Home Page link

A Horrible Mess with a Construction Project - Page 2

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
A Horrible Mess with a Construction Project RF 04-12-2009
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by RicodJour on April 16, 2009, 9:52 am
On Apr 15, 8:36=A0pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
> > Dioclese wrote:
> >>> I bought a 10 acre lot roughly in the mid-west of California in 2001.=
It
> >>> took almost a year to get my first appointment with the planners and =
3
> >>> more years to work the permits through an overloaded and
> >>> not-very-competent (putting it very mildly) county. I finally had all
> >>> the permits and I was about to start construction when I discovered t=
hat
> >>> there was no electric supply at the lot, despite what the realtors ha=
d
> >>> told me and what was on the sales fliers and the underground 3/4" cab=
le
> >>> in a concrete box by the road-side. I tried to settle the situation
> >>> amicably by offering to pay 1/3 the cost of getting the supply to the
> >>> lot. Both realtors refused the suggestion. It was then litigated for
> >>> several years. During that time the county sent me an email indicatin=
g
> >>> that the permits were about to expire but they still could be revived
> >>> several times if they expired. I have that email. I agreed to let the=
m
> >>> expire and when the litigation was complete I contacted the county an=
d
> >>> was told that I would have to start from scratch and pay the fees aga=
in.
> >>> I offered to bring all the documents up to the then-current code but
> >>> they insisted that I had to go through the whole process again. I am
> >>> struggling to find a way out of this mess, since the county has no
> >>> sympathy for my situation. I am trying to get all the documentation u=
p
> >>> to date and then sell the lot with the plans and let the new owner
> >>> handle the permit applications.
> >>> This is where this group may be able to help. I have visited the web
> >>> site:http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
> >>> and it gives lots of details of the changes but most is very irreleva=
nt
> >>> to my needs. Does anyone know of documentation that gives the actual
> >>> down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002. I did all the design
> >>> and drafting for the project. I had the services of a soils engineer,=
a
> >>> septic system designer and a structural engineer. Apart from those I =
did
> >>> almost everything else. I now have all the tracings in TIFF format on=
my
> >>> computer so, no more pencil and drafting board for me.
> >>> Advice will be much appreciated.
> >>> TIA
> >> Since I participated very much in the decision end installation toward=
s
> >> my home (electric/water well/septic system). =A0I understand your dile=
mma.
> >> I do not understand how you did not know that electric supply was not
> >> available on the lot. =A0You seem to be participating from a desk, ins=
tead
> >> of on-site. =A0Since the electricity source is paramount over any othe=
r
> >> support system, and needed in many cases to support those systems, its
> >> priority is primary. =A0I added 1 and 3 and came up with 4 years that =
this
> >> little unknown was not verified in person.
> >> Most realtors have no idea what's on an individual =A0plat of undevelo=
ped
> >> land or lot other than its dimensions and obvious foliage. =A0To have
> >> electricity available for immediate use, a temporary or permanent mete=
r
> >> loop must exist on the property, not roadside. =A0The meter loop allow=
s the
> >> seller of the electricity to monitor use of that, and bill the
> >> appropriate person for that use.
> > First, this is a private area with 10-acre residential lots, and the
> > utilities were supposed to be running along a private road right by the
> > building pad. The water line was already installed at the pad. There wa=
s a
> > concrete box on the roadside with a very heavy lid. I pried it up far
> > enough to see a 3/4" diameter cable lying at the bottom. What would you
> > think it was for? =A0TV, phone, fiber optic, fruit juice? =A0:-)
> > In CA, the regulations do not allow PG&E to make ANY installations unti=
l
> > all permits are approved and construction is ready to start.
> You may be able to BS some of the readers, I know better.

?

> You answered your own question regarding electrical availability in the P=
G&E
> reply. =A0Sad, that means you can't even have a temporary meter loop for =
your
> own use without intentions to build and plans approved for same. =A0Very =
odd
> indeed. =A0Also find it either totally false, or, BS CA way.

The OP didn't have a question about the electric availability. His
question was about updating his drawings to conform to new
requirements. I did find it odd that the OP asked a question and
didn't use a question mark, but it was still clearly the only question
he posted.

> Either way, the PG&E availability after all is approved. =A0Which answers=
your
> orginal question. =A0Why are you here? =A0I have no pity for anyone livin=
g in
> CA, just move, forget the tea party and Hollywood politicians.

Why is the OP here....hmmm, that's a tough one. I'll take a stab at
it. Maybe because he has some questions about how to update his
drawings to conform to the new requirements?

R

Posted by Dioclese on April 17, 2009, 6:54 pm
On Apr 15, 8:36 pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
> > Dioclese wrote:
> >>> I bought a 10 acre lot roughly in the mid-west of California in 2001.
> >>> It
> >>> took almost a year to get my first appointment with the planners and 3
> >>> more years to work the permits through an overloaded and
> >>> not-very-competent (putting it very mildly) county. I finally had all
> >>> the permits and I was about to start construction when I discovered
> >>> that
> >>> there was no electric supply at the lot, despite what the realtors had
> >>> told me and what was on the sales fliers and the underground 3/4"
> >>> cable
> >>> in a concrete box by the road-side. I tried to settle the situation
> >>> amicably by offering to pay 1/3 the cost of getting the supply to the
> >>> lot. Both realtors refused the suggestion. It was then litigated for
> >>> several years. During that time the county sent me an email indicating
> >>> that the permits were about to expire but they still could be revived
> >>> several times if they expired. I have that email. I agreed to let them
> >>> expire and when the litigation was complete I contacted the county and
> >>> was told that I would have to start from scratch and pay the fees
> >>> again.
> >>> I offered to bring all the documents up to the then-current code but
> >>> they insisted that I had to go through the whole process again. I am
> >>> struggling to find a way out of this mess, since the county has no
> >>> sympathy for my situation. I am trying to get all the documentation up
> >>> to date and then sell the lot with the plans and let the new owner
> >>> handle the permit applications.
> >>> This is where this group may be able to help. I have visited the web
> >>> site:http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
> >>> and it gives lots of details of the changes but most is very
> >>> irrelevant
> >>> to my needs. Does anyone know of documentation that gives the actual
> >>> down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002. I did all the design
> >>> and drafting for the project. I had the services of a soils engineer,
> >>> a
> >>> septic system designer and a structural engineer. Apart from those I
> >>> did
> >>> almost everything else. I now have all the tracings in TIFF format on
> >>> my
> >>> computer so, no more pencil and drafting board for me.
> >>> Advice will be much appreciated.
> >>> TIA
> >> Since I participated very much in the decision end installation towards
> >> my home (electric/water well/septic system). I understand your dilemma.
> >> I do not understand how you did not know that electric supply was not
> >> available on the lot. You seem to be participating from a desk, instead
> >> of on-site. Since the electricity source is paramount over any other
> >> support system, and needed in many cases to support those systems, its
> >> priority is primary. I added 1 and 3 and came up with 4 years that this
> >> little unknown was not verified in person.
> >> Most realtors have no idea what's on an individual plat of undeveloped
> >> land or lot other than its dimensions and obvious foliage. To have
> >> electricity available for immediate use, a temporary or permanent meter
> >> loop must exist on the property, not roadside. The meter loop allows
> >> the
> >> seller of the electricity to monitor use of that, and bill the
> >> appropriate person for that use.
> > First, this is a private area with 10-acre residential lots, and the
> > utilities were supposed to be running along a private road right by the
> > building pad. The water line was already installed at the pad. There was
> > a
> > concrete box on the roadside with a very heavy lid. I pried it up far
> > enough to see a 3/4" diameter cable lying at the bottom. What would you
> > think it was for? TV, phone, fiber optic, fruit juice? :-)
> > In CA, the regulations do not allow PG&E to make ANY installations until
> > all permits are approved and construction is ready to start.
> You may be able to BS some of the readers, I know better.

?

> You answered your own question regarding electrical availability in the
> PG&E
> reply. Sad, that means you can't even have a temporary meter loop for your
> own use without intentions to build and plans approved for same. Very odd
> indeed. Also find it either totally false, or, BS CA way.

The OP didn't have a question about the electric availability. His
question was about updating his drawings to conform to new
requirements. I did find it odd that the OP asked a question and
didn't use a question mark, but it was still clearly the only question
he posted.


No, go back and read the original again.

> Either way, the PG&E availability after all is approved. Which answers
> your
> orginal question. Why are you here? I have no pity for anyone living in
> CA, just move, forget the tea party and Hollywood politicians.

Why is the OP here....hmmm, that's a tough one. I'll take a stab at
it. Maybe because he has some questions about how to update his
drawings to conform to the new requirements?

R
-----
Still don't see that anywhere. Maybe you can point that question out
someplace in the thread?



Posted by RicodJour on April 17, 2009, 7:44 pm
On Apr 17, 6:54=A0pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 8:36 pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
> > > Dioclese wrote:
> > >>> I bought a 10 acre lot roughly in the mid-west of California in 200=
1.
> > >>> It
> > >>> took almost a year to get my first appointment with the planners an=
d 3
> > >>> more years to work the permits through an overloaded and
> > >>> not-very-competent (putting it very mildly) county. I finally had a=
ll
> > >>> the permits and I was about to start construction when I discovered
> > >>> that
> > >>> there was no electric supply at the lot, despite what the realtors =
had
> > >>> told me and what was on the sales fliers and the underground 3/4"
> > >>> cable
> > >>> in a concrete box by the road-side. I tried to settle the situation
> > >>> amicably by offering to pay 1/3 the cost of getting the supply to t=
he
> > >>> lot. Both realtors refused the suggestion. It was then litigated fo=
r
> > >>> several years. During that time the county sent me an email indicat=
ing
> > >>> that the permits were about to expire but they still could be reviv=
ed
> > >>> several times if they expired. I have that email. I agreed to let t=
hem
> > >>> expire and when the litigation was complete I contacted the county =
and
> > >>> was told that I would have to start from scratch and pay the fees
> > >>> again.
> > >>> I offered to bring all the documents up to the then-current code bu=
t
> > >>> they insisted that I had to go through the whole process again. I a=
m
> > >>> struggling to find a way out of this mess, since the county has no
> > >>> sympathy for my situation. I am trying to get all the documentation=
up
> > >>> to date and then sell the lot with the plans and let the new owner
> > >>> handle the permit applications.
> > >>> This is where this group may be able to help. I have visited the we=
b
> > >>> site:http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
> > >>> and it gives lots of details of the changes but most is very
> > >>> irrelevant
> > >>> to my needs. Does anyone know of documentation that gives the actua=
l
> > >>> down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002. I did all the desi=
gn
> > >>> and drafting for the project. I had the services of a soils enginee=
r,
> > >>> a
> > >>> septic system designer and a structural engineer. Apart from those =
I
> > >>> did
> > >>> almost everything else. I now have all the tracings in TIFF format =
on
> > >>> my
> > >>> computer so, no more pencil and drafting board for me.
> > >>> Advice will be much appreciated.
> > >>> TIA
> > >> Since I participated very much in the decision end installation towa=
rds
> > >> my home (electric/water well/septic system). I understand your dilem=
ma.
> > >> I do not understand how you did not know that electric supply was no=
t
> > >> available on the lot. You seem to be participating from a desk, inst=
ead
> > >> of on-site. Since the electricity source is paramount over any other
> > >> support system, and needed in many cases to support those systems, i=
ts
> > >> priority is primary. I added 1 and 3 and came up with 4 years that t=
his
> > >> little unknown was not verified in person.
> > >> Most realtors have no idea what's on an individual plat of undevelop=
ed
> > >> land or lot other than its dimensions and obvious foliage. To have
> > >> electricity available for immediate use, a temporary or permanent me=
ter
> > >> loop must exist on the property, not roadside. The meter loop allows
> > >> the
> > >> seller of the electricity to monitor use of that, and bill the
> > >> appropriate person for that use.
> > > First, this is a private area with 10-acre residential lots, and the
> > > utilities were supposed to be running along a private road right by t=
he
> > > building pad. The water line was already installed at the pad. There =
was
> > > a
> > > concrete box on the roadside with a very heavy lid. I pried it up far
> > > enough to see a 3/4" diameter cable lying at the bottom. What would y=
ou
> > > think it was for? TV, phone, fiber optic, fruit juice? :-)
> > > In CA, the regulations do not allow PG&E to make ANY installations un=
til
> > > all permits are approved and construction is ready to start.
> > You may be able to BS some of the readers, I know better.
> ?
> > You answered your own question regarding electrical availability in the
> > PG&E
> > reply. Sad, that means you can't even have a temporary meter loop for y=
our
> > own use without intentions to build and plans approved for same. Very o=
dd
> > indeed. Also find it either totally false, or, BS CA way.
> The OP didn't have a question about the electric availability. =A0His
> question was about updating his drawings to conform to new
> requirements. =A0I did find it odd that the OP asked a question and
> didn't use a question mark, but it was still clearly the only question
> he posted.
> No, go back and read the original again.

I did. Same result. He only asked the one question (sans "?" (see
below (or above))). His second post addressed your questions and
slights. Then you told him he was BSing.

> > Either way, the PG&E availability after all is approved. Which answers
> > your
> > orginal question. Why are you here? I have no pity for anyone living in
> > CA, just move, forget the tea party and Hollywood politicians.
> Why is the OP here....hmmm, that's a tough one. =A0I'll take a stab at
> it. =A0Maybe because he has some questions about how to update his
> drawings to conform to the new requirements?
> R
> -----
> Still don't see that anywhere. =A0 Maybe you can point that question out
> someplace in the thread?

Okey dokey. Here you go:
"This is where this group may be able to help. I
have visited the web site:
http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
and it gives lots of details of the changes but
most is very irrelevant to my needs. Does anyone
know of documentation that gives the actual
down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002."

See? He left out the question mark after 2002...maybe there's a
shortage where he is.

In any event you're dragging the thread off topic, beat up on somebody
that you don't know, apparently because you know his situation better
than he does.

At least that's the view from the cheap seats. So, if it's not that -
what are you trying to do? Vent?

R

Posted by RF on April 17, 2009, 10:10 pm
RicodJour wrote:
> On Apr 17, 6:54 pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 8:36 pm, "Dioclese" <NONE> wrote:
>>>> Dioclese wrote:
>>>>>> I bought a 10 acre lot roughly in the mid-west of California in 2001.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> took almost a year to get my first appointment with the planners and 3
>>>>>> more years to work the permits through an overloaded and
>>>>>> not-very-competent (putting it very mildly) county. I finally had all
>>>>>> the permits and I was about to start construction when I discovered
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> there was no electric supply at the lot, despite what the realtors had
>>>>>> told me and what was on the sales fliers and the underground 3/4"
>>>>>> cable
>>>>>> in a concrete box by the road-side. I tried to settle the situation
>>>>>> amicably by offering to pay 1/3 the cost of getting the supply to the
>>>>>> lot. Both realtors refused the suggestion. It was then litigated for
>>>>>> several years. During that time the county sent me an email indicating
>>>>>> that the permits were about to expire but they still could be revived
>>>>>> several times if they expired. I have that email. I agreed to let them
>>>>>> expire and when the litigation was complete I contacted the county and
>>>>>> was told that I would have to start from scratch and pay the fees
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>> I offered to bring all the documents up to the then-current code but
>>>>>> they insisted that I had to go through the whole process again. I am
>>>>>> struggling to find a way out of this mess, since the county has no
>>>>>> sympathy for my situation. I am trying to get all the documentation up
>>>>>> to date and then sell the lot with the plans and let the new owner
>>>>>> handle the permit applications.
>>>>>> This is where this group may be able to help. I have visited the web
>>>>>> site:http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
>>>>>> and it gives lots of details of the changes but most is very
>>>>>> irrelevant
>>>>>> to my needs. Does anyone know of documentation that gives the actual
>>>>>> down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002. I did all the design
>>>>>> and drafting for the project. I had the services of a soils engineer,
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> septic system designer and a structural engineer. Apart from those I
>>>>>> did
>>>>>> almost everything else. I now have all the tracings in TIFF format on
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> computer so, no more pencil and drafting board for me.
>>>>>> Advice will be much appreciated.
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>> Since I participated very much in the decision end installation towards
>>>>> my home (electric/water well/septic system). I understand your dilemma.
>>>>> I do not understand how you did not know that electric supply was not
>>>>> available on the lot. You seem to be participating from a desk, instead
>>>>> of on-site. Since the electricity source is paramount over any other
>>>>> support system, and needed in many cases to support those systems, its
>>>>> priority is primary. I added 1 and 3 and came up with 4 years that this
>>>>> little unknown was not verified in person.
>>>>> Most realtors have no idea what's on an individual plat of undeveloped
>>>>> land or lot other than its dimensions and obvious foliage. To have
>>>>> electricity available for immediate use, a temporary or permanent meter
>>>>> loop must exist on the property, not roadside. The meter loop allows
>>>>> the
>>>>> seller of the electricity to monitor use of that, and bill the
>>>>> appropriate person for that use.
>>>> First, this is a private area with 10-acre residential lots, and the
>>>> utilities were supposed to be running along a private road right by the
>>>> building pad. The water line was already installed at the pad. There was
>>>> a
>>>> concrete box on the roadside with a very heavy lid. I pried it up far
>>>> enough to see a 3/4" diameter cable lying at the bottom. What would you
>>>> think it was for? TV, phone, fiber optic, fruit juice? :-)
>>>> In CA, the regulations do not allow PG&E to make ANY installations until
>>>> all permits are approved and construction is ready to start.
>>> You may be able to BS some of the readers, I know better.
>> ?
>>> You answered your own question regarding electrical availability in the
>>> PG&E
>>> reply. Sad, that means you can't even have a temporary meter loop for your
>>> own use without intentions to build and plans approved for same. Very odd
>>> indeed. Also find it either totally false, or, BS CA way.
>> The OP didn't have a question about the electric availability. His
>> question was about updating his drawings to conform to new
>> requirements. I did find it odd that the OP asked a question and
>> didn't use a question mark, but it was still clearly the only question
>> he posted.
>> No, go back and read the original again.
>
> I did. Same result. He only asked the one question (sans "?" (see
> below (or above))). His second post addressed your questions and
> slights. Then you told him he was BSing.
>
>>> Either way, the PG&E availability after all is approved. Which answers
>>> your
>>> orginal question. Why are you here? I have no pity for anyone living in
>>> CA, just move, forget the tea party and Hollywood politicians.
>> Why is the OP here....hmmm, that's a tough one. I'll take a stab at
>> it. Maybe because he has some questions about how to update his
>> drawings to conform to the new requirements?
>> R
>> -----
>> Still don't see that anywhere. Maybe you can point that question out
>> someplace in the thread?
>
> Okey dokey. Here you go:
> "This is where this group may be able to help. I
> have visited the web site:
> http://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/Code/default.htm
> and it gives lots of details of the changes but
> most is very irrelevant to my needs. Does anyone
> know of documentation that gives the actual
> down-to-earth changes in the process since 2002."
>
> See? He left out the question mark after 2002...maybe there's a
> shortage where he is.
>
> In any event you're dragging the thread off topic, beat up on somebody
> that you don't know, apparently because you know his situation better
> than he does.
>
> At least that's the view from the cheap seats. So, if it's not that -
> what are you trying to do? Vent?
>
> R

Thaaaaank you Rico. I owe you a beer at least :-)

As is well known, building regulations change on a
regular basis.
The new regulations are spewed out sporadically,
but I was not able to find any documentation on
the actual changes from the regulation I used in
the original design - in 2001 to 2003. That
information would make my present task much
easier. It would be very laborious to have to go
back over the old regulations [planning, grading,
energy, plumbing, electrical, .... ] and then read
the present ones to find the modifications that I
would need to make.

My guess is that the state and county bureaucrats
have no interest in making a list of the practical
changes so I am hoping that someone knows, or that
I can find a book on the changes.

Thanks again for the support. Please tell the
other guy to hitch a ride home ;-)
Have a great weekend!

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2
Similar ThreadsPosted
Earth Home Construction Project July 17, 2007, 1:19 pm
spectacular, successful, ongoing building construction project May 16, 2007, 9:41 pm
Soth Korean Company Awarded Construction Project in Kuwait March 28, 2007, 7:21 am
Brick Column project - What do you think July 13, 2006, 8:55 pm
need help with retaining wall project!! September 19, 2006, 7:18 pm
Project Management Courses November 22, 2006, 1:15 am
Project Management Tools November 30, 2006, 4:23 pm
Estimation and Project Management Software July 12, 2007, 3:34 am
Innovative materials - school project June 24, 2007, 12:56 pm
Wanted:The Project Resources Manual August 11, 2007, 6:39 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap