If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Richard J Kinch on May 16, 2007, 2:25 pm
Jay-n-123 writes:
> Which systems are more reliable, those that use R22 vs. R410a? Are
> R410a systems REALLY as reliable R22?
R-22 runs at much lower pressures and systems using it are therefore
cheaper and more reliable, other things being equal. A given 410a system
could be reliable enough, but only at some higher relative cost.
410a systems only exist because of politics, not technical merits.
|
|
Posted by Jay-n-123 on May 16, 2007, 2:35 pm
Do you think I should plan on gettting a new R22 system by 2009 since they
stop making R22 systems in 2010? (My existing system is 20 years old)
<<R-22 runs at much lower pressures and systems using it are therefore
cheaper and more reliable, other things being equal. A given 410a system
could be reliable enough, but only at some higher relative cost.
410a systems only exist because of politics, not technical merits.>>
|
|
Posted by Noon-Air on May 16, 2007, 2:49 pm
> Do you think I should plan on gettting a new R22 system by 2009 since they
> stop making R22 systems in 2010? (My existing system is 20 years old)
> <<R-22 runs at much lower pressures and systems using it are therefore
> cheaper and more reliable, other things being equal. A given 410a system
> could be reliable enough, but only at some higher relative cost.
Currently, the R-22 systems are more expensive that the R-410a systems of
the same size and efficiency
|
|
Posted by Tony on May 17, 2007, 3:38 pm
First Thank you Mr. Kinch
You are the first person that I read in these forum
about Refrigerant 410,
I personally I do not find anything good about R-410.
but then all new refrigerants are not that great
with exception of R-508B all rest run with high temp. discharge
if system develop leak on low side 9 to 1 you must change oil
because you can not take moisture out of oil, so what it's good
about this new refrigerant I have no idea.
However Manufactures loves R-410 because it makes compressors
more efficient specifically Scrowl no that is not correct, "actually all
compressors other then reciprocal" again because
it is easier for them to assemble the system and compressors are
cheaper there is no other benefits from this refrigerant
I regard to piping size you can always use higher pressure
refrigerants on the older systems that was using lower
pressure refrigerant of the same capacities.
Note yes R-22 manufacture will stop making new gas
but recycled gas will be on market for long time after that.
Tony
www.cas-environ.com
> Jay-n-123 writes:
>> Which systems are more reliable, those that use R22 vs. R410a? Are
>> R410a systems REALLY as reliable R22?
> R-22 runs at much lower pressures and systems using it are therefore
> cheaper and more reliable, other things being equal. A given 410a system
> could be reliable enough, but only at some higher relative cost.
> 410a systems only exist because of politics, not technical merits.
|
|
Posted by Bob_Loblaw on May 17, 2007, 5:21 pm
> First Thank you Mr. Kinch
> You are the first person that I read in these forum
> about Refrigerant 410,
You must be new here....
> I personally I do not find anything good about R-410.
> but then all new refrigerants are not that great
> with exception of R-508B all rest run with high temp. discharge
So what?
How does that make them poor refrigerants?
> if system develop leak on low side 9 to 1 you must change oil
> because you can not take moisture out of oil,
A leak on the low side doesn't mean moisture will get into the system.
It's still under pressure. How do you figure external moisture is going
to overcome the pressure of the refrigerant leaking out and infiltrate
the system?
>so what it's good
> about this new refrigerant I have no idea.
Maybe take a night school course.
> However Manufactures loves R-410 because it makes compressors
> more efficient specifically Scrowl no that is not correct, "actually
> all compressors other then reciprocal" again because
> it is easier for them to assemble the system and compressors are
> cheaper there is no other benefits from this refrigerant
Where are you getting this shit from??
Did this come to you in a dream???
--
"Poor Canada. So desperate to be the socialist nirvana of multicultural
heaven, that it ends up being used and abused by the dregs of the world.
Oh, the joys of diversity!"
Respectfully, Bob
|
Page 4 of 15 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | R410a | July 9, 2007, 7:19 pm |
| Re: R410a hoses?? | August 30, 2006, 12:34 pm |
| Re: R410a hoses?? | August 31, 2006, 9:05 am |
| Puron vs. R22 in new AC unit | June 7, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| Re: Compressor noise R22 vs R410A | September 28, 2006, 2:08 pm |
| Re: Compressor noise R22 vs R410A | September 28, 2006, 11:02 pm |
| Compressor noise R22 vs R410A | September 24, 2006, 2:43 am |
| Arcoair 13 Seer R410A 3 Ton | July 28, 2008, 12:01 pm |
| Re-use R22 line set for Puron system | November 4, 2006, 6:24 pm |
| Puron and Freon - Just Scams? | August 13, 2008, 5:36 pm |
|
|
> R410a systems REALLY as reliable R22?