If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by ransley on October 4, 2009, 10:19 am
> For security purposes, I need to select a good , reliable, =A0Wireless
> Infrared Camera. =A0It needs to work well in the daytime, and decently at
> night. =A0It can only be wireless, and should send a signal consistently,
> about 200 feet.
> I have not decided if I want one that will work with a regular tv monitor=
,
> or if I want it to be used in conjunction with my pc. =A0It would me nice=
if I
> had one that could do both, so that I could monitor at my pc, and have a
> regular tv act as an auxliary monitor in another room.
> Is there a unit that allows for all of this use ? =A0 =A0I know there is =
a lot
> out there, and when I googled for info, =A0I just get overwhelmed. =A0 I =
thought
> that maybe some of you have used these type of cameras and could offer me
> some advice.
> Thank you very much for any advice !!
> James
www.supercircuts.com they have most everything, 200 ft needs better
equipment than local stores carry.
|
|
Posted by James on October 4, 2009, 10:23 am
Thanks ransley !! I will study the info at that link. I am still
hoping that someone can tell me about a specific camera that they have used
with good results.
Thanks again
James
|
|
Posted by PeterD on October 4, 2009, 11:23 am
wrote:
>Thanks ransley !! I will study the info at that link. I am still
>hoping that someone can tell me about a specific camera that they have used
>with good results.
Read my other response. I tried some wireless products, and realized
that running cables was the only reliable way to go.
I also forgot to mention that virtually all low end wireless
components are not secure, and can be monitored by the 'bad guys'
easily. I have a basic wireless receiver in my truck, and when I drive
around, I'm amazed at what I see--peoples homes, bedrooms, (no baths,
yet, fortunately) and back rooms for business. Instead of providing
security, these setups are actually weakening it! (Especially home
systems whcih are not usually recorded!)
>Thanks again
>James
|
|
Posted by James on October 4, 2009, 11:33 am
Very, very helpful comments, Peter ! I will study this.
As far as 3rd parties monitoring my camera, that is not a problem. This is
a vacation cabin, several miles from any neighbor, and virtually no
traffic.
I may ask you further questions later on, if you don't mind Peter.
James
|
|
Posted by PeterD on October 4, 2009, 5:29 pm
wrote:
>Very, very helpful comments, Peter ! I will study this.
>As far as 3rd parties monitoring my camera, that is not a problem. This is
>a vacation cabin, several miles from any neighbor, and virtually no
>traffic.
>I may ask you further questions later on, if you don't mind Peter.
>James
No problem...
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Good Choice of Table Saw for very casual home use ?? | February 7, 2009, 9:40 pm |
| Infrared Thermometers | December 28, 2007, 9:46 am |
| Infrared Thermometer for finding energy leaks | October 23, 2007, 8:22 pm |
| Question about checking wall cavities (with digital camera?) | January 1, 2008, 4:33 pm |
| choice of elevator | June 2, 2008, 6:53 pm |
| Good Stuff Pro | November 3, 2006, 8:16 am |
| Identifying good developers and bad ones | July 26, 2006, 3:27 pm |
| A good building book! | November 19, 2006, 2:32 am |
| How good is Tech Shield? | February 11, 2007, 10:24 pm |
| Looking for a good way to soundproof my windows | April 11, 2007, 5:35 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> Infrared Camera. =A0It needs to work well in the daytime, and decently at
> night. =A0It can only be wireless, and should send a signal consistently,
> about 200 feet.
> I have not decided if I want one that will work with a regular tv monitor=