|
Posted by Bud-- on July 7, 2006, 4:45 pm
w_tom wrote:
> Bud-- wrote:
>
>>Never seen: any link from w_tom that says plug-in surge suppressors are
>>not effective.
>
> He has seen plug-in protectors defined as ineffective for reason
> after reason. For example, Bud pretends these pictures don't exist:
For what "definintion"; what "reason after reason"?
People working in surge protection are aware that UL revised 1449 to
include protection for overheating MOVs. Maybe you should keep up. Were
all these surge suppressors even listed under the original UL 1449?
The IEEE and NIST say plug-in surge suppressors are effective.
I have still not seen a link from you that said plug-in surge
suppressors are not effective.
bud--
|