Home Page link

Radiant Catalytic Ionization ????

HVAC Discussions - Heating, ventilation and air conditioning. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Radiant Catalytic Ionization ???? Bob Pietrangelo 06-16-2007
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Bob Pietrangelo on June 16, 2007, 2:30 am
Does anyone have any experience with one of these duct mounted devices. The
Fresh Air model by Quest International was originally developed as a Free
Standing Unit, and the independent research of this device actually showed
high levels of Ozone production (.05 ppm). The one I am questioning about
is the duct mounted model called the Ductworx or something like that. It is
supposed to be mounted in the supply plenum, and only produces negligible
amounts of O3.

I still believe that the Sanuvox R1500-4000 is the best residential UV
system on the market. What I liked about this other device is that it
supposedly disperses products that actually clean objects in the conditioned
air, downstream duct work and insulation, rather than what just enters the
return plenum.

I have read the Kansas State tests and believe this claim of theirs, but I
can find no conclusive evidence of this duct mounted device producing or not
producing toxic levels of Ozone. I have seen and believe the other testing
of their free standing device does produce too much ozone.

I have spent the last two days researching this and cannot find anything.
Does anyone else have anything to contribute to this. PLEASE NO SALES
RHETORIC.

They claim to use a UVX spectrum of UV light. There is no such spectrum.
It is a luminescence tester, or a Homogenized Radiation System operating in
the 360 - 380 nm, that is all I could find out about other than some vacuum
cleaner claims to use it to sanitize floors ( more BS I am sure)

I had the salesmen in my office the other day, and I like the product, but
do not want to install it if it is a high ozone producing device. They are
wholesaling for about $350. He was also pushing a device called the Power
Shaver, it reduces energy consumption of any motor (not VS) in your home and
can be hooked up to your electrical panel and it will be effective at
reducing the energy consumption of any motor in your home, i.e. blower
motors, washing machines, fans. I have done no research on it yet, but saw
the demonstration and I'll be damned if it didn't drop consumption by about
30%. It might be snake oil, I am not sure yet.

By the way, what I have discovered (or rather reconfirmed) is that all UV
stick lights are ONLY effective at object cleaning, do not air purify, and
they ALL are pretty much the same. They do not increase efficiency, they
reduce mold and bacteria growth on what ever they are in constant contact
with. A filter keeps your friggin coil clean.

Sanuvox by the way has a couple of really good pps' and videos about it's
products in the contractor sections of their site, I recommend them to be
viewed. http://sanuvox.com/video_presentations.htm

--
Bob Pietrangelo
bobp3@comcast.net (home)
bob@comfort-solution.biz (work)
www.comfort-solution.biz







Posted by Mo Hoaner on June 16, 2007, 11:33 am

> Does anyone have any experience with one of these duct mounted devices.
> The Fresh Air model by Quest International was originally developed as a
> Free Standing Unit, and the independent research of this device actually
> showed high levels of Ozone production (.05 ppm). The one I am
> questioning about is the duct mounted model called the Ductworx or
> something like that. It is supposed to be mounted in the supply plenum,
> and only produces negligible amounts of O3.
>
> I still believe that the Sanuvox R1500-4000 is the best residential UV
> system on the market. What I liked about this other device is that it
> supposedly disperses products that actually clean objects in the
> conditioned air, downstream duct work and insulation, rather than what
> just enters the return plenum.

Unless it's drawing "products" from a container to be dispensed, there's
nothing to clean downstream air. Even if there was cleaning performed, where
is the stuff "cleaned off" going. Some sort of extractor before the air is
discharged?

> I have read the Kansas State tests and believe this claim of theirs, but I
> can find no conclusive evidence of this duct mounted device producing or
> not producing toxic levels of Ozone. I have seen and believe the other
> testing of their free standing device does produce too much ozone.
>
> I have spent the last two days researching this and cannot find anything.
> Does anyone else have anything to contribute to this. PLEASE NO SALES
> RHETORIC.
>
> They claim to use a UVX spectrum of UV light. There is no such spectrum.
> It is a luminescence tester, or a Homogenized Radiation System operating
> in the 360 - 380 nm, that is all I could find out about other than some
> vacuum cleaner claims to use it to sanitize floors ( more BS I am sure)

If you read the Kansas report, it is written by what appears to be a
distributor of their product. It gives intake counts well above what they
list as typical, and output counts well below what is considered typical.
The person writing the report does not list any qualifications. UVX probably
means that their lamp emits multiple wavelengths of UV light - as do all
UV-C lamps.
http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/spectroscope/amici.html#1blackp


> I had the salesmen in my office the other day, and I like the product, but
> do not want to install it if it is a high ozone producing device. They
> are wholesaling for about $350. He was also pushing a device called the
> Power Shaver, it reduces energy consumption of any motor (not VS) in your
> home and can be hooked up to your electrical panel and it will be
> effective at reducing the energy consumption of any motor in your home,
> i.e. blower motors, washing machines, fans. I have done no research on it
> yet, but saw the demonstration and I'll be damned if it didn't drop
> consumption by about 30%. It might be snake oil, I am not sure yet.

Think about this for a second..... There are devices that can play games
with input waveforms to reduce apparent power for motors, but they only work
with a single motor, and generally result in reducing the speed of the motor
to more closely match what is required at the time. Anything that claims to
reduce power consumption of individual devices by doing something to bulk
power has got to be snake oil.

> By the way, what I have discovered (or rather reconfirmed) is that all UV
> stick lights are ONLY effective at object cleaning, do not air purify, and
> they ALL are pretty much the same. They do not increase efficiency, they
> reduce mold and bacteria growth on what ever they are in constant contact
> with. A filter keeps your friggin coil clean.
>
> Sanuvox by the way has a couple of really good pps' and videos about it's
> products in the contractor sections of their site, I recommend them to be
> viewed. http://sanuvox.com/video_presentations.htm
>
> --
> Bob Pietrangelo
> bobp3@comcast.net (home)
> bob@comfort-solution.biz (work)
> www.comfort-solution.biz
>
>
>
>
>
>



Posted by Jake on June 20, 2007, 7:10 pm
Mo Hoaner wrote:
>
> Think about this for a second..... There are devices that can play games
> with input waveforms to reduce apparent power for motors, but they only work
> with a single motor, and generally result in reducing the speed of the motor
> to more closely match what is required at the time. Anything that claims to
> reduce power consumption of individual devices by doing something to bulk
> power has got to be snake oil.
>


Yep... snake oil it is....

http://www.powershaver.com/Products/Capacitors.aspx

Nothing more than power factor correction... which most utilities don't
charge residential customers for anyhow...

Power factor correction, for odd load scenarios in very specific
circumstances... can and does save industry a few bucks. Many times,
even in factories full of motors using thousands of kW of electricity,
the cost isn't worth it. Utilities do PF correction on occasion to
compensate for uneven system loading.. to save their own necks... but it
costs them a ton of money.

Unless someone has an awfully large home chock full of motors that will
produce back-EMF... and this thing only costs $25 bucks... maybe.
Otherwise... to use the term aptly applied here in a number of
instances... "I call B.S."...

If I have time, I'll try and call these people just for fun. I'd like
them to explain their 'magic' to someone who knows what they are talking
about (me, of course)....

Jake



Posted by Chris on June 20, 2007, 6:32 am

> Does anyone have any experience with one of these duct mounted devices.
The
> Fresh Air model by Quest International was originally developed as a Free
> Standing Unit, and the independent research of this device actually showed
> high levels of Ozone production (.05 ppm). The one I am questioning about
> is the duct mounted model called the Ductworx or something like that. It
is
> supposed to be mounted in the supply plenum, and only produces negligible
> amounts of O3.
>
> I still believe that the Sanuvox R1500-4000 is the best residential UV
> system on the market. What I liked about this other device is that it
> supposedly disperses products that actually clean objects in the
conditioned
> air, downstream duct work and insulation, rather than what just enters the
> return plenum.

BOllocks, HAVE ONE CUSTOME BUILT TO YOUR NEEDS.

>
> I have read the Kansas State tests and believe this claim of theirs, but I
> can find no conclusive evidence of this duct mounted device producing or
not
> producing toxic levels of Ozone. I have seen and believe the other
testing
> of their free standing device does produce too much ozone.

oZONE ISN'T GOOD FOR YOU
>
> I have spent the last two days researching this and cannot find anything.
> Does anyone else have anything to contribute to this. PLEASE NO SALES
> RHETORIC.
>
> They claim to use a UVX spectrum of UV light. There is no such spectrum.
> It is a luminescence tester, or a Homogenized Radiation System operating
in
> the 360 - 380 nm, that is all I could find out about other than some
vacuum
> cleaner claims to use it to sanitize floors ( more BS I am sure)

BY UV-X THEY ARE REFEERIGN TO A SPECTRUM OR MIX OR RANGES (I THINK)

360-380 NM ALSO DEACTIVATES VIRUSES, BACTERIAL, MOLD, FUNGIA, ETC ALL LIGHT
OF ALL WAVELENGTHS DOES. JUST 253.4 - 254.9 IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE.

> I had the salesmen in my office the other day, and I like the product,
but
> do not want to install it if it is a high ozone producing device. They
are
> wholesaling for about $350. He was also pushing a device called the Power
> Shaver, it reduces energy consumption of any motor (not VS) in your home
and
> can be hooked up to your electrical panel and it will be effective at
> reducing the energy consumption of any motor in your home, i.e. blower
> motors, washing machines, fans. I have done no research on it yet, but
saw
> the demonstration and I'll be damned if it didn't drop consumption by
about
> 30%. It might be snake oil, I am not sure yet.
>
> By the way, what I have discovered (or rather reconfirmed) is that all UV
> stick lights are ONLY effective at object cleaning, do not air purify, and
> they ALL are pretty much the same. They do not increase efficiency, they
> reduce mold and bacteria growth on what ever they are in constant contact
> with. A filter keeps your friggin coil clean.

UV DOESN'T CLEAN. NEVER HAS, IT CAN BLEECH, DESTROY PROTIENS, INFACT ANY
ORGANIC MATERIAL IT TOUCHES , SUBJECT TO EXPOSURE AND DOSAGE. YOU NEED
FILTERS AND UV. UV IS LIGHT, NOTHIGN BUT LIGHT, (PHOTONS).
>
> Sanuvox by the way has a couple of really good pps' and videos about it's
> products in the contractor sections of their site, I recommend them to be
> viewed. http://sanuvox.com/video_presentations.htm
>

SANUVOX AND PHILIPS ARE RESPECTABLE COMPANIES.

> Bob Pietrangelo
> bobp3@comcast.net (home)
> bob@comfort-solution.biz (work)
> www.comfort-solution.biz
>
>
>
>
>
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Cox Radiant Heater September 21, 2006, 7:34 pm
adding radiant heat? November 14, 2006, 7:17 am
Radiant Heat Transfer April 24, 2008, 11:08 am
Curious Radiant Heating Problem August 26, 2006, 10:25 pm
Heat Pump for Radiant System December 9, 2007, 1:16 pm
Needing Answers for 1-Zone Radiant floor installation February 3, 2007, 1:31 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap