Home Page link

The Oldest Architecture?

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 2 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
The Oldest Architecture? Michael Bulatovich 01-18-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by ++ on January 20, 2008, 8:57 am


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>
>
>>Jude Alexander wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Thanks for the link. Seems logical that there were lesser refined
>>>buildings (as these buildings are fairly refined) before people starting
>>>improving on their skills.
>>>
>>>
>>Or that buildings being in done in quite different materials were being
>>replicated in stone. One example of this is the so-called Hellenistic
>>carvings of furniture and architectural elements like beams in the caves
>>of Bamiyan (probably blown up along with the Buddhas under the Taliban)
>>and similar elements in "Desert Cathay". They were simply, in the first
>>millenium BC, a way of expressing quite another kind of home to the cave's
>>somewhat sophisticated inhabitants
>>
>>
>
>Probably so, but I think the point is that if they could do this in *ninth*
>millenium BC, it probably points to an even earlier mastery of acrhitectural
>technology, and even this site is pushing backwards the assumed date and
>circumstances when this technology was developed.
>
>

That was also my obvious point as well, in support of your statement.
If someone is making a fake beam look like an hellenistically carved
beam that would normally be in a wooden house, then that person has seen
and possibly even constructed the wooden house before moving into Mr. cave.

>The fact that people were doing amazing buildings so far back is one thing,
>but I really find it much more curious that this site was *intentionaly
>buried*. I'm not sure of the date of covering, but even if animals were
>domesticated by then, it must have been a huge undertaking, and of great
>significance. Any bored fool can destroy stuff, but to *bury* it intact must
>have had meaning that we can only guess at for now.
>
>
When you go in the caves in the volcanic area of Cappadocia in Turkey,
itentionally buring prevoius parts are a ay of shoring up the tufa.Some
of the Hittite chambers are incredibly far underground but stairways and
etc. could undermine chambers built higher with airways.

>Anyway, I'm glad Klaus Schmidt didn't quit school at twelve, and I hope he
>pieces the whole story together. My habitual structural engineer is a Turk
>( ..and my kid's best friend is an Shqiptar!
>

Albanian. Considered pejorative term by anyone other than.

>) and he says that Asia Minor
>is so littered with ancient sites that they themselves barely knew anything
>about it when he was coming up in school. He just came back from a business
>trip to Istanbul and says they're building, with permits, a Four Seasons
>hotel on a known Roman site in the city. You wonder how much of this stuff
>will get dozed in the name of progress before they realize what that word
>means after you all have dishwashers and cars and iPods.
>
>

A lot is underground. Cisterns and such. Probably Four Seasons in near
there and the underground is so vast that it is almost impossible to
avoid. What is worse in archeology and architetural history is
literally rasing areas. An incredible lot of Byzantine architecture was
rased to present a "pristine" Acropolis in Athens I was literally
shocked at some of the site drawings and photos associated with the
archaeology done there.

>
>
>
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on January 20, 2008, 9:28 am

>
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>
>>>Jude Alexander wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the link. Seems logical that there were lesser refined
>>>>buildings (as these buildings are fairly refined) before people starting
>>>>improving on their skills.
>>>>
>>>Or that buildings being in done in quite different materials were being
>>>replicated in stone. One example of this is the so-called Hellenistic
>>>carvings of furniture and architectural elements like beams in the caves
>>>of Bamiyan (probably blown up along with the Buddhas under the Taliban)
>>>and similar elements in "Desert Cathay". They were simply, in the first
>>>millenium BC, a way of expressing quite another kind of home to the
>>>cave's somewhat sophisticated inhabitants
>>>
>>
>>Probably so, but I think the point is that if they could do this in
>>*ninth* millenium BC, it probably points to an even earlier mastery of
>>acrhitectural technology, and even this site is pushing backwards the
>>assumed date and circumstances when this technology was developed.
>>
>
> That was also my obvious point as well, in support of your statement. If
> someone is making a fake beam look like an hellenistically carved beam
> that would normally be in a wooden house, then that person has seen and
> possibly even constructed the wooden house before moving into Mr. cave.
>
>>The fact that people were doing amazing buildings so far back is one
>>thing, but I really find it much more curious that this site was
>>*intentionaly buried*. I'm not sure of the date of covering, but even if
>>animals were domesticated by then, it must have been a huge undertaking,
>>and of great significance. Any bored fool can destroy stuff, but to *bury*
>>it intact must have had meaning that we can only guess at for now.
>>
> When you go in the caves in the volcanic area of Cappadocia in Turkey,
> itentionally buring prevoius parts are a ay of shoring up the tufa.Some of
> the Hittite chambers are incredibly far underground but stairways and etc.
> could undermine chambers built higher with airways.


Maybe, but this is a freestanding mound above the area's datum. They piled
earth up and over exostong buildings.

>>Anyway, I'm glad Klaus Schmidt didn't quit school at twelve, and I hope he
>>pieces the whole story together. My habitual structural engineer is a Turk
>>( ..and my kid's best friend is an Shqiptar!
>
> Albanian. Considered pejorative term by anyone other than.

Like the "N word"? I thought it was the "Albanian" word for an ethnic
"Albanian."
Wiki says the word is actually, "Shqiptarėt", so Shqiptar is probably a Serb
derivative.


>>) and he says that Asia Minor is so littered with ancient sites that they
>>themselves barely knew anything about it when he was coming up in school.
>>He just came back from a business trip to Istanbul and says they're
>>building, with permits, a Four Seasons hotel on a known Roman site in the
>>city. You wonder how much of this stuff will get dozed in the name of
>>progress before they realize what that word means after you all have
>>dishwashers and cars and iPods.
>
> A lot is underground. Cisterns and such. Probably Four Seasons in near
> there and the underground is so vast that it is almost impossible to
> avoid. What is worse in archeology and architetural history is literally
> rasing areas. An incredible lot of Byzantine architecture was rased to
> present a "pristine" Acropolis in Athens I was literally shocked at some
> of the site drawings and photos associated with the archaeology done
> there.

Links?



Posted by ++ on January 20, 2008, 10:00 pm


Michael Bulatovich wrote:

>Maybe, but this is a freestanding mound above the area's datum. They pil=
ed=20
>earth up and over exostong buildings.
> =20
>

If they wanted to save it, htey might have done.

>Like the "N word"?=20
>
No, because alone it is not pejorative. It is mroe like "Polack", semi=20
jocular in the Polish mouth but unwanted by anyone else.

>I thought it was the "Albanian" word for an ethnic=20
>"Albanian."
>Wiki says the word is actually, "Shqiptar=EBt", so Shqiptar is probably =
a Serb=20
>derivative.
>
> =20
>
>
>
>Links?=20
> =20
>

No, just been there a number of times. For example, I have visited=20
every building of the Selcuk period, most of the Byzantine (if I was=20
allowed into converted structures) AND every building of Selim in=20
Istanbul and surrounds.

Big fan

>
>
> =20
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on January 24, 2008, 6:30 pm

>
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>
>>>Jude Alexander wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the link. Seems logical that there were lesser refined
>>>>buildings (as these buildings are fairly refined) before people starting
>>>>improving on their skills.
>>>>
>>>Or that buildings being in done in quite different materials were being
>>>replicated in stone. One example of this is the so-called Hellenistic
>>>carvings of furniture and architectural elements like beams in the caves
>>>of Bamiyan (probably blown up along with the Buddhas under the Taliban)
>>>and similar elements in "Desert Cathay". They were simply, in the first
>>>millenium BC, a way of expressing quite another kind of home to the
>>>cave's somewhat sophisticated inhabitants
>>>
>>
>>Probably so, but I think the point is that if they could do this in
>>*ninth* millenium BC, it probably points to an even earlier mastery of
>>acrhitectural technology, and even this site is pushing backwards the
>>assumed date and circumstances when this technology was developed.
>>
>
> That was also my obvious point as well, in support of your statement. If
> someone is making a fake beam look like an hellenistically carved beam
> that would normally be in a wooden house, then that person has seen and
> possibly even constructed the wooden house before moving into Mr. cave.
>
>>The fact that people were doing amazing buildings so far back is one
>>thing, but I really find it much more curious that this site was
>>*intentionaly buried*. I'm not sure of the date of covering, but even if
>>animals were domesticated by then, it must have been a huge undertaking,
>>and of great significance. Any bored fool can destroy stuff, but to *bury*
>>it intact must have had meaning that we can only guess at for now.
>>
> When you go in the caves in the volcanic area of Cappadocia in Turkey,
> itentionally buring prevoius parts are a ay of shoring up the tufa.Some of
> the Hittite chambers are incredibly far underground but stairways and etc.
> could undermine chambers built higher with airways.
>
>>Anyway, I'm glad Klaus Schmidt didn't quit school at twelve, and I hope he
>>pieces the whole story together. My habitual structural engineer is a Turk
>>( ..and my kid's best friend is an Shqiptar!
>
> Albanian. Considered pejorative term by anyone other than.
>
>>) and he says that Asia Minor is so littered with ancient sites that they
>>themselves barely knew anything about it when he was coming up in school.
>>He just came back from a business trip to Istanbul and says they're
>>building, with permits, a Four Seasons hotel on a known Roman site in the
>>city. You wonder how much of this stuff will get dozed in the name of
>>progress before they realize what that word means after you all have
>>dishwashers and cars and iPods.
>
> A lot is underground. Cisterns and such. Probably Four Seasons in near
> there and the underground is so vast that it is almost impossible to
> avoid. What is worse in archeology and architetural history is literally
> rasing areas. An incredible lot of Byzantine architecture was rased to
> present a "pristine" Acropolis in Athens I was literally shocked at some
> of the site drawings and photos associated with the archaeology done
> there.

Was the demolition after the advent of photography?



Posted by Kris Krieger on January 28, 2008, 2:27 pm

>
>>
>>
>> Jude Alexander wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks for the link. Seems logical that there were lesser refined
>>>buildings (as these buildings are fairly refined) before people
>>>starting improving on their skills.
>>
>> Or that buildings being in done in quite different materials were
>> being replicated in stone. One example of this is the so-called
>> Hellenistic carvings of furniture and architectural elements like
>> beams in the caves of Bamiyan (probably blown up along with the
>> Buddhas under the Taliban) and similar elements in "Desert Cathay".
>> They were simply, in the first millenium BC, a way of expressing
>> quite another kind of home to the cave's somewhat sophisticated
>> inhabitants
>
> Probably so, but I think the point is that if they could do this in
> *ninth* millenium BC, it probably points to an even earlier mastery of
> acrhitectural technology, and even this site is pushing backwards the
> assumed date and circumstances when this technology was developed.

THat's part of the fascination.

It amazes me that so many "modern" people seem to prefer to believe in BS
about extraterrestrial builders, rather than realize that ancient people
were not only as mentally sophisticated as are people nowadays, but, in
my own theory, in many ways, actually smarter, in that they did not have
all of the "safety nets" that current society provides, andtherfore had
to be, if not more intelligent, then at least more aware and more
sensible.

>
> The fact that people were doing amazing buildings so far back is one
> thing, but I really find it much more curious that this site was
> *intentionaly buried*.

It seems reasonable to suggest, tho', that, having put so much into the
place, and most esp. if it *was* some sort fo sacred place, if the people
did have to move on due to soil depletion, climate change, or some other
problem, the builders chose to cover it rather than leave it open to
erosion and/or "defilement".


> I'm not sure of the date of covering, but even
> if animals were domesticated by then, it must have been a huge
> undertaking, and of great significance. Any bored fool can destroy
> stuff, but to *bury* it intact must have had meaning that we can only
> guess at for now.

I think the various reasons are very understandable. It's natural to
bury, or otherwise hide, something which is of great personal
significance. I think that current thinking is so focused upon the
notion of money=value that many people can't relate to, or even
understand, the concept that value and money are two different things.
Modern people think that money/price creates value, when the reality is
that true value exists independent of money, and money is merely a means
of acquiring or creating that which one values.

Obviously, the people who lived there must have assigned great value to
the place, since they did put so much into erecting the structures, so
IMO, it's perfectly reasonable that, if they did have to leave, they
would prefer to bury it, rather than have it fall into the hands of those
who would deface or even destroy it. If it was a sacred place, than it
also is reasonably to suggest that burying it might also have been a way
of preserving it, preserving the sacredness by preventing it from being
tromped upon/through by people who might defile that sacredness.

>
> Anyway, I'm glad Klaus Schmidt didn't quit school at twelve,

Oh, quit harping on that damn string already, it only makes you appear
petty.

Anyway, the original discussion was, IIRC, mroe about giving kids the
option of going tech-track, entering apprenticeships, as opposed to
*forcing* EVERYONE to follow the exact same educational track, regardless
of their talents or interests.

So give it a rest already and let a decently-interesting thread remain
so, without the puerile sniping.

> and I
> hope he pieces the whole story together. My habitual structural
> engineer is a Turk ( ..and my kid's best friend is an Shqiptar! ) and
> he says that Asia Minor is so littered with ancient sites that they
> themselves barely knew anything about it when he was coming up in
> school.

It'd be so fascinating to go there, except for the fears of violence :(

> He just came back from a business trip to Istanbul and says
> they're building, with permits, a Four Seasons hotel on a known Roman
> site in the city. You wonder how much of this stuff will get dozed in
> the name of progress before they realize what that word means after
> you all have dishwashers and cars and iPods.

The history Channel has presented several interesting shows concerning
the cities that lie beneath modern cities, and one of the most
interesting delved into the ROman and even pre-Roman cities beneath
Istanbul. You might be interested in catching a coupel of those shows -
the chennel does repeat them.





Page 2 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Plaza in Peru may be the America's oldest urban site March 4, 2008, 8:31 am
Hawaiian Modern: The Architecture of Vladimir Ossipoff at Yale Art and Architecture Gallery (Art Daily) September 15, 2008, 1:09 pm
alt. architecture FAQ February 5, 2007, 4:04 pm
Re: alt.architecture March 2, 2007, 12:40 pm
Architecture? July 2, 2007, 1:33 pm
Architecture July 20, 2007, 4:05 pm
About the architecture April 27, 2006, 4:47 am
Architecture Forum February 9, 2007, 8:01 pm
Looking for archimedes architecture May 25, 2007, 6:09 pm
Design, Architecture June 3, 2007, 4:07 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap