Home Page link

Re: Safety First - Call a Professional

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Safety First - Call a Professional Esther & Fester Bestertester 12-15-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 17, 2006, 11:49 am

> Dear Mr. Michael Bulatovich
>
> The advice you have just given is faulty. So far no one has been sued
> for providing faulty advice on this newsgroup. However, since you
> have lied to us about this matter, I have no choice but to sue you for
> providing faulty, misleading and dishonest information on a public
> forum. Therefore, I am charging you under the US Federal penal code
> item #204-990-5213.01. You will be served your legal lawsuit
> paperwork within the next week, to be hand delivered by your local
> police department. I suggest you contact your attorney immediately
> because this is going to be an ugly battle and I ALWAYS win every
> case. If you so choose, you can pay the sum of $50,000,000.00 in US
> currency, and I will drop this case. This information, including the
> address of my office, to which you must send you payment, will be
> noted on this legal document.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Atty. Jeffery D. Formann
> Federal Attorney at Law, U.S. Courts
>
> --------------- E N D O F N O T I C E ------------

Ya won't get me, copper!



Posted by Bob Morrison on December 15, 2006, 4:24 pm


wrote:
> Thus spake safety...@everywhere.com:
>
> > It seems that in 90% of all posts on this newsgroup. someone tells the poster
> > to contact the pros. Well, I fully agree.Y'think that some of those posters
are professionals that
> see USENET as a threat to their livelihood? And if we
> simply share information on how to do something safely,
> s/he thinks that they will end up in the poor house?
>

I don't need any more work, I have plenty thank you.

Those of us who are professionals often recommend contacting a pro
because we know all too well the consequences of not doing so. If you
want to risk your own life or safety that's up to you. To put your
family or members of the public at risk because you are too cheap to do
the job properly is a whole 'nother story. In my mind that's grounds
for criminal negligence (at least) if not more serious charges.
> FBt


Posted by tbasc@bellsouth.net on December 15, 2006, 7:47 pm

Bob Morrison wrote:
> wrote:
> > Thus spake safety...@everywhere.com:
> >
> > > It seems that in 90% of all posts on this newsgroup. someone tells the
poster
> > > to contact the pros. Well, I fully agree.Y'think that some of those
posters are professionals that
> > see USENET as a threat to their livelihood? And if we
> > simply share information on how to do something safely,
> > s/he thinks that they will end up in the poor house?
> >
>
> I don't need any more work, I have plenty thank you.
>
> Those of us who are professionals often recommend contacting a pro
> because we know all too well the consequences of not doing so. If you
> want to risk your own life or safety that's up to you. To put your
> family or members of the public at risk because you are too cheap to do
> the job properly is a whole 'nother story. In my mind that's grounds
> for criminal negligence (at least) if not more serious charges.
> > FBt

In addition, some / many of the descriptions are incomplete or confused
and a competent professional like Bob, Rico and others would reasonably
want a knowledgable person to look at the problem and describe it
before profering a suggestion.
TB


Posted by Michael Bulatovich on December 15, 2006, 9:37 pm

> some / many of the descriptions are incomplete or confused

You noticed that too, eh?
--


MichaelB
www.michaelbulatovich.ca



Posted by RicodJour on December 15, 2006, 11:26 pm
tbasc@bellsouth.net wrote:
>
> In addition, some / many of the descriptions are incomplete or confused
> and a competent professional like Bob, Rico and others would reasonably
> want a knowledgable person to look at the problem and describe it
> before profering a suggestion.

Most, if not all, of the descriptions are lacking. This does not stop
some people from exercising their huge jumping-to-conclusion assumption
muscles. In some instances a minimal description is sufficient. In
some instances the most detailed description, including pictures, is
still not enough. Nothing replaces a knowledgeable person eyeballing
the situation.

How about this - anyone can answer any question anyway they want, and
I'll reserve the right to agree with, amend to, or correct that answer.
Sounds fair enough to me.

R


Page 4 of 4       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Outside stairs and safety May 9, 2006, 5:32 am
Electrical Professional May 4, 2008, 4:26 pm
Fire Safety for Rigid Insulation Above Slab August 25, 2006, 1:38 pm
Professional Sales in UK/50 000 GBP per annum + 25 % commission on ALL sales January 29, 2007, 10:12 am
Bad call September 30, 2006, 1:14 am
What do you call April 5, 2008, 10:33 pm
Re: Why don't contractors or subs call if they can't keep appt. July 2, 2006, 7:47 am
Free live call-in advice about constuction. December 3, 2007, 4:15 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap