|
Posted by Noon-Air on September 1, 2006, 11:31 am
>I got a tech out to do a leak search on my circa-2000 R-410a system (have
>needed 2 recharges this summer) and he detected a leak in the evaporator
>coil (he was using some Johnson Controls sniffer).
>
> The coil was labeled with some application labels and one line read
> "Refrigerent: R22". I asked the tech about it and he said he didn't
> think it was right; after a couple of calls, there was some difference of
> opinion among his supervisors about whether it should be replaced at no
> cost because it was the wrong part.
>
> One of the tech's supervisors said there's a regulator fitting just in
> front of the supply side of the coil that could be swapped out, making the
> coil suitable for use with R-410a. Another reference said that this coil
> was pressure-tested for R-410a pressures and should be OK (I think the
> pressure testing number on the coil label was 450psi).
>
> Is it possible to make a valid case that some corner was cut and an
> inappropriate or inferior part was used when the system was installed? Or
> are they right and the coil was an acceptable part when installed?
>
> I'm ever-so-slightly out of warranty, and if there's a reasonable argument
> to made that a bad/wrong/less-than-durable part was used in place of a
> more technically correct or durable part, it'd probably not cost me
> anything or just some percentage of the replacement coil price.
The correct coil should have been installed in the first place... and there
are a couple of manufacturers that have had a problem with leaky coils...
Carrier comes to mind........
|