Home Page link

strong concrete block walls

Home| Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?

Building Construction - Building Construction Industry Discussions. 

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
strong concrete block walls PaulS 04-10-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by RicodJour on April 12, 2008, 11:54 am
>
> Former Hoosier. 36" should be good for that area.
>
> I wouldn't pour a footing for a doghouse without a
> couple #4 rebar's in it.

Well, that's pretty interesting considering who's saying it. You're
an old timer and you often point out about the benefits of old time
construction. They didn't use rebar in footings for generations, so
what's happened to the soil recently that it's now required in every
situation? Right, nothing.

Code is an attempt to create a one-size-fits-all building. If a
builder knows what they're doing, and take into account local
conditions and compensates for them, there is no need for rebar. If
Code calls for it, well, you have no choice and you have to put it
in. That doesn't mean that the rebar actually adds any benefit and it
does not compensate for poor foundation practices.

R

Real Goods Solar, Inc.
Posted by Glenn on April 12, 2008, 12:12 pm

> wrote:
>>
>> Former Hoosier. 36" should be good for that area.
>>
>> I wouldn't pour a footing for a doghouse without a
>> couple #4 rebar's in it.
>
> Well, that's pretty interesting considering who's
> saying it. You're
> an old timer and you often point out about the
> benefits of old time
> construction. They didn't use rebar in footings for
> generations, so
> what's happened to the soil recently that it's now
> required in every
> situation? Right, nothing.
>
> Code is an attempt to create a one-size-fits-all
> building. If a
> builder knows what they're doing, and take into
> account local
> conditions and compensates for them, there is no need
> for rebar. If
> Code calls for it, well, you have no choice and you
> have to put it
> in. That doesn't mean that the rebar actually adds
> any benefit and it
> does not compensate for poor foundation practices.
>
> R

Most don't use rebar in driveways either but I want
#4, 24" ew just because I like my driveway to stay
together.

Code around here calls for 2 #4 in footings, so just
habit I suppose.

Yeah, I go back to where we used 18" stone basement
foundations directly on the ground with no footings.
I'll take steel to stop the cracking they did.
Cheapest thing for what they do in the whole
building...



Posted by RicodJour on April 12, 2008, 10:05 am
>
> > Hello, I will build a concrete block wall 4 blocks high for a garage.
> > Three of the courses will be below grade. I want to make this wall as
> > strong as practically possible. (I could not use a poured wall because of
> > access problems). I live in a freeze/thaw area. I want to use some rebar
> > in the cores for strength. Should these cores with rebar be filled with
> > concrete or mortar? Also anything I can do to prevent cracking from the
> > freeze/thaw cycles? Would a control joint on each wall make sense?
>
> Basically I don't want the wall to crack. It will sit on a 8 x 16 footer at
> the frost line. The wall will be 4 blocks high with 3 below ground. My
> concern was could expansion/contraction from freezing/thawing crack the
> wall? And if so, is there anything I can do to prevent this?
> I'm not sure this would normally happen, so maybe it's not a problem, but
> since I don't know I sent the post. I will use the rebar in the footer and
> at 4' as DanG suggested.

I just did a quick check on frost line depth in Indiana, and depending
on where you are, it can vary from 30" to 42". The first thing you
should do is verify the frost line design criteria.

The buried portion of the foundation does not usually have a big
problem with freeze/thaw. If you're garage is unheated and there's
soil on both sides of the foundation, there's almost no chance of a
problem. Freeze/thaw
only becomes an issue if there is a fair amount of water in the soil.
While you are excavating your foundation, you should determine what
sort of soil you have and it's drainage capabilities. If there are
any doubts, you can put in drainage tile (not actually tile, it's
really pipe) around the perimeter, and/or use gravel and sand in the
backfill.

Rebar in footings is unnecessary unless you have doubts about your
soil or if your subgrade preparations are faulty. A couple pieces of
rebar won't make the footing act like a beam, it will just keep the
pieces together, and, frankly, it's extremely rare for different
sections of a footing/foundation to have any appreciable differential
settlement unless the soil conditions and drainage are poor, or your
subgrade preparations are faulty.

I guess you catch my drift by this point. If you don't take into
account the soil conditions, drainage and subgrade preparations, any
work you do after that will be at risk. 'Superior' construction won't
negate those failures.

R

Posted by DanG on April 12, 2008, 10:50 am
The two #5 bars continuous proper laps and corner bars are code
required minimum here. Perhaps the OP is not in a code compliance
situation, but I would put it in as a minimum. Engineer designed
would be higher.

--
______________________________
Keep the whole world singing . . . .
DanG (remove the sevens)
dgriff237@7cox.net



>>
>> > Hello, I will build a concrete block wall 4 blocks high for a
>> > garage.
>> > Three of the courses will be below grade. I want to make
>> > this wall as
>> > strong as practically possible. (I could not use a poured
>> > wall because of
>> > access problems). I live in a freeze/thaw area. I want to
>> > use some rebar
>> > in the cores for strength. Should these cores with rebar be
>> > filled with
>> > concrete or mortar? Also anything I can do to prevent
>> > cracking from the
>> > freeze/thaw cycles? Would a control joint on each wall make
>> > sense?
>>
>> Basically I don't want the wall to crack. It will sit on a 8 x
>> 16 footer at
>> the frost line. The wall will be 4 blocks high with 3 below
>> ground. My
>> concern was could expansion/contraction from freezing/thawing
>> crack the
>> wall? And if so, is there anything I can do to prevent this?
>> I'm not sure this would normally happen, so maybe it's not a
>> problem, but
>> since I don't know I sent the post. I will use the rebar in
>> the footer and
>> at 4' as DanG suggested.
>
> I just did a quick check on frost line depth in Indiana, and
> depending
> on where you are, it can vary from 30" to 42". The first thing
> you
> should do is verify the frost line design criteria.
>
> The buried portion of the foundation does not usually have a big
> problem with freeze/thaw. If you're garage is unheated and
> there's
> soil on both sides of the foundation, there's almost no chance
> of a
> problem. Freeze/thaw
> only becomes an issue if there is a fair amount of water in the
> soil.
> While you are excavating your foundation, you should determine
> what
> sort of soil you have and it's drainage capabilities. If there
> are
> any doubts, you can put in drainage tile (not actually tile,
> it's
> really pipe) around the perimeter, and/or use gravel and sand in
> the
> backfill.
>
> Rebar in footings is unnecessary unless you have doubts about
> your
> soil or if your subgrade preparations are faulty. A couple
> pieces of
> rebar won't make the footing act like a beam, it will just keep
> the
> pieces together, and, frankly, it's extremely rare for different
> sections of a footing/foundation to have any appreciable
> differential
> settlement unless the soil conditions and drainage are poor, or
> your
> subgrade preparations are faulty.
>
> I guess you catch my drift by this point. If you don't take
> into
> account the soil conditions, drainage and subgrade preparations,
> any
> work you do after that will be at risk. 'Superior' construction
> won't
> negate those failures.
>
> R



Posted by Roscoe P Pendoscoe on April 19, 2008, 9:13 am

>The two #5 bars continuous proper laps and corner bars are code
>required minimum here. Perhaps the OP is not in a code compliance
>situation, but I would put it in as a minimum. Engineer designed
>would be higher.

I may have missed it but has anyone suggests a "permit" might be
required for this job? In my area, I can go to the local city hall and
ASK for the proper depths and construction practice that is
acceptable. The inspector who will come out to look and see if your
footings are in fact deep enough generally will give a homeowner
guidance short ort of taking responsibility but will tell you what he
expects to see in order to sigh off on the job.

I cannot see where a permanent building like this would not require
one. Pretty hard to hide it if you want to forgo a permit but if you
want to do it w/o permit, you can still ask the "what if I wanted to
do, such and such"?

They would give some info better than the guessing game you are
playing. The fellas giving you advice are going from experience and
most likely know their job well but they won't be there to help you
correct it if the local building inspector makes you do it. Big job,
make sure you do it right the first time.

Good Luck,

Roscoe aka Rick





Knowledge is like money, the less you talk about it
the more people assume you have.

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
running electrical in new CMU block walls July 9, 2006, 3:05 pm
engineered cinder block walls September 28, 2006, 11:21 pm
anchors in concrete block September 7, 2006, 9:55 am
concrete block N7, and RSJ question October 21, 2007, 3:01 pm
Supporting Lifted Concrete Block August 8, 2006, 8:22 am
Help Please: Concrete Block House Design December 20, 2006, 9:11 am
concrete block house and ceilings/floors November 14, 2007, 9:07 am
Practicality of 2x8 walls February 1, 2007, 10:02 am
Help! The walls are falling down! February 8, 2007, 11:10 am
Bathtub walls March 21, 2007, 4:35 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap