|
Posted by Bipolar Bear on January 23, 2009, 3:20 am
> > The registers are not supposed to be adjusted after the initial air
> > balancing. the system is designed to maintain a constant, even
temperature
> > throughout the house. Closing off rooms is like trying to partition off
part
> > of your refrigerator or oven that you not using. It will actually cost
you
> > more in utility bills and comfort, not to mention that it can be
detrimental
> > to the system itself. "pull chain" registers went out in the 1970s as
techs
> > and contractors learned more about building science.
> I see. Well, I think I have a bit of a special case, and would like
> to find a source nevertheless. My home is over a hundred years old &
> I have several rooms that get too hot or too cold, depending on where
> the sun is. The folks that installed the HVAC system five years ago
> tried their best, I'm sure, but we've never found a way to keep all
> the rooms comfortable. Being able to adjust on the fly, while perhaps
> not the best solution, is the the only one I can come up with.
Yeah he is so full of himself <or full of bullshit take your pick same diff>
Sorry--dunno about your pull chain registers but zoned hvac system using
multiple thermostats and automatic opening dampers is still alive and in
fact is one of the few arena here that is still thriving, but he likes to
scare people and mis-inform them by saying shit like "its against the law
for me to install a used fossil appliance" and he thinks its okay to imply
that it will cost more to heat only a camp trailer that's parked in a barn
than it would cost for someone to heat the entire old drafty barn to the
same temp.
Nut job IOW
--
|
> or reduce the heat pouring in to certain rooms. Our current ceiling
> registers can only be dampened with a screwdriver (what a dumb idea!)
> and that sort of precludes daily adjustment.
> Years ago, I lived in a home where all the ceiling registers had pull
> chains. I've looked & looked & not found anything. Do any of you
> gurus have a source?
> Thank you,
> ME