Home Page link

Re: Unionized

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Unionized PeterD 08-15-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by PeterD on August 15, 2008, 5:33 pm


On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Millwright Ron

>Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive,
>according to a recent report published in Scientific American.
>Millwright Ron
>www.unionright.com

Oh, cite a specific reference (article and issue)... Define 'more
productive'.

Posted by RicodJour on August 15, 2008, 6:39 pm


> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Millwright Ron
> >Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive,
> >according to a recent report published in Scientific American.
> >Millwright Ron
> >www.unionright.com
> Oh, cite a specific reference (article and issue)... Define 'more
> productive'.

Suppose that somebody who doesn't want unions entering their stores,
and I'm not mentioning Wal-Mart's name, wouldn't idiotic pro-union
spamming be a cheap way of giving unions a black eye? I'm not saying
that's what this particular idjit is doing, he may well be an honest
straight forward idjit without a hidden agenda.

R

Posted by Bill on August 15, 2008, 7:12 pm


productive... Only sleep on the job four hours instead if five.


> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Millwright Ron
>>Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive,
>>according to a recent report published in Scientific American.
>>Millwright Ron
>>www.unionright.com
> Oh, cite a specific reference (article and issue)... Define 'more
> productive'.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Unionized August 19, 2008, 8:39 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap