|
Posted by Ramin.Sh1 on January 18, 2007, 6:09 am
Dan Deckert =E4=E6=D4=CA=E5 =C7=D3=CA:
> Ramin,
> Albeit I've stayed away from this thread, I just can't take anymore of yo=
ur impertanance. As Bob states;
>
> I very much doubt that you will find a 10,000-20,000 cubic meter tank
> constructed in this fashion.
>
> Gotta agree there...........................
>
>
> You asked for the fastest method. One of the fastest (as mentioned by
> others) is to dig a hole and line it with with Hypalon or similar product.
> This is a common, fast and inexpensive method to build large volume water
> storage. You immediately rejected this advice because it didn't give the
> answer you wanted based on some criteria unknown to us.
>
> Gotta agree there as well..........................
>
> If the solution must be a tank, then there is only steel or concrete.
> Neither method will be "fast". As I said earlier, a project of this size
> will take a least a year to construct. Just the infrastructure to fill
> and drain the tank is a major undertaking.
>
> Well Bob fell (sorta) on his butt here, "If the solution must be a tank,"=
because the only obvious solution is a tank. I suppose you could round up =
a couple of million 1 gallon jugs & plumb them......har~har.....However, Bo=
bs statement of, "a project of this size will take a least a year to constr=
uct. Just the infrastructure to fill and drain the tank is a major underta=
king." is a fairly qualified statement.
>
> It would seem you're taking an adversarial attitude in this matter instea=
d of SERIOUSLY LOOKING at the advice given here. Unless you believe Captain=
Kirk & Scotty are going to beam down here and make you some transparent al=
uminum panels that can hold whales like in the movies.
>
> I know of a few people/companies that would be more then willing to build=
a tank this size out of steel. Prices start @ $200.00/hr per man/hr plus a=
ll expenses. Satisfaction guaranteed............... In essence get a damn h=
int here and quit bitchin. Ie: Either shit or get off the Pot!
>
> Dan
>
Without considering your language, that is an answer. I'd be glad if I
could find some of those companies...
|