Home Page link

The REAL housing crisis: TOO MANY PEOPLE

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Page 5 of 7       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
The REAL housing crisis: TOO MANY PEOPLE Enough Already 08-16-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Matt Barrow on August 18, 2007, 1:37 am

>>
>>
>>>
>>> Nature has a way of limiting population growth of most any species.
>>> Mankind has, temporarily, gone beyond that bounds.
>>
>> Hardly.
>>
>> Humankind has been more propsperous and healthy than at anytime in
>> history.
>>
>>> One way or another, it will catch up with him. Either slowly in forms
>>> of famine and shrinking of resources; or a major calamity.
>>
>> Yeah, right. Paul Erlich pronouned the same thing and wound up looking
>> like an idiot.
>>
>>> Nature will fix the aftermath.
>>>
>>> Economically, you can't stagnate or shrink the population size and
>>> expect economic growth.
>>
>> Population demographics has very little to do with it. A small
>> free-market nation will always outproduce a large (or small) fascistic
>> one.
>>
>>> You can't make enough people care enough to contribute to such a manual
>>> fix to overpopulation (limiting birthrate to 2 per couple over many,
>>> many generations). It will have to happen on its own.
>>
>> It already is in a sense. Mark Styen has note that, outside the Muslim
>> segments, all populations are heading for rapid decrease. This is only a
>> factor if the next generations are expected to bail out older generations
>> and their profligit welfare/nanny states.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Capitalism is based on more. Of the more, more consumers is part of the
> equation to continue its growth.

Ummm...no.

It is based on expanding production; the number of participants is damn near
irrelevant. (Think: rising boat, not # of boats).

> It is also the basis for Social Security. If there's not more, the
> consumer contribution must increase both for consumer goods and Social
> Security. Its the same thing.

??? you talking about?

>
> To reduce such a needed contribution in a stagnant or reducing population,
> total purchase of consumer goods in dollars must decrease as well as
> Social Security benefits.
>
> Economics 101.

Econ 101 according to whom (or rather, what school?)



Posted by Dave in Houston on August 17, 2007, 5:11 pm


> You can't make enough people care enough to contribute to such a manual
> fix to overpopulation (limiting birthrate to 2 per couple over many, many
> generations). It will have to happen on its own.

Haven't the Chinese addressed this very issue by mandating a very limited
(one?) birthrate. Oh, right; they're godless commies!
--
NuWave Dave in Houston



Posted by Dave on August 18, 2007, 12:41 am
>
>
>> You can't make enough people care enough to contribute to such a manual
>> fix to overpopulation (limiting birthrate to 2 per couple over many, many
>> generations). It will have to happen on its own.
>
> Haven't the Chinese addressed this very issue by mandating a very limited
> (one?) birthrate. Oh, right; they're godless commies!
> --
> NuWave Dave in Houston
>

Get the facts. Its a 2 surviving birth limit. And its NOT voluntary.
Dave



Posted by Dave in Houston on August 18, 2007, 12:54 am

> Get the facts. Its a 2 surviving birth limit. And its NOT voluntary.

That's why I rely on you, Dave.
--
NuWave Dave in Houston



Posted by Dave in Houston on August 18, 2007, 9:41 am

>>
>>
>>> You can't make enough people care enough to contribute to such a manual
>>> fix to overpopulation (limiting birthrate to 2 per couple over many,
>>> many generations). It will have to happen on its own.
>>
>> Haven't the Chinese addressed this very issue by mandating a very limited
>> (one?) birthrate. Oh, right; they're godless commies!
>> --
>> NuWave Dave in Houston
>>
>
> Get the facts. Its a 2 surviving birth limit. And its NOT voluntary.

I believe I used a derivative of the word "mandate," Dave. As in NOT
voluntary though to your credit, you picked up right away that I was unsure
of the maximum number.
Nothing gets by you, Dave.
--
NuWave Dave in Houston



Page 5 of 7       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
The real housing crisis is one of quantity April 19, 2008, 3:29 pm
Why won't builders build what people want? February 8, 2007, 8:31 pm
Real Estate Europe June 2, 2007, 3:48 am
looking for real estate developments in need of funding December 10, 2006, 1:38 am
Invest in Real Estate or Stocks??? July 22, 2008, 6:27 am
FA: Carleton Sheets complete real estate course October 12, 2006, 11:41 am
FREE Real Architect 2007 for AutoCAD LT July 15, 2007, 6:57 pm
Head Construction Division Real Estate - INDIA October 13, 2007, 10:36 am
Move UP in the WORLD of real estate & building - www.Upworld.com December 17, 2007, 5:34 am
Move UP in the WORLD of real estate & building - www.Upworld.com December 17, 2007, 5:43 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap