|
Posted by on June 12, 2007, 6:19 pm
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:20:55 -0700, someone wrote:
>
> >...Someone who is thorough, will use correct
> >inputs, and won't cut corners on the formulas.
> >
> To what end is the need to be that precise? They will just size it to
> the nearest ton (or maybe half ton) anyway. It's not like it's going
> to make much difference if it comes out 38,052 btu/hr for the anal
> retentive guy, or 41,019 btu/hr for the good enough for government
> work guy.
>
>
> Reply to NG only - this e.mail address goes to a kill file.
Might as well guess on everything, Eh?
|