a group manages to have their group identity survive over long periods,
it requires institutions of some kind. Jews have their religion, language
and, of course, their covenant. What do the Romani have that binds them
together for centuries as they move through often hostile host cultures?

When I was a kid there was this family in my dad's ethnic enclave who were
pretty dark for Slavs. You'd think they were south Asian to look at them,
and they were *fabulous* folk dancers and musicians. One day a guy came up
to me and suggested that, on the basis of that, they were 'actually'
"tsigani". Now this guy was an idiot, but they were *really* dark...I've
heard of crypto-Jews...My (Hungarian) godmother thought she was one.

There's a club around the corner that has private events periodically. I saw
a woman standing near one of their posters while the party was obviously on.
I couldn't make out *any* of the language on it, and I usually can, so I
asked what was going on inside: "Romani Party" she said.
--


MichaelB
www.michaelbulatovich.ca



Posted by Troppo on December 14, 2007, 7:23 am

>
>>
>>>
>>> AdvocacyNet
>>> News Bulletin 125
>>> *****
>>>
>>
>> [Extensively snipped]
>>
>>> Dale Farm Travellers Win Key Concession as Eviction Deadline
>>> Approaches
>>>
>>
>>> The Dale Farm confrontation has come to symbolize Britain's
>>> inability to integrate Travellers and Gypsies into society, and also
>>> served as a litmus test of the larger crisis of housing that
>>> afflicts Roma and Gypsies throughout Europe.
>>
>> This is of considerable interest to me and I thank "++" as the OP.
>> I and my wife are of Romani descent. I was (among other things) a
>> Planner in that benighted country until the opportunity came for us
>> to vote with our feet.
>>
>> The problem is centuries old.
>> Common Law rights were significantly curtailed in a particulary
>> obnoxious piece of legislation in 1968. This imposed certain
>> obligations on local authorities to provide sites for "travellers"
>> and the like, but only if they were living in the local authority
>> area. This turned into a carte- blanche to move people on to another
>> area. The sites that were provided were usually totally unsuitable
>> for the needs of the occupants, and often policed oppressively and
>> violently. Deaths occurred as a direct result of such actions.
>>
>> The only site that worked was the one owned by Barbara Cartland, the
>> romance writer. Barbara was a bit too 'big' and well-connected to
>> push around ....
>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> The fundamental divide between the mobile and the rooted isn't
>>> likely to be bridged with a conceptual framework devised solely by
>>> either side.
>>
>> The minority in this case had a framework best described as having a
>> 'foot in both camps'. Eg be part of the 'world' of the majority but
>> keep all the elements of your culture that are valuable and proven
>> (over the centuries) to be sustainable.
>
> Do the Romani see assimilation as a threat to their continuation?

Not easy to answer. Assimilation has been attempted for centuries, but
the Roma go on. Take religious belief for example. "It is said" of my
particular branch tribe of the so-called 16 tribes, that they originally
followed the religion of "Zoster" (Zoroaster). When they arrived in
Europe, they used the name Ahkbar. This had been appropriate for passing
through Islamic territories, but unhelpful, as now, in western Europe.
When significant numbers began arriving in Europe, one "Duke Michael"
(possibly Baro Mirza) actually got a dispensation from the Pope on the
basis of a commitment to undertake continuous pilgrimage, as a penace for
"having turned away from Christianity". Good one. In feudal Europe
pilgrimage was the only acceptable excuse for moving around - cf
Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. It also helped, for a while, to soften the
potential for jealousy; "ordinary" people didn't have horses, and many
were not permitted to keep dogs.

> Usually when a group manages to have their group identity survive over
> long periods, it requires institutions of some kind. Jews have their
> religion, language and, of course, their covenant. What do the Romani
> have that binds them together for centuries as they move through often
> hostile host cultures?

With religion, you go with the flow. There is the 'Kris' or Council of
elders, but that tends to be a fairly fluid, contingent arrangement.
Usually, anyone called a "leader" or "king" is described as such for the
ease and comfort of the host population, but there have been exceptions.
In Romania, Jan Ciob declared himself King of the Gypsies and even got
himself crowned as such in a church. (One of his brothers took exception
to this, went back to Romania from the US, and declared himself Emperor.)
The Dictator Nicolae Ceausescu (who gave everyone a bad time) was
terrified of Jan, used to have nightmares that he was coming down the
corridor to kill him. So Ceausescu maybe was a bit easier with Jan's
people. I met someone who had met Jan; they described him as having "the
wildest eyes I have ever seen in another human being". Seems that his
daughter and granddaughter are carrying on the good work ...

> When I was a kid there was this family in my dad's ethnic enclave who
> were pretty dark for Slavs. You'd think they were south Asian to look
> at them, and they were *fabulous* folk dancers and musicians. One day
> a guy came up to me and suggested that, on the basis of that, they
> were 'actually' "tsigani". Now this guy was an idiot, but they were
> *really* dark...I've heard of crypto-Jews...My (Hungarian) godmother
> thought she was one.

He was probably right. Often Roma are thought to be Jews, and the error
can be useful. A lot of Roma were/are horse-trainers and wranglers in
Holliwood, and were thought to be American Indians. Here in Australia one
of our sons used to be asked if he was part-Aboriginal when he was a
school kid. Useful if they happened to have caught some undersized fish.
(Different 'rules' apply to indigenous people.)
.
> There's a club around the corner that has private events periodically.
> I saw a woman standing near one of their posters while the party was
> obviously on. I couldn't make out *any* of the language on it, and I
> usually can, so I asked what was going on inside: "Romani Party" she
> said.

Could have been in a European language, but might have been Romanes -
Sanscrit-based. Often used to justify an origin in the Indian sub-
continent. However, Sanscrit originated as Phoenician. The Phoenicians
were the traders of the early middle-eastern world, so if you traded,
Phoenician was the language you used.
400km south of here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, there are the
remains of a sea port, and carvings that are recognisable as Phoenician.

Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 14, 2007, 8:52 am

>
>> Do the Romani see assimilation as a threat to their continuation?
>
> Not easy to answer. Assimilation has been attempted for centuries, but
> the Roma go on. Take religious belief for example. "It is said" of my
> particular branch tribe of the so-called 16 tribes, that they originally
> followed the religion of "Zoster" (Zoroaster).

That places them in Persia, doesn't it?

>> Usually when a group manages to have their group identity survive over
>> long periods, it requires institutions of some kind. Jews have their
>> religion, language and, of course, their covenant. What do the Romani
>> have that binds them together for centuries as they move through often
>> hostile host cultures?
>
> With religion, you go with the flow. There is the 'Kris' or Council of
> elders, but that tends to be a fairly fluid, contingent arrangement.
> Usually, anyone called a "leader" or "king" is described as such for the
> ease and comfort of the host population, but there have been exceptions.
> In Romania, Jan Ciob declared himself King of the Gypsies and even got
> himself crowned as such in a church. (One of his brothers took exception
> to this, went back to Romania from the US, and declared himself Emperor.)
> The Dictator Nicolae Ceausescu (who gave everyone a bad time) was
> terrified of Jan, used to have nightmares that he was coming down the
> corridor to kill him. So Ceausescu maybe was a bit easier with Jan's
> people. I met someone who had met Jan; they described him as having "the
> wildest eyes I have ever seen in another human being". Seems that his
> daughter and granddaughter are carrying on the good work ...

He obviously didn't watch the Maple Leafs:

http://images.tsn.ca/images/stories/20040121/tucker_572.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/39pdk7
http://tinyurl.com/38awuq
http://tinyurl.com/356ym8


>> When I was a kid there was this family in my dad's ethnic enclave who
>> were pretty dark for Slavs. You'd think they were south Asian to look
>> at them, and they were *fabulous* folk dancers and musicians. One day
>> a guy came up to me and suggested that, on the basis of that, they
>> were 'actually' "tsigani". Now this guy was an idiot, but they were
>> *really* dark...I've heard of crypto-Jews...My (Hungarian) godmother
>> thought she was one.
>
> He was probably right. Often Roma are thought to be Jews, and the error
> can be useful. A lot of Roma were/are horse-trainers and wranglers in
> Holliwood, and were thought to be American Indians. Here in Australia one
> of our sons used to be asked if he was part-Aboriginal when he was a
> school kid. Useful if they happened to have caught some undersized fish.
> (Different 'rules' apply to indigenous people.)
> .
>> There's a club around the corner that has private events periodically.
>> I saw a woman standing near one of their posters while the party was
>> obviously on. I couldn't make out *any* of the language on it, and I
>> usually can, so I asked what was going on inside: "Romani Party" she
>> said.
>
> Could have been in a European language,

I'm familiar enough with all but Hungarian and Finish to extract a word or
two from just about any european language. If it was European, it was
Hungarian.

> but might have been Romanes -
> Sanscrit-based. Often used to justify an origin in the Indian sub-
> continent. However, Sanscrit originated as Phoenician. The Phoenicians
> were the traders of the early middle-eastern world, so if you traded,
> Phoenician was the language you used.
> 400km south of here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, there are the
> remains of a sea port, and carvings that are recognisable as Phoenician.

That's interesting. Any links?



Posted by ++ on December 14, 2007, 1:48 pm


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>>>Do the Romani see assimilation as a threat to their continuation?
>>>
>>>
Endangered peoples not so much by reason of assimilation but
marginalization: http://www.errc.org/English_index.php

>That places them in Persia, doesn't it?
>
>
Last ruling group of Zoroastrians in post Islamic/Turkish times in
nowadays Iran, but pre Selcuk, was the Buyids. Their civilization
predates only slightly some of the Roma migrations to Europe along an
already established trade route. Something to consider. Are Troppo's
ancestors Buyids?

Buyids had an astounding architecture, what few building remain:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buwayhid
https://edit.britannica.com/getEditableToc?tocId=32168
http://www.bartleby.com/65/bu/Buyid.html
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0078-6527(1965%2F1966)18%3C143%3AMOUTBO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/Gilgamesh/buyid.html

Unfortunately, a lot written has an incredible Iranian bias.

It should be carefully considered that Buyid metalwork closely resembles
in technique and quality of craftsmanship, Roma metalwork which begins
to appear after there were establish Roma metalworking centers (ex. Tula)

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0732-2992(1983)1%3C69%3ATOPANA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23

See the following for some Sassanian Buyid links:

http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Architecture/sasanian_palaces_islam.htm

Note from the second article that although we have little surviving
Buyid architecture, we know absoltuely that Selcuk architecture was
(poorly, in terms of craftsmanship) imitative in every respect from
metalwork to brickwork. And that is glorious enough.

http://archnet.org/library/sites/sites.jsp?letter=&country_code=&place_id=&type=&style=Buyid&usage=&century=&decade=&order_by=site&showdescription=1

or http://tinyurl.com/ytmc94

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/06/wai/hod_40.170.176.htm (enlarge the
pattern once you are there)

http://tinyurl.com/35aftf

(I am having a hard time finding material online....that I want to show)

http://www.essential-architecture.com/ASIA-WEST/WA-IR/WA-IR-001.htm

Note elements inroduced for the first time by Buyids that we take for
granted in Islamic architecture today. Also note the connection between
Egyptian and Iranian architecture in the use of monumental iwans which
were (because of the Turkish propensity) doubled during the Selcuks.

http://tinyurl.com/2bl4x7 is another general page or two on the topic.
search other pages of Ettinghausen.

What happened to the Buyids of Iran and Iraq after expulsion?



>
>
>I'm familiar enough with all but Hungarian and Finish to extract a word or
>two from just about any european language. If it was European, it was
>Hungarian.
>
>
>
>>but might have been Romanes -
>>Sanscrit-based. Often used to justify an origin in the Indian sub-
>>continent. However, Sanscrit originated as Phoenician. The Phoenicians
>>were the traders of the early middle-eastern world, so if you traded,
>>Phoenician was the language you used.
>>400km south of here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, there are the
>>remains of a sea port, and carvings that are recognisable as Phoenician.
>>
>>
>
>That's interesting. Any links?
>
>
>
>
>


Page 4 of 8       < 1 2 3 > last >>

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap