If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by hallerb@aol.com on January 14, 2009, 6:02 pm
> ...
> > If he does send me a bill, what do I do? =EF=BF=BDDo I just pay it with=
out
> > question? =EF=BF=BDPay it and give him the bill for the other repair wo=
rk
> > necessitated by the leak? =EF=BF=BD...
> If you didn't discuss it at the time (of the repair), you pay the bill
> and go on.
> Since it was his work, he may have realized he did have a cold solder
> joint and not bill it but I'd not count on it after four years nor
> would I expect him to negate the bill once sent if it wasn't discussed
> at the time of the repair as noted.
> As for the access work repair cost, I'd not expect him to bear any of
> that cost at this time.
> --
yeah 4 YEARS is a long time, if he doesnt bill you send more business
his way!
Around here plumbers present bill at completion of job.
so you may have gotten a free pass.
|
|
Posted by on January 14, 2009, 10:41 pm
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:28:34 -0800 (PST), Handplanes
(snip for brevity:)
>That's the background, now here's my question.
>Is there an implied warranty of some sort that covers concealed work
>and problems that don't immediately show up? I know new houses have
>warranties, and that a standard contract usually has a one year
>warranty covering the work, but this is an older house, and there
>wasn't a contract. In any event I don't think an entirely new
>bathroom plumbing system should leak from the supply lines in just a
>few years.
I'm a renovations contractor in Alberta, Canada.
Our renovations are done under written contract with a warranty of one
year on work done and material provided. That's fairly standard
here.
Obviously if a client has a problem, I'm not going to be a stickler
for the the one year limitation ... I'll use my best judgement, and
I will err on the customers" side. It's just good business ... I
tell my trades that when the contract is signed, I have made my
profit ... what we are working for is the repeat and the referral.
Most serious contractors do the same. It's the cheapest advertising
we can buy.
A verbal agreement is a contract ... you should have asked at the time
the work was done ...even had him scrawl a guarantee on the bill.
Similarly, when he did the repair, you should have asked whether he
was doing it at his own expense or whether he intended to bill you and
if so, how much.
The only legal maxim I'm aware of that you can rely on is that you
have a right to a "reasonable expectation the work and materials are
suitable for the use intended".
You should know that soldered joints will occasionally let go. There
could have been the tiniest, tiniest pinhole crack weakening the
soldered joint that four years of pressure finally worked through.
No way he could have known or caught it when it happened.
Four years is a long time .... I'd say it's a "goodwill issue". If
you're a good customer or if he's a good guy, you'll be treated
fairly. Your description sounds like a couple of hours maximum.
In future, nail down the cost and the warranty in advance.
Ken
|
|
Posted by Don & Lucille on January 15, 2009, 4:47 am
It good have been a faulty fitting. I've experienced this at work plumb the
job turn on the water only to find a pinhole in a brand new fitting!!@
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:28:34 -0800 (PST), Handplanes
> (snip for brevity:)
>>That's the background, now here's my question.
>>Is there an implied warranty of some sort that covers concealed work
>>and problems that don't immediately show up? I know new houses have
>>warranties, and that a standard contract usually has a one year
>>warranty covering the work, but this is an older house, and there
>>wasn't a contract. In any event I don't think an entirely new
>>bathroom plumbing system should leak from the supply lines in just a
>>few years.
> I'm a renovations contractor in Alberta, Canada.
> Our renovations are done under written contract with a warranty of one
> year on work done and material provided. That's fairly standard
> here.
> Obviously if a client has a problem, I'm not going to be a stickler
> for the the one year limitation ... I'll use my best judgement, and
> I will err on the customers" side. It's just good business ... I
> tell my trades that when the contract is signed, I have made my
> profit ... what we are working for is the repeat and the referral.
> Most serious contractors do the same. It's the cheapest advertising
> we can buy.
> A verbal agreement is a contract ... you should have asked at the time
> the work was done ...even had him scrawl a guarantee on the bill.
> Similarly, when he did the repair, you should have asked whether he
> was doing it at his own expense or whether he intended to bill you and
> if so, how much.
> The only legal maxim I'm aware of that you can rely on is that you
> have a right to a "reasonable expectation the work and materials are
> suitable for the use intended".
> You should know that soldered joints will occasionally let go. There
> could have been the tiniest, tiniest pinhole crack weakening the
> soldered joint that four years of pressure finally worked through.
> No way he could have known or caught it when it happened.
> Four years is a long time .... I'd say it's a "goodwill issue". If
> you're a good customer or if he's a good guy, you'll be treated
> fairly. Your description sounds like a couple of hours maximum.
> In future, nail down the cost and the warranty in advance.
> Ken
>
|
|
Posted by on January 15, 2009, 9:07 am
On Jan 14, 10:41=A0pm, bam...@nospam.tnx wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:28:34 -0800 (PST), Handplanes
> (snip for brevity:)
> >That's the background, now here's my question.
> >Is there an implied warranty of some sort that covers concealed work
> >and problems that don't immediately show up? =A0I know new houses have
> >warranties, and that a standard contract usually has a one year
> >warranty covering the work, but this is an older house, and there
> >wasn't a contract. =A0In any event I don't think an entirely new
> >bathroom plumbing system should leak from the supply lines in just a
> >few years.
> I'm a renovations contractor in Alberta, Canada. =A0
> Our renovations are done under written contract with a warranty of one
> year on work done and material provided. =A0 =A0 That's fairly standard
> here. =A0
> Obviously if a client has a problem, =A0I'm not going to be a stickler
> for the the one year limitation ... =A0 I'll use my best judgement, and
> I will err on the customers" side. =A0 =A0It's just good business ... I
> tell my trades that when the contract is signed, =A0I have made my
> profit ... what we are working for is the repeat and the referral.
> Most serious contractors do the same. =A0It's the cheapest advertising
> we can buy.
> A verbal agreement is a contract ... you should have asked at the time
> the work was done ...even had him scrawl =A0a guarantee on the bill. =A0 =
=A0
> Similarly, =A0when he did the repair, =A0you should have asked whether he
> was doing it at his own expense or whether he intended to bill you and
> if so, how much. =A0 =A0
> The only legal maxim I'm aware of that you can rely on is that you
> have a right to a "reasonable expectation the work and materials are
> suitable for the use intended".
> You should know that soldered joints will occasionally let go. =A0There
> could have been the tiniest, tiniest pinhole crack weakening =A0the
> soldered joint that four years of pressure finally =A0worked through.
> No way he could have known or caught it when it happened.
> Four years is a long time =A0.... =A0I'd say it's a "goodwill issue". =A0=
If
> you're a good customer or if he's a good guy, =A0you'll be treated
> fairly. =A0 =A0 Your description sounds like a couple of hours maximum.
> In future, =A0nail down the cost and the warranty in advance. =A0
> Ken =A0
Agree with all of the above, including that there was in fact a
contract for the original work. It was a verbal one, though, which of
course presents many problems.
If it had failed in a couple months, I think the situation would be
different. But after 4 years, I doubt you could prevail from a legal
standpoint. Also, as someone pointed out, it could have been a
defect in the materials. The plumber provided them, but is he then
responsible 4 years later for a possible manufacturing defect?
|
|
Posted by jamesgangnc on January 15, 2009, 7:58 am
I would not expect it to be covered.
> Hi. I very recently noticed some mold in the den under the master
> bathroom. The mold was up by the ceiling where it meets the wall -
> tthe tub is above that so I knew it wasn't good. The bathroom above
> was remodeled about four years ago and all of the plumbing was
> replaced.
> I opened up the ceiling and the sheetrock was wet and moldy, so I cut
> it out, cleaned up the mold as best I could, located what was leaking
> and called the plumber.
> There was a copper T in the riser supplying the sink branch. The T
> was leaking where the horizontal line came in. I don't know how long
> the leak had been dripping, but for the amount of green crud on the
> outside of the T it must have been for a while. You could see that
> the solder at the T was rough and not smooth like it usually is when
> the solder and fitting are hot enough.
> The plumber came out and took a look and agreed that it was the T that
> leaked and there was no other damage that caused the leak. When the
> remodeling work was done I did not have a contract with the plumber,
> it was a verbal agreement (I know that's not recommended!) and
> everything went fine.
> That's the background, now here's my question.
> Is there an implied warranty of some sort that covers concealed work
> and problems that don't immediately show up? I know new houses have
> warranties, and that a standard contract usually has a one year
> warranty covering the work, but this is an older house, and there
> wasn't a contract. In any event I don't think an entirely new
> bathroom plumbing system should leak from the supply lines in just a
> few years.
> So, who's responsible for the repair costs? I'm not particularly
> concerned about the sheetrock, painting and the few tiles I had to
> remove at the tub to access the plumbing. It's more of a question of
> whether the plumber should take care of the plumbing repair on his
> dime as it was his work that caused the problem.
> It was due to an honest mistake - his mistake - and I know he is a
> good plumber. I thought that he would take care of the repair since
> his work caused the problem and I would not be billed. In return I
> would not bill him for the damaged sheetrock, painting and tile that
> had to be removed as I have a relative that does general construction
> and handyman work for me. In mentioning the situation to some friends
> they said that the plumber would probably hit me with a hefty bill for
> the plumbing repair.
> If he does send me a bill, what do I do? Do I just pay it without
> question? Pay it and give him the bill for the other repair work
> necessitated by the leak? I really have no idea what legal area this
> would fall under and whether there is some standard procedure for a
> concealed problem showing up a few years down the road.
> I have no intention of taking this to a lawyer or small claims court,
> and I live in NY if anyone knows the specifics in my state. I am just
> curious what people's opinions are on this type of thing and if
> someone could provide some guidance on how to approach the topic with
> the plumber if he does in fact send me a bill.
> Any and all replies will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
> Nick
|
Page 2 of 5 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | responsibility | May 24, 2009, 3:48 pm |
| CyberShow - Middle East Construction Show | October 25, 2006, 10:03 pm |
| Middle East Construction Show - CyberShow II | October 28, 2006, 12:37 am |
| CyberShow - Middle East Construction Show | November 18, 2006, 2:14 am |
| Middle East Recycling Technologies show | May 28, 2007, 2:26 am |
| Internet Radio Home Repair Show | November 8, 2007, 3:04 pm |
| RecShow - Middle East Online Recycling Show | February 15, 2007, 11:23 am |
| Question: | October 7, 2006, 2:31 pm |
| MDO question | February 12, 2009, 11:25 am |
| Flashing Question | July 7, 2006, 2:56 am |
|
|