|
Posted by PeterD on March 11, 2008, 9:49 am
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:30:25 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour
>> As a Quality Team member from a modular home manufacturer, I fully
>> understand the many complex issues surrounding the entire process. I
>> would suggest that you visit the site
:http://www.modulartoday.com/modular-directory.html
>> , which will let you rate and review the manufacturer of your home. As
>> for the warraranties, there are pros and cons. I am aware of the 2-10
>> warranty which is fairly standard in the business, and I know that it
>> is an optional warranty, which means you agreed to the terms of it
>> before choosing it over the 'standard' warranty. The 2-10 generally
>> limits claims to 'factory defects' and does not include service issues
>> or installation issues not performed at the factory, or by factory
>> personnel. Many builders supply thier own subcontractors for final
>> hookups. These are not covered under the 2-10, but may be covered
>> under the builders warranty. Unfortunately, many builders don't stick
>> around to honor those claims, and the factory is left with a
>> disgruntled customer and no middleman. These cases never end on a
>> positive note. Anyway, just my take on the issue, hope it helps some.
>
>That sounds like a built-in problem with the warranty. Do you see any
>way around it, or at least a way to minimize the problem? You could
>give a quick comparison of the standard warranty versus the 2-10 and
>explain why someone would choose one warranty over the other. Thanks.
>
>R
I'm not sure that this will help, but another way of looking at what
hogheavenfarm said is:
A car dealer buys cars from the maker.
The car dealer adds an optioal item (say window tint) to the car.
The car dealer sells the car with the now tinted windows.
The tinting fails (say it was improperly installed, or not a good
product, that doesn't matter)
The dealer goes away (say they go out of business)
Would the maker warranty the tinting? Generally, no.
The problem is that the party who did the 'installation' of the
modular home was at fault probably and not necessarily the maker of
the original structure.
|