|
Posted by Noon-Air on April 15, 2007, 12:51 pm
>> I just got back home and found the bottom blew out today on seven of the
>> ten
>> stocks I own, DARN. I know they will recover, but heck, it ticks me off.
>> Anyone here dabble in stocks/bonds?
>
> Do you want to "dabble" in the market, or do you want to invest with
> some long-term goal in mind?
>
> When I dabbled, I did silly things like buying more and more Lucent
> (LU) as its price shot up to over $80. Then it shot down, and I rode
> it all the way to $2 before I finally sold.
Too bad, I only had 2 shares of LU when it crashed, and when it got down to
$0.58/share, I bought $500 more. :-)
Dividends are re-invested.
I have also been holding a bunch of AT&T, Comcast, Wyeth(started out as
American Home Products), BP Oil, Exxon, and several others.
> For my "investments" for the most part, I use low-cost index mutual
> funds that offer broad market exposure. You would not do wrong by
> putting your money in Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index and Total
> Bond Market Index and letting it ride. The allocation between these
> two would have more effect on long-term performance that any other
> factor.
> I've done very well in REITs but some of the bloom is off that rose,
> although I still have positions in SPG and MAC. I used to also have
> GGP, which is nearly a twin to SPG. I sold it and some of my SPG to
> limit my investment in this area to no more that 5% of my total
> portfolio. In hindsight, keeping GGP and selling SPG would have be a
> slightly better move, but with dividend reinvestment, I'm still up
> over 500%, with a per share cost basis of -$24/share!
I am waiting for interest rates to go up again to buy into Ginnie Mae again.
> BTW, this personal 5% rule of mine would have me (or you) owning no
> fewer than 20 stocks if I was investing only in individual issues.
>
> IMHO, there is way too much emphasis put on "beating the market". If
> your goal is to have $XX when you need it and you can achieve that
> goal by realizing 90% of the market's return with lower risk, isn't
> that enough? Who cares whether you "beat" the next guy?
>
> You must decide: are you engaged in a competitive sport or are you
> investing for your future?
Its not about "beating" anything, its about long term investment, and when I
get closer to retirement, putting it into a managed no-load fund to get the
income, and not having to worry with it.
|