|
Posted by on October 29, 2009, 8:48 pm
>>> You're think that an EE would realize velocity <> airflow
>>> VOLUME.
>> I admit that my skills in fluid dynamics are weak.
>> I'd been working with the assumption that I could get a
>> reasonable first-order approximation to airflow by multiplying
>> the average velocity across the duct times the area of the duct.
>> Given that the duct size didn't change, the relative volumes
>> should be the same as the relative velocities...to first order
>> for small changes. I assumed I could ignore the small changes in
>> air density due to the small change in pressure within the duct.
>> Please disclose the additional math required to determine the
>> airflow volume with sufficient accuracy to solve the noise problem
>> described.
>> Thank you for your willingness to educate.
>> mike
>HINT:
>LOOK UP REYNALD'S NUMBER.
I just talked to him the other day. Watcha need ?
--
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm
|
>>> VOLUME.