|
Posted by DT on October 3, 2006, 9:29 am
public@towner.org.uk says...
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a block-built outbuilding, 3m x 5.5m, which has a flat roof with
>a 5 degree slope running down its length. The current roof is
>corrugated asbestos cement, supported on joists running across the
>shorter span, at about 1m centres. The joists are embedded in narrow
>slots in the inner face of the wall.
>
>I want to replace the roof with a solid roof. Everything I've read so
>far details the construction of such a roof based upon the joists
>running down the length of the slope, rather than across the slope. Now
>for my building, having the joists running that way would mean I need
>5.5m lengths of 3"x9". If I ran the joists the other way (as they are
>currently) I could use smaller joists (2"x6"), or greater centres,
>either of which makes the whole construction cheaper.
>
>The difficulty I see with running the joists across the slope, rather
>than down its length, is securing them. I can't reuse the existing
>joist slots - they are too narrow, and widely spaced. Instead, I would
>have to position the joist on top of the walls (actually quite
>desirable, since this gives me more headroom inside the building). If I
>attached the joists directly to the top of the wall, then they would be
>off vertical by 5 degrees, so I would have to position blocks of timber
>to fit into the gaps between the joists to provide sideways support.
>Alternatively, I could run a timber bar along the top of the wall, and
>then cut vertical notches in that timber to support the joists in an
>upright position. I would then have to cut the top off each joist, to
>provide a 5 degree slope to which I could attach the plyboard deck.
>
>Is building a roof with the joists running across the slope feasible,
>or should I conform to the practice of running the joists down the
>length of the slope?
>
>thanks,
>
>dan.
>
|