|
Posted by Bubba on January 19, 2007, 7:11 pm
On 19 Jan 2007 23:30:14 GMT, DANgER (danger@heat.com) wrote:
>Well I think outside temperature is the biggest factor with setbacks.
Exactly why you are so clueless
>I agree the money you save during the initial setback to low heat is roughly
>what it will cost to reheat to high heat, but I disagree a little when they
>mention savings throughout the following 8 hrs of setback. Sure the house is
>down to 15c but it now runs to maintain 15c, the same way it woul run to
>maintain 20c. So where's the savings? Your initial setback savings are spent
>reheating back to high temp.
Thus the reason you aren't the brightest bulb in the bunch.
>
>"You save fuel between the time that the temperature stabilizes at the lower
>level and the next time heat is needed."
Oh my, a genius! You didnt hurt your brain on that one did you,
Canuck?
>
>If it's -15c outside I don't think there would be much of an off period and
>therefore not much savings. I would like to see these "studies" that website
>mentions.
It wouldnt do any good. It would be way over your head. Stick to "Dick
and Jane" books. Lots of pictures.
>
>Am I missing something here?
>
Just a brain. Canucks dont come with them. Its an option. You couldnt
afford it on your $100 a day plus beer.
Bubba
>-Canadian Heat
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap