Home Page link

steel building house revisited

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Page 5 of 13       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
steel building house revisited brianlanning 10-04-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by dpb on October 5, 2006, 5:23 pm

brianlanning wrote:
> dpb wrote:
> > > So why, specifically, shouldn't I consider this?
> >
> > Well, you've been given quite a number of reasons, ....
>
> I didn't ask for reasons for or against a steel building, unless he
> were to come back and tell me that the wood frame shell would be
> cheaper. He says this, but I don't think he's right. Everything I've
> seen says the opposite. ...

I don't think he said the shell would be cheaper but that by the time
you finished converting the metal to a compliant structure it would be
at least equivalent, so why not start the other way?

> ...Maybe he could point me to a modular builder who could beat steel building
prices? ...

IIRC, there were a couple of modular builders and metal-for-residential
builders provided in the previous thread.

...

> What ever happened to people living in the same house for their entire
> lives?

The Industrial Revolution? :)

IF (the "big if") you can make your living in one place and be 100%
assured of that in a changing world, maybe you can, too. It's only
been suggested that the prospect is worth serious consideration.

>
> >Others, based on experience of what it takes to actually
> > make the necessary modifications, contra-indicate that starting with a
> > _commercial_ steel structure would be cost-effective.
>
> What's the difference between comercial and residential construction?
> (this is rhetorical, i know there's a pedantic answer) Am I not
> allowed to use comercial type construction materials in a home?

The big difference in the type of building you're speaking of (or at
least I think you are) is that for the size to meet occupancy codes is
going to require a bunch of openings and other modifications not
present in the (priced) shell. I agree w/ Bob those retrofit costs are
going to be quite a bit higer than you're estimating. (One thing that
comes to me is the elsewhere-mentioned egress rules--to do that in a
building the size you've mentioned essentially means the bedrooms will
have to line the exterior walls, leaving a big hole in the middle.
Granted a large family is going to need a significant amount of room,
but the big rectangle doesn't seem to make for the best layout.)

> And knowing whether something is cost-effective relies on knowing what
> the final costs will be. And that requires a good picture of what the
> final building will be. And I'm still trying to figure this out. ...

Well, the same thing is true on this end...without a whole lot more in
specifications, it's essentially impossible to price materials and
labor.

...
> Another goal we have is to pay for this as we go without a mortgage or
> construction loan. Without a mortgage payment, we should be able to
> pull this off nicely. Instead of paying $3000 a month (plus $1000 a
> month in taxes) to a bank, we could put that $4000 toward new features
> in the house. ....

Well, I don't know how you're going to get the taxes to disappear, so
that's $1000 that's not going to be available...

What this neglects is with a construction loan, you have the money to
actually build the house--where's that going to come from, otherwise,
unless you have deep pockets?
...

> To me, there's a huge difference between "hey you could build this
> building for bla% cheaper by using this method or these materials, go
> to this website or call this company to hear about it" and "your
> idea is terrible. I won't even consider it. mine is cheaper anyway.
> use what I've been blindly using for the last 30 years"
...

If you've been around a.b.c for any length of time, you should by now
have come to the awareness that the fella' that gave you the advice is
far more astute than the average bear and doesn't respond to anything
here off the cuff. If he has advice, you can rest assured it's based
on real world experience.

As noted, there are modular home builders of both conventional
materials as well as some who do metal buildings w/ residential use in
mind. I'd seek some of them out. If you're really wanting to explore
the off-the-beaten-path options, there's the straw house, earth berm,
poured, etc., etc., ... Each has some strengths (and quite a few
disadvantages). There is a reason the conventional frame house
continues to be the leader by far in the US and it isn't because it's
the most expensive possible alternative. On the comparative costs of
the TV-show demo houses and the off-beat things in many of the
magazines, a great percentage of the ones I've seen have had
significant subsidization in their construction from one or more
sources.

> By the way, there are millions of europeans who have bedrooms with no
> closets.

Granted, but it doesn't _necessarily_ make it convenient... :)

...
> > > No. I don't ever want to move again. ...
> >
> > But can you positively predict the future well enough to know you will
> > never have to, want or no want? Seems only prudent to at least plan
> > for such expediencies.
>
> Why would I *have* to? I don't want to live like that. And why are
> you assuming that no one would buy the house? You have no idea what
> the end result will be. We're planning to do this on 5-10 acres. The
> land will have value no matter what. With property values around here,
> I doubt it will be long before the land is worth far more than what it
> costs to put up the building.

I don't know what "like that" means, but--

See above...if you can provide a living for you and the family where
you are, no problem. Not everyone can do that without having to
relocate (at least to the level required/desired, obviously one can
subsist on minimum wage virtually anywhere but not with a large
family). As for resale, it would mostly depend on what you finally
ended up with, what the local market actually is (a highly populated
area would be a lot less risky than rural, simply because there are
more possible buyers), and within those generalities the immediate
market trends. In general, for something the size you're talking of,
the market is going to be pretty small to begin with one would suspect.
If you're in a fast-growing area, you're right that it's possible the
land could become valuable enough somebody would by it simply for the
land itself irrespective of what's on it. Whether that would occur by
the time circumstances changed is anybody's guess. Again, it's
something for consideration, not a hard and fast rule.

...
> I listed cost estimates, shoot them down. That was what I wanted from
> the original post. Some things like plumbing and electrical are
> impossible to estimate, but the well and septic, or the cost to erect
> the buildings, those should be easy to figure out.
...

None of it is possible to really "shoot down" with hard figures as
there is simply far too little in the way of specifications to do more
than generalize. Bob has given $/sf numbers from his experience for
his area. The only way to really get comparative costs is to actually
have at least conceptual designs and essentially go through the
equivalent of what the bid-making process would be for a contractor as
if you were the gc.


Posted by brianlanning on October 5, 2006, 6:32 pm
dpb wrote:
> > What ever happened to people living in the same house for their entire
> > lives?
>
> The Industrial Revolution? :)
>
> IF (the "big if") you can make your living in one place and be 100%
> assured of that in a changing world, maybe you can, too. It's only
> been suggested that the prospect is worth serious consideration.

I think it depends on how you structure your life. Conventional wisdom
is that your house is "good debt" and "your most valuable asset". (I
contend that no debt is good debt and your house is a liability, not an
asset.) So most people go out and get a big mortgage because it's good
for your taxes. This ties them to a certain job or area. If the
factory closes or something happens to your job, you suddenly have to
move in order to follow the dollars. Maybe you can't afford the
mortgage anymore. I'm not setup that way anymore. We have no debt at
the moment and the though of taking on a mortgage is killing us. So
we're thinking about other alternatives to the standard way of doing
things. This is just a thought exercise to see if we can come up with
an interesting house and an interesting way to get it. We're also
planning a location that gives me access to several markets. And
regardless, our expenses are low enough that I can do a lot of things
and be just fine.


> > What's the difference between comercial and residential construction?
> > (this is rhetorical, i know there's a pedantic answer) Am I not
> > allowed to use comercial type construction materials in a home?
>
> The big difference in the type of building you're speaking of (or at
> least I think you are) is that for the size to meet occupancy codes is
> going to require a bunch of openings and other modifications not
> present in the (priced) shell. I agree w/ Bob those retrofit costs are
> going to be quite a bit higer than you're estimating. (One thing that
> comes to me is the elsewhere-mentioned egress rules--

When we finished the basement in our last house, we were allowed to
make as many rooms as we wanted, but if we wanted to call them
bedrooms, we had to have the egress window. Most of the building code
seems like common sense to me. So our plan was to have normal windows
in all the bedrooms anyway, just more bedrooms. Before they're there
though, they wouldn't be bedrooms. Just open space. So there wouldn't
be a need for egress windows since there would be many other ways to
get out of the big area.


>to do that in a
> building the size you've mentioned essentially means the bedrooms will
> have to line the exterior walls, leaving a big hole in the middle.
> Granted a large family is going to need a significant amount of room,
> but the big rectangle doesn't seem to make for the best layout.)

I put together a design in visio laying out all the interior walls and
what would fit where. The bedrooms do line all the exterior walls, and
they ended up being about 12x14 which is normal for the houses in this
area anyway. That did make sort of a large livingroom type area in the
middle, but it wasn't that much bigger.


> > And knowing whether something is cost-effective relies on knowing what
> > the final costs will be. And that requires a good picture of what the
> > final building will be. And I'm still trying to figure this out. ...
>
> Well, the same thing is true on this end...without a whole lot more in
> specifications, it's essentially impossible to price materials and
> labor.

I agree. But some things should be fixed cost or easy to estimate.
Things like the well and septic or the cost of pouring the slab.



> Well, I don't know how you're going to get the taxes to disappear, so
> that's $1000 that's not going to be available...

Where we're going doesn't have the huge tax. But where we are now
does. That's why we didn't buy a house here.

> What this neglects is with a construction loan, you have the money
to
> actually build the house--where's that going to come from, otherwise,
> unless you have deep pockets?

No construction loan. We'll have to save for about a year, maybe two.

> If you've been around a.b.c for any length of time, you should by now
> have come to the awareness that the fella' that gave you the advice is
> far more astute than the average bear and doesn't respond to anything
> here off the cuff. If he has advice, you can rest assured it's based
> on real world experience.

That's probably true. But I have a number of sources contradicting
things he said. Who's right? Probably both are right depending on the
location and a thousand other variables.


> > By the way, there are millions of europeans who have bedrooms with no
> > closets.
>
> Granted, but it doesn't _necessarily_ make it convenient... :)

They just use armoires and other furniture instead of closets.


> > Why would I *have* to? I don't want to live like that. And why are
> > you assuming that no one would buy the house? You have no idea what
> > the end result will be. We're planning to do this on 5-10 acres. The
> > land will have value no matter what. With property values around here,
> > I doubt it will be long before the land is worth far more than what it
> > costs to put up the building.
>
> I don't know what "like that" means, but--

living such that it's possble to be forced to move because of money.


(snipped stuff about market values)

We're considering all the possabilities. We're just more focused on
what we want this time since the plan is to stay there long term.


> None of it is possible to really "shoot down" with hard figures as
> there is simply far too little in the way of specifications to do more
> than generalize. Bob has given $/sf numbers from his experience for
> his area. The only way to really get comparative costs is to actually
> have at least conceptual designs and essentially go through the
> equivalent of what the bid-making process would be for a contractor as
> if you were the gc.

I was hoping for things like estimates for digging wells where we are.
Or how much is concrete in lower wisconsin? How many dollars a square
for flatwork? How thick should the slab be? When are footers required
under load bearing interior walls? Did you hear about this or that
product, or see that show, or see that website about a house that's
similar? Or talk about types of insulation that would work, or what
people did in their shops. Or building manufacturers who have done
this before, or who to stay away from. Or how thick the steel should
be. Things like this. Instead I got something entirely different.
None of it wrong, just not what I was looking for.

brian


Posted by Wayne Whitney on October 5, 2006, 6:48 pm

> When are footers required under load bearing interior walls?

Always? I'm not an engineer, but the basic idea is that the load
ultimately has to be transferred to the soil beneath the foundation.
So if your interior load bearing wall is to transfer that load down,
it will need a footer to spread the load out over the soil.

Cheers, Wayne


Posted by Bob Morrison on October 5, 2006, 7:33 pm
In a previous post brianlanning wrote...
> I was hoping for things like estimates for digging wells where we are.
> Or how much is concrete in lower wisconsin? How many dollars a square
> for flatwork? How thick should the slab be? When are footers required
> under load bearing interior walls? Did you hear about this or that
> product, or see that show, or see that website about a house that's
> similar? Or talk about types of insulation that would work, or what
> people did in their shops. Or building manufacturers who have done
> this before, or who to stay away from. Or how thick the steel should
> be. Things like this. Instead I got something entirely different.
> None of it wrong, just not what I was looking for.
>

You are asking for an engineered design. I don't give that advice away
for free since that's what I do for living.

--
Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
Structural & Civil Engineering
Poulsbo WA
bob at rlmorrisonengr dot com

Posted by dpb on October 5, 2006, 7:48 pm

brianlanning wrote:
> dpb wrote:
...

> contend that no debt is good debt and your house is a liability, not an
> asset....

I contend your viewpoint is at best as narrow-minded thinking as you're
accusing others here of, and at worst simply and blatantly wrong... :)

...

> > Well, the same thing is true on this end...without a whole lot more in
> > specifications, it's essentially impossible to price materials and
> > labor.
>
> I agree. But some things should be fixed cost or easy to estimate.
> Things like the well and septic or the cost of pouring the slab.

Those things a simple phone call will answer far more precisely for
your area than anyone here can tell you. But as you pointed out
before, those are immaterial of the question of the style of house
construction.

...

> No construction loan. We'll have to save for about a year, maybe two.

If you have that kind of disposable income to save a hundred thou or so
in a couple of years, power to you...not many do.

> > If you've been around a.b.c for any length of time, you should by now
> > have come to the awareness that the fella' that gave you the advice is
> > far more astute than the average bear and doesn't respond to anything
> > here off the cuff. If he has advice, you can rest assured it's based
> > on real world experience.
>
> That's probably true. But I have a number of sources contradicting
> things he said. Who's right? Probably both are right depending on the
> location and a thousand other variables.

None of which are available to anyone here in other than generalities,
either...
Not knowing any of these other "sources" nor what they're contention is
about what, it would certainly be hard to refute them. As you say, in
the region of applicibility, they may well be right. OTOH, they might
not be. Either way, it's not enough undoubtedly to be able to make any
real decision on.

> > > By the way, there are millions of europeans who have bedrooms with no
> > > closets.
> >
> > Granted, but it doesn't _necessarily_ make it convenient... :)
>
> They just use armoires and other furniture instead of closets.

And, from my visits, they tend to have a different definiton of
"convencience" than I... :)

> > > Why would I *have* to? I don't want to live like that. ...
..
> > I don't know what "like that" means, but--
>
> living such that it's possble to be forced to move because of money.

Fine objective, if you can arrange it. Some can, some can't...
...

> > None of it is possible to really "shoot down" with hard figures as
> > there is simply far too little in the way of specifications to do more
> > than generalize. Bob has given $/sf numbers from his experience for
> > his area. The only way to really get comparative costs is to actually
> > have at least conceptual designs and essentially go through the
> > equivalent of what the bid-making process would be for a contractor as
> > if you were the gc.
>
> I was hoping for things like estimates for digging wells where we are.
> Or how much is concrete in lower wisconsin? How many dollars a square
> for flatwork?

OK, as noted above, all these could be fairly easily determined by
using the yellow pages and a telephone.

How thick should the slab be? When are footers required
> under load bearing interior walls?

These kinds of questions are only answerable for a specific design
other than again the generalities of regular floor slabs are usually
about 4", and footers are needed where there's sufficient load to
require them (doh!). How much load is going to be where is going to be
a function of what you build and how it is built which is why so much
of what you're asking about isn't possible to be answered.


Did you hear about this or that
> product, or see that show, or see that website about a house that's
> similar? Or talk about types of insulation that would work, or what
> people did in their shops. Or building manufacturers who have done
> this before, or who to stay away from. Or how thick the steel should
> be. Things like this. Instead I got something entirely different.
> None of it wrong, just not what I was looking for.

I think you're looking for essentially the impossible in a forum such
as this.

I think there have been other suggestions, none of which seem to meet
your criteria.


Page 5 of 13       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Steel building questions August 12, 2006, 1:25 am
The Benefits Of Building With Steel October 13, 2007, 12:47 pm
Great Steel Building Site!!! September 21, 2007, 6:41 am
Steel Building Components - The Evolution of Construction September 22, 2007, 11:48 am
RE-erecting a steel building, north florida, alachua county...a few questions September 5, 2006, 11:12 am
Hi all. New Member...building house. May 11, 2007, 10:01 pm
Dog House Building And Buying Guide January 9, 2008, 7:45 am
Porch railing height revisited October 9, 2006, 3:07 pm
Re: Anti-slam / door damper devices? [revisited...] UPDATE #2 August 4, 2006, 12:07 pm
Steel I Beams December 27, 2006, 12:33 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap