Home Page link

The Love of a Building

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 3 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
The Love of a Building Warm Worm 02-09-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Warm Worm on February 11, 2008, 10:10 pm
Don wrote:
>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>>> There's a building that I'm in love with. It's not perfect, but it has
>>>>>> character, and an uncommon beauty, whimsy and delight all its own, and
>>>>>> I see much of my own character in it as well-- although I'm unsure if
>>>>>> its architects would agree.
>>>>> Picture? (Building, not you.)
>>>> Ironically, the building is a metaphor for a woman.
>>> Picture?
>> It might be nice, if only for historical reference.
>>
>> How do we choose that which we love, assuming we do?
>
> It starts with a spark and then its fanned into an inferno that gradually
> winds down to a slow burn.

Ideally I suppose.

>> And in that regard, can the heart do battle with the mind and vice-versa?
>
> My dad told me long ago that people should not get married when they are in
> love because they are insane at that time.

Oddly enough, that seems to make sense, especially if we assume that it
isn't really love, just insanity. ;D
Do you think love conquers all? I mean, would it conquer marriage and
the intricacies of living together?

> Looking at the dismal record on marriages of late I'm inclined to agree.
> In the movie Shenandoah, Jimmie Stewart told a young man that he should
> become friends with his intended before falling in love with her.

Sounds like the head talking... What if it's love at first sight? Do you
believe in love at first sight?
I wonder how many couples are/were actually in love, or know what it is.

> He said he was married to his wife, his best friend, for several years
> before he realized he was in love with her.

I'm beginning to think that there might be something to that-- the idea
that one can be in love, but not realize it, say until something changes
that suddenly confronts the issue.

> Good flik, check it out.

There's a torrent available.

Posted by Kris Krieger on February 12, 2008, 12:02 pm

> Don wrote:
>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>>>> There's a building that I'm in love with. It's not perfect, but
>>>>>>> it has character, and an uncommon beauty, whimsy and delight all
>>>>>>> its own, and I see much of my own character in it as well--
>>>>>>> although I'm unsure if its architects would agree.
>>>>>> Picture? (Building, not you.)
>>>>> Ironically, the building is a metaphor for a woman.
>>>> Picture?
>>> It might be nice, if only for historical reference.
>>>
>>> How do we choose that which we love, assuming we do?
>>
>> It starts with a spark and then its fanned into an inferno that
>> gradually winds down to a slow burn.
>
> Ideally I suppose.
>
>>> And in that regard, can the heart do battle with the mind and
>>> vice-versa?
>>
>> My dad told me long ago that people should not get married when they
>> are in love because they are insane at that time.
>
> Oddly enough, that seems to make sense, especially if we assume that
> it isn't really love, just insanity. ;D
> Do you think love conquers all? I mean, would it conquer marriage and
> the intricacies of living together?

Depends upon what one means by love. Being "in love" is usually actually
infatuation, excitement with the New, and sexual atraction. It's not
sustainable. The development of long-term love depends upon the
individuals, upon htei rindividual capacity for that different sort fo
love. IMO, aprt fo it is emotional and part is intellectual, but then,
everyone always tells me that I "overintellectualize" - OTOH, I've been
in a stable and rewarding relationship for 30 years.


>
>> Looking at the dismal record on marriages of late I'm inclined to
>> agree. In the movie Shenandoah, Jimmie Stewart told a young man that
>> he should become friends with his intended before falling in love
>> with her.
>
> Sounds like the head talking... What if it's love at first sight? Do
> you believe in love at first sight?

Not first sight, but I do know that sometimes, two people just fit
together, compliment each other not only emotionally, but also
intellectually, physically, and , dare Isay it?, spiritually, in terms of
"weltanshau" or basic/fundamental philosophy.

> I wonder how many couples are/were actually in love, or know what it
> is.

A lot fo people have *plans* - meet someone at this age, marry at that
age, have kids X years later, and so on. ANd have specific ideas
concernign the type of person who would fit in with those plans, i.e.
whom they could "love".

The test of love is when those plans hit the skids. Maybe one person is
infertile, maybe one turns out to be gay, maybe one says "I have to give
up this damn rat race, and move to the middle of Alaska" - most people
would react in a predictable way, and that way proves that, by and large,
love is *not* unconditional, not by any stretch; a lot of "love" is as
above, how well two peole's plans mesh.

I'm not even saying that these plans are conscious - many times, poeple
are so non-introspective that they have no idea what their own
motivations really are. And those plans can be completely sub-conscious
- then they're called "expectations".

IOW, most people, IMO, do not separate the reality of love, from the
fantasy of love, and bya nad large, taht fantasy isn't even their own,
doesn't even spring from their own souls, but rather, are inculcated
socioculturally.

>
>> He said he was married to his wife, his best friend, for several
>> years before he realized he was in love with her.
>
> I'm beginning to think that there might be something to that-- the
> idea that one can be in love, but not realize it, say until something
> changes that suddenly confronts the issue.

That's because part of the fantasy of love is that it *always* MUST start
off as obsessive infatuation, as irresistable sexual passion.


Posted by Warm Worm on February 17, 2008, 7:27 am
Don wrote:
>> Don wrote:
>>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>>>>> There's a building that I'm in love with. It's not perfect, but it
>>>>>>>> has character, and an uncommon beauty, whimsy and delight all its
>>>>>>>> own, and I see much of my own character in it as well-- although I'm
>>>>>>>> unsure if its architects would agree.
>>>>>>> Picture? (Building, not you.)
>>>>>> Ironically, the building is a metaphor for a woman.
>>>>> Picture?
>>>> It might be nice, if only for historical reference.
>>>>
>>>> How do we choose that which we love, assuming we do?
>>> It starts with a spark and then its fanned into an inferno that gradually
>>> winds down to a slow burn.
>> Ideally I suppose.
>>
>>>> And in that regard, can the heart do battle with the mind and
>>>> vice-versa?
>>> My dad told me long ago that people should not get married when they are
>>> in love because they are insane at that time.
>>
>> Oddly enough, that seems to make sense, especially if we assume that it
>> isn't really love, just insanity. ;D
>> Do you think love conquers all?
>
> I think a persons attitude about it can change over time and according to
> circumstances.
> One thing I'll mention, having been with my wife for so long now, my view
> cannot be similar to yours.
> Another thing, and I remember it well, the years of being distracted by the
> challenge of *finding someone* way back when before I found her.

What/Who were you looking for, what were the strategies involved, and
was it different from what it would be now if you were single again, and
how would it be if so? IOW, can, say, your concepts of, and capacities
for love, evolve along with your age and experience, and would the
results and the resulting person chosen be different? And who chooses who?

> In the long view, yes, love can conquer all and its a supreme example of *2
> heads are better than one*.

Makes sense.

> I mean, would it conquer marriage and the intricacies of living together?
>
> I no longer associate marriage with love.
> If I knew then what I know now my wife and I would never have married.
> We would, instead, have formed a corporation, a legal body disassociated
> from our *feelings*.

That's an interesting take and seems to have some relevance to my above
questions.

> We came very close to calling it quits one time, lawyers were hired.
> Its a crime the way the legal body takes a union based in feelings and
> converts it to dollar signs right before your eyes.
> Like watching everything you believed to be real dissolved in real time and
> there's nothing you can do about it.
> Freefalling.

Traumatic.

>>> Looking at the dismal record on marriages of late I'm inclined to agree.
>>> In the movie Shenandoah,

Just got it and will be viewing it shortly.

>>> Jimmie Stewart told a young man that he should become friends with his
intended before falling in love with her.
>>
>> Sounds like the head talking... What if it's love at first sight?
>
> What you mean is *infatuation* at first sight, or *lust* at first sight.
> Love takes time, there is no way around it.

Understood, although I suppose that the time component might be
"adaptively re-usable"-- a love template.

> Unfortunately, some people don't learn this until they're waste deep in a
> situation and all sorts of ties that bind have to be severed, including
> kids.

For each successive generation, everything has to be
re-taught/learned... Everything's new again.
I wonder if it will ever be possible to upload knowledge or wisdom into
a brain.

> Can't speak for others but in my hindsite I was strongly attracted
> physically to my wife.
> Qucikly I started to learn about the person inside.
> I was hungry, in all ways, but very stupid, er, naive.
> No one should get permanently attached to another until they are 30 years
> old and after they have known the person for more than a year.
> Just my opinion.

Better safe than sorry I suppose, but the above seems all part of life
anyway, part of the experience of learning and making mistakes along the
way.
If regret is part and parcel of that, where flops are rites-of-passage,
then maybe there shouldn't be any regret.

> Anyone can sail through the good times with a smile on their face but its
> the rough times that builds mettle and apparently its during those times
> that many people throw in the towel.
> When the going gets tough the tough get going.

It looks that way... Many people seem too scared to ask, say, know, or
experience.

> You know how when you're walking down an aisle in a busy mall for example
> and someone is walking toward you and you realize that if *you* don't move
> to the side a little that person will run into you?
> Daily I see things like that in our marriage, where I have to step aside
> slightly and let her pass.
> I'm sure my wife does that with me too, but I'm unaware of it.
> We can try to see things through other's eyes but we can't live inside their
> life and there's a difference.
>
>>> He said he was married to his wife, his best friend, for several years
>>> before he realized he was in love with her.
>>
>> I'm beginning to think that there might be something to that-- the idea
>> that one can be in love, but not realize it, say until something changes
>> that suddenly confronts the issue.
>
> For me it the idea that being away from my wife is worse than being with
> her.
> If she left me today I would still be very much concerned for her welfare in
> that she'd probably have to get a restraining order on me.
> I hate being that way, but I think thats how I'd be.
> Maybe I'm wrong.
>
> Think of it as a jigsaw puzzle.
> In the beginning we were 2 pieces that fit very well and over the years we
> kept adding pieces to where today we are a 10,000 piece puzzle and all the
> pieces fit tightly.

Should I be so lucky... Thanks for the thoughtful replies, BTW. I had a
rough week, but feel better.

> ----------------------------
>
> Like a million little doorways
> All the choices we made
> All the stages we passed through
> All the roles we played
>
> For so many different directions
> Our separate paths might have turned
> With every door that we opened
> Every bridge that we burned
>
> Somehow we find each other
> Through all that masquerade
> Somehow we found each other
> Somehow we have stayed
> In a state of grace
>
> I don't believe in destiny
> Or the guiding hand of fate
> I don't believe in forever
> Or love as a mystical state
> I don't believe in the stars or the planets
> Or angels watching from above
> But I believe there's a ghost of a chance we can find someone to love
> And make it last...
>
> Like a million little crossroads
> Through the back streets of youth
> Each time we turn a new corner
> A tiny moment of truth
>
> For so many different connections
> Our separate paths might have made
> With every door that we opened
> Every game we played
>
> Somehow we find each other
> Through all that masquerade
> Somehow we found each other
> Somehow we have stayed
> In a state of grace
>
> I don't believe in destiny
> Or the guiding hand of fate
> I don't believe in forever
> Or love as a mystical state
> I don't believe in the stars or the planets
> Or angels watching from above
> But I believe there's a ghost of a chance we can find someone to love
> And make it last...
> http://tinyurl.com/yrnogx

Ah yes, Rush (I assume)... Good production, sound, and a decent tune.

...A ghost of a chance ay?

(flips coin)

Posted by Kris Krieger on February 12, 2008, 11:42 am

> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>> There's a building that I'm in love with. It's not perfect, but it
>>>>> has character, and an uncommon beauty, whimsy and delight all its
>>>>> own, and I see much of my own character in it as well-- although
>>>>> I'm unsure if its architects would agree.
>>>> Picture? (Building, not you.)
>>> Ironically, the building is a metaphor for a woman.
>>
>> Picture?
>
> It might be nice, if only for historical reference.
>
> How do we choose that which we love, assuming we do?

THat question probbly has as many answers as thre are people on the
planet; to answer it, you can't look at what others do, you have to look
deeply *and honestly* into yourself and explore your own motivations,
desires, responses, and so on.

> And in that regard, can the heart do battle with the mind and
> vice-versa?
>

Do they actually battle? Or it is just that the superego, that part of
us which is created by society, tells us to not be who we are and to not
want what we want, because we're "supposed" to be, and want, what we are
told to be and want? Society teaches us to present a persona, because ti
is our "duty", our "obligation" - we are supposed to do and be what
society tells us we "should" do and be - i.e. present a persona rather
than to honestly be a person.

That screws up relationships, because the whole dating game, with its
little rituals, is designed to encourage the persona while relegating the
person to the distant background. Ritualized behaviors, such as a male
bird presentign a female with bits of nesting material and/or plump
insects, work for other animals, but with humans, it's eventually a
hindrance, because all too often, people marry the personas, and then
start having problems when it becomes inpossible to live a facade 24/7
and the real person comes out - then people wail, "You're just not the
same person I married!" Well, of course not, all of the rituals are
designed to set up baby-making couples, NOT form the basis of emotional
imtimacy.

One of the offshoots of the dependence upon ritual is thae perennial, and
perennially stupid, question of "What do women/men really want?" Such a
wuestion assumes that ALL women and ALL men are simple, are
simplistically capable only of following instinctual patterns. THe fact
is that humans have *drives*, but not *instincts* - an instinct is a
specific bahavior that is inborn, i.e. carried out by compulsion AND
*exactly the same* in all members of a species - even if an animal is
raised in isolation, it will still attempt to carry out the stereotypical
behaviors; learning from other members refines behaviors but the
bahaviors are largely intact.

Humans are not that simple. So it's not just a simplistic matter of
"give gift, get sex" for males and "give sex in return for child
support" for females. What a woman wants depends upon the individual
woman; what a man wants depends upon the individual man.

Re: specific cases? I dunno, it depends upon the people involved. And I
don't have any intuitive understandiing of people, just facts and
theories.






Posted by EDS on February 14, 2008, 12:48 pm




>
>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>>>> There's a building that I'm in love with. It's not perfect, but it
>>>>>> has character, and an uncommon beauty, whimsy and delight all its
>>>>>> own, and I see much of my own character in it as well-- although
>>>>>> I'm unsure if its architects would agree.
>>>>> Picture? (Building, not you.)
>>>> Ironically, the building is a metaphor for a woman.
>>>
>>> Picture?
>>
>> It might be nice, if only for historical reference.
>>
>> How do we choose that which we love, assuming we do?
>
> THat question probbly has as many answers as thre are people on the
> planet; to answer it, you can't look at what others do, you have to look
> deeply *and honestly* into yourself and explore your own motivations,
> desires, responses, and so on.
>
>> And in that regard, can the heart do battle with the mind and
>> vice-versa?
>>
>
> Do they actually battle? Or it is just that the superego, that part of
> us which is created by society, tells us to not be who we are and to not
> want what we want, because we're "supposed" to be, and want, what we are
> told to be and want? Society teaches us to present a persona, because ti
> is our "duty", our "obligation" - we are supposed to do and be what
> society tells us we "should" do and be - i.e. present a persona rather
> than to honestly be a person.
>
> That screws up relationships, because the whole dating game, with its
> little rituals, is designed to encourage the persona while relegating the
> person to the distant background. Ritualized behaviors, such as a male
> bird presentign a female with bits of nesting material and/or plump
> insects, work for other animals, but with humans, it's eventually a
> hindrance, because all too often, people marry the personas, and then
> start having problems when it becomes inpossible to live a facade 24/7
> and the real person comes out - then people wail, "You're just not the
> same person I married!" Well, of course not, all of the rituals are
> designed to set up baby-making couples, NOT form the basis of emotional
> imtimacy.
>
> One of the offshoots of the dependence upon ritual is thae perennial, and
> perennially stupid, question of "What do women/men really want?" Such a
> wuestion assumes that ALL women and ALL men are simple, are
> simplistically capable only of following instinctual patterns. THe fact
> is that humans have *drives*, but not *instincts* - an instinct is a
> specific bahavior that is inborn, i.e. carried out by compulsion AND
> *exactly the same* in all members of a species - even if an animal is
> raised in isolation, it will still attempt to carry out the stereotypical
> behaviors; learning from other members refines behaviors but the
> bahaviors are largely intact.
>
> Humans are not that simple. So it's not just a simplistic matter of
> "give gift, get sex" for males and "give sex in return for child
> support" for females. What a woman wants depends upon the individual
> woman; what a man wants depends upon the individual man.
>
> Re: specific cases? I dunno, it depends upon the people involved. And I
> don't have any intuitive understandiing of people, just facts and
> theories.
>
>

Met my wife in January '64 and we married in July of '64. Back then we were
considered old at 28 and 27 years. Going on 44 years now. Invited our
parents to our wedding the weekend before. Simple and economical. The
wedding business made nothing from us.
EDS




Page 3 of 6       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
I'd love to get a fly through of this.... June 13, 2007, 4:13 pm
neighbourly love vented April 13, 2007, 10:13 pm
Buildings I had to love when I was in school, and why. April 15, 2007, 1:32 pm
Buildings I had to love when I was in school, and why... April 15, 2007, 1:35 pm
Building Construction - Issue Of Building Permits (Victoria) June 17, 2007, 5:27 am
Looking for pictures of the Seagram Building / Bilder vom Seagram Building gesucht April 6, 2007, 12:33 pm
I'm looking for a building January 12, 2008, 6:32 am
I'm looking for a building January 12, 2008, 6:33 am
Please help - where is this building? November 25, 2008, 11:21 am
Exterior building February 9, 2007, 7:33 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap