Home Page link

The third rail of IQ testing

Architecture and Design - Building design/construction and related topics. 

Page 3 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
The third rail of IQ testing Michael Bulatovich 11-22-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on November 26, 2007, 2:58 pm
A very strange site indeed.

> check it out: http://chnm.gmu.edu/lostmuseum/phrenology/
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>
>>>Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You've met more than one phrenologist?!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Through a relative, yes unfortunately. Accidentally a couple times, too.
>>>Strange bunch.
>>>
>>
>>I once had a guy who claimed he recently had kensho make a comment about
>>the shape of my forehead in the hallway of a Buddhist 'temple', but that's
>>as close as I ever got. I'm not even sure it was based on any theoretical
>>underpinning.



Posted by Kris Krieger on November 27, 2007, 1:51 pm
BTtTanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@rcn.net:

>
>
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Worse than being rejected by a phrenologist is ....
>>>
>>>
>
> A few phrenologists I have met over time have all had in common both an
> inferiority complex and the overwhelming need to feel some sort of both
> superiority and control over other people to compensate for their
> complexes. Can you imagine the creduity of some guy like that
> explaining sotto voce how someone is genetically not quite to the mark
> because of the shape of his oer her head? Now, imagine the irritation
> at being considered one of the phrenologist's presumed illuminati
> because of the shape of your own head. Do you want to be a part of that
> guy's in group?

Given that teh skull takes a couple of years to harden, and that, for
example, ancient Meso-Americans (I think the Maya but check, because I
don't recall) would bind the heads of infants so as to create an elongated
shape, and as a second example, the "papoose", wherein an infant would be
swaddled against a firm back, tended to give the babies' heads a flattened
shape in the back, I do not at all comprehend how anyone can take
phrenology seriously. Maybe, as an infant, someone just slept in a certain
position most of the tiem, as opposed to someone else. It is such a crock
of nonsense that it's not even funny.



>
>>
>>They can *reject* you?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on November 27, 2007, 3:26 pm

> BTtTanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@rcn.net:
>
>>
>>
>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Worse than being rejected by a phrenologist is ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> A few phrenologists I have met over time have all had in common both an
>> inferiority complex and the overwhelming need to feel some sort of both
>> superiority and control over other people to compensate for their
>> complexes. Can you imagine the creduity of some guy like that
>> explaining sotto voce how someone is genetically not quite to the mark
>> because of the shape of his oer her head? Now, imagine the irritation
>> at being considered one of the phrenologist's presumed illuminati
>> because of the shape of your own head. Do you want to be a part of that
>> guy's in group?
>
> Given that teh skull takes a couple of years to harden, and that, for
> example, ancient Meso-Americans (I think the Maya but check, because I
> don't recall) would bind the heads of infants so as to create an elongated

I think you're talking about the "Flatheads":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederated_Salish_and_Kootenai_Tribes_of_the_Flathead_Nation

> shape, and as a second example, the "papoose", wherein an infant would be
> swaddled against a firm back, tended to give the babies' heads a flattened
> shape in the back, I do not at all comprehend how anyone can take
> phrenology seriously. Maybe, as an infant, someone just slept in a
> certain
> position most of the tiem, as opposed to someone else. It is such a crock
> of nonsense that it's not even funny.

Oh, I don't know...being mistaken is one of the mainstays of comedic
structure. As long as no one is about to get hurt by it, it's funny to me,
but then again, so is most religion and the Standard Model. That doesn't
stop most people from taking them very seriously.



Posted by Kris Krieger on November 27, 2007, 4:55 pm

>
>> BTtTanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@rcn.net:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Worse than being rejected by a phrenologist is ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> A few phrenologists I have met over time have all had in common both
>>> an inferiority complex and the overwhelming need to feel some sort
>>> of both superiority and control over other people to compensate for
>>> their complexes. Can you imagine the creduity of some guy like that
>>> explaining sotto voce how someone is genetically not quite to the
>>> mark because of the shape of his oer her head? Now, imagine the
>>> irritation at being considered one of the phrenologist's presumed
>>> illuminati because of the shape of your own head. Do you want to be
>>> a part of that guy's in group?
>>
>> Given that teh skull takes a couple of years to harden, and that, for
>> example, ancient Meso-Americans (I think the Maya but check, because
>> I don't recall) would bind the heads of infants so as to create an
>> elongated
>
> I think you're talking about the "Flatheads":
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederated_Salish_and_Kootenai_Tribes_of
> _the_Flathead_Nation
>
>> shape, and as a second example, the "papoose", wherein an infant
>> would be swaddled against a firm back, tended to give the babies'
>> heads a flattened shape in the back, I do not at all comprehend how
>> anyone can take phrenology seriously. Maybe, as an infant, someone
>> just slept in a certain
>> position most of the tiem, as opposed to someone else. It is such a
>> crock of nonsense that it's not even funny.
>
> Oh, I don't know...being mistaken is one of the mainstays of comedic
> structure. As long as no one is about to get hurt by it, it's funny to
> me, but then again, so is most religion and the Standard Model. That
> doesn't stop most people from taking them very seriously.

Seriously!

((For the r3cord, I do not ahve a flat head. I have a peaked head, nice
pointy ridge on top. I was never any good at eraser tag...))

Posted by Michael Bulatovich on November 27, 2007, 6:02 pm


> ((For the r3cord, I do not ahve a flat head. I have a peaked head, nice
> pointy ridge on top. I was never any good at eraser tag...))

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/2212/coneheads23mz.jpg



Page 3 of 4       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Concrete testing equipment & soil testing equipment January 2, 2008, 10:42 pm
testing new connection... December 16, 2007, 10:13 am
Re: testing new connection... December 16, 2007, 12:01 pm
materials testing equipment January 2, 2008, 10:47 pm
Continuing Education Course Testing Opportunity for Licensed Architects April 27, 2006, 11:49 am
civil engineering testing equipment & lab equipment January 2, 2008, 10:49 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap