If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Don Ocean on January 23, 2009, 4:34 am
Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
>>>> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
>>>>> Hello gents,
>>>>> A few of you own TECH Method Books.
>>>>> We have set up a dedicated discussion forum atwww.hvacrforums.comfor
>>>>> those who have bought the books. Of course all the other forums have
>>>>> free access to all.
>>>>> There is a free copy of TMI up for grabs for the first person to
>>>>> convincingly solve any two of the remaining puzzles on the forums
>>>>> challenge section.
>>>>> http://www.hvacrforums.com
>>>> Isn't this called *SPAM*? Desist.
>>> Something you might be worried about if this was not a discussion
>>> forum thriving with great discussions of substance. If it were you
>>> would be too busy discussing stuff.
>>> I'm not attacking you, just thinking aloud here.
>> Marc, even if you are sober, Spam is not really welcome here as you
>> well know.
>>> I would love to be able to rely on this place again for meaningful
>>> discussions like I did back in the 90's if only a few things would
>>> change though... like...
>> You were slammed by Paul and many others for spamming then also. We gave
>> you some Leeway as you were drunk most of the time and were in the
>> middle of a divorce and losing your daughter. I am amazed that in that
>> alcoholic haze that you got anything of value from this NG.
>
> I don't recall being slammed by Paul, perhaps pull up the thread?
>
> I recall messaging the fact that drop-in refrigerant manufacturers
> recommend not clearing the site glass because their drop-ins have
> greater capacity than the refrigerants they replace. Paul had some
> issue with this, which I can't properly remember except that he made
> the mistake of attacking me regarding the message.
>
> This is just something that Paul should have apologised for and
> nothing else. The issue had no bearing on me or the facts of the
> message I presented.
>
> You can read point 23 on the page linked to below for proof of the
> origins of my message which Paul mistakenly attacked me personally on.
> http://www.emersonclimate.com/contractor/support/faq/faq_CopelandTechnical.shtm
>
>>> 1) People, including me, discuss whatever we want provided that for at
>>> least 80% of the time we post on-topic substance.
>> Sorry to inform you, But Democracy prevails here. Rule making is not
>> your job.
>
> Indeed, the place is a democracy, no one can dispute that and so it is
> a pointless subject beyond the scope of my point, a red herring. It is
> the abhorrence of the ethics and etiquette I'm speaking of.
>
>>> 2) We all either ignore homeowners or we answer their questions in a
>>> way that offends no one but especially gives other members something
>>> to think about or for most of us to re-think about. Also, for
>>> instance, don't tell the homeowner to get a qualified tech
>> Thats what we do for a living and that is not your call. Steve usually
>> makes that statement as do others. Most of us are contractors and dig up
>> our own work. You usually work for others. If things are going so good
>> for you..Purchase a web forum and run your own Kingdom, where you can
>> make the rules at will.. Oh thats right//The Web has rules too. ;-/
>> - instead
>>> tell what might need checking, but, start off by saying something like
>>> "Your tech will have to check the following... " This does not amount
>>> to free advice
>> This is a liability factor. Misunderstood directions can get someone
>> hurt or dead, thus bring about a lawsuit. One internet lawsuit was just
>> settled for $2.3 Mil.. It was for $40 Mil.
>
> There's no liability in following precisely the suggestion I gave. No
> liability whatsoever.
I suggest you speak to your liability carrier about this. Many of us
have a cover letter from ours. Mine is "Zurich" out of Illinois. I note
the Bullshit has not diminished from your sector. I also note that you
do not seem to reside in the same location very long.
show/hide quoted text
>
>> - this in fact helps the homeowner better understand
>>> the work his tech will have to do and the knowledge he will have to
>>> have and so the homeowner would also better appreciate the efforts of
>>> the tech and the tech the owner for showing an interest.
>> Using such logic, that means you have to be as well versed as your
>> cardiologist or brain surgeons. Our job is not to train howeownersw in
>> our field. Its a stretch just training apprentices correctly. I have to
>> carry a few $Million in insurance to cover just that. I have no
>> intention of taking on any other liability that is unnecessary.
>
> Don, everyone knows that there used to be some very good discussions
> between us on the back of homeowner posts. Often the homeowner
> benefited none at all but we did get to share some great ideas and
> knowledge between ourselves.
>
>> Marc, When sober and on track you can bring some decent HVAC debate to
>> this forum. That is not to say Homeowners and others are to be targeted
>> for Technical subjects. For that, I am sure you will be very welcome in
>> their NG's.
>
> Funny how I am so often told that my debates and contributions are
> sorely missed.
I understand drugs and booze can give you those illusions.
You appear to be the minority.
Name your majority.. Also let me know when Ceasar Marc changed our
internet courtesy rules.
It's possible that
show/hide quoted text
> amongst those who don't say either way there may be a majority who
> agree with you. But whichever it is I am sure you will easily see that
> the point again is irrelevant.
If you run some stats, you will find that many have abandoned this NG
when you went on drunken posting binges. All I slammed was your Spam and
I still do.
This group is nothing like it used to
show/hide quoted text
> be and yet there are more people on the web than the 90's. This fact
> has nothing to do with me so you should stop being distracted and look
> elsewhere. If you are so sure that my points are also irrelevant then
> look elsewhere even further.
You are correct.. We octaspieled most spammers. You and the asshole that
was selling thermostats seem to keep returning from time to time. And he
like you drags the Homeowner NG postings with him. I thought that from
time to time you did post something of significance, but obviously that
was a precursor of your trying to sell us somthing. The only reason you
are here now is to sell books, and draw people to your webpage forum to
make money on the links. I note that you have a information Harvester on
that web page for anyone that clicks to it. Kasperski also indicates
that it should be blocked..Wanna tell us what that is.
Have a nice day Marc. ;-p
|
|
Posted by Marc O'Brien - ACRTC on January 23, 2009, 10:06 pm
show/hide quoted text
> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
> > If the webpage harvests anything then you would need to ask vBulletin
> > what that might be. The site runs with cookies and other than that
> > does nothing different from any other site. Seems once again your
> > ignorance is not seen by you as a weekness of your own - it seems once
> > again you are so ignorant you again fail to question that you even
> > might be ignorant.
> You sure do use a lot of redundancies. Is that loss of verbal skills due
> to drugs? =A0;-p- Hide quoted text -
Well, once again, there may or may not be an amount of tautological
practice. The point however stands on its own merit, a merit that does
not depend on the level of tautologies.
If you asked me the time and I said "7am" would you then tell the
person next to me they were wrong a second before when they said the
time was "7am in the morning"? The fact that the statement "7am in the
morning" has a redundant component, does not exclude any part of the
statements truth value. In fact the redundancy reaffirms or reinforces
the truth value. If you wanted to argue that the statement "7am in the
morning" was incorrect then it would take a lot more than merely
pointing out that it contains a redundant component. Again, to state
it has a redundant component is to merely change the subject to an off
topic irrelevance - another clear demonstration of ADD.
|
|
Posted by Don Ocean on January 24, 2009, 4:07 am
Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
>>> If the webpage harvests anything then you would need to ask vBulletin
>>> what that might be. The site runs with cookies and other than that
>>> does nothing different from any other site. Seems once again your
>>> ignorance is not seen by you as a weekness of your own - it seems once
>>> again you are so ignorant you again fail to question that you even
>>> might be ignorant.
>> You sure do use a lot of redundancies. Is that loss of verbal skills due
>> to drugs? ;-p- Hide quoted text -
>
> Well, once again, there may or may not be an amount of tautological
> practice. The point however stands on its own merit, a merit that does
> not depend on the level of tautologies.
>
> If you asked me the time and I said "7am" would you then tell the
> person next to me they were wrong a second before when they said the
> time was "7am in the morning"? The fact that the statement "7am in the
> morning" has a redundant component, does not exclude any part of the
> statements truth value. In fact the redundancy reaffirms or reinforces
> the truth value. If you wanted to argue that the statement "7am in the
> morning" was incorrect then it would take a lot more than merely
> pointing out that it contains a redundant component. Again, to state
> it has a redundant component is to merely change the subject to an off
> topic irrelevance - another clear demonstration of ADD.
Yawn... I see the only massively interest shown in your garbage is
Mikey. He and you are the reasons many of our real experts have
abandoned this NG. You dry out every several months and then decide you
are Queen of the Ball. Which fits nicely with the other fool "King".
Whatta pair of goofballs... ;-p You have noted the massive drop in
posting since you and the King decided to dump garbage here. Do it in
the Homeowner groups. They are not very up to date on your BS and will
swallow much of it as gospel.
|
|
Posted by Don Ocean on January 24, 2009, 4:07 am
Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
>>> If the webpage harvests anything then you would need to ask vBulletin
>>> what that might be. The site runs with cookies and other than that
>>> does nothing different from any other site. Seems once again your
>>> ignorance is not seen by you as a weekness of your own - it seems once
>>> again you are so ignorant you again fail to question that you even
>>> might be ignorant.
>> You sure do use a lot of redundancies. Is that loss of verbal skills due
>> to drugs? ;-p- Hide quoted text -
>
> Well, once again, there may or may not be an amount of tautological
> practice. The point however stands on its own merit, a merit that does
> not depend on the level of tautologies.
>
> If you asked me the time and I said "7am" would you then tell the
> person next to me they were wrong a second before when they said the
> time was "7am in the morning"? The fact that the statement "7am in the
> morning" has a redundant component, does not exclude any part of the
> statements truth value. In fact the redundancy reaffirms or reinforces
> the truth value. If you wanted to argue that the statement "7am in the
> morning" was incorrect then it would take a lot more than merely
> pointing out that it contains a redundant component. Again, to state
> it has a redundant component is to merely change the subject to an off
> topic irrelevance - another clear demonstration of ADD.
|
|
Posted by .p.jm on February 22, 2009, 12:29 pm
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>I thought you were posing as the Queen of HVACforums? Did they kick your
>fat drunken ass out? Are you behind on Child support again? Is that why
>you are frantically spamming in an effort to avoid Jail?
Hey I did I miss this post?
I'm the QUEEN here. This is MY forum!!!
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo now available online http://pmilligan.net/palm/
|
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Training... | January 15, 2008, 10:11 am |
| Re: AC & R Training & Consulting | January 2, 2009, 10:40 pm |
| Re: AC & R Training & Consulting | January 8, 2009, 6:35 pm |
| One Day Humidity Training Seminar | May 20, 2008, 12:04 pm |
| Important safety training video | July 20, 2006, 7:06 pm |
| Looking for modified bin method data | October 24, 2006, 10:06 am |
| Decommision HP - Turtle's "Self Suck" Method | February 15, 2007, 2:01 pm |
| What method do you all use to lubricate blower wheel motors? | April 17, 2008, 11:53 am |
| Re: Big Boy tech tip | July 12, 2008, 11:45 am |
| DDC Tech position | August 8, 2006, 12:50 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>>>> Marc O'Brien - ACRTC wrote:
>>>>> Hello gents,
>>>>> A few of you own TECH Method Books.
>>>>> We have set up a dedicated discussion forum atwww.hvacrforums.comfor
>>>>> those who have bought the books. Of course all the other forums have
>>>>> free access to all.
>>>>> There is a free copy of TMI up for grabs for the first person to
>>>>> convincingly solve any two of the remaining puzzles on the forums
>>>>> challenge section.
>>>>> http://www.hvacrforums.com
>>>> Isn't this called *SPAM*? Desist.
>>> Something you might be worried about if this was not a discussion
>>> forum thriving with great discussions of substance. If it were you
>>> would be too busy discussing stuff.
>>> I'm not attacking you, just thinking aloud here.
>> Marc, even if you are sober, Spam is not really welcome here as you
>> well know.
>>> I would love to be able to rely on this place again for meaningful
>>> discussions like I did back in the 90's if only a few things would
>>> change though... like...
>> You were slammed by Paul and many others for spamming then also. We gave
>> you some Leeway as you were drunk most of the time and were in the
>> middle of a divorce and losing your daughter. I am amazed that in that
>> alcoholic haze that you got anything of value from this NG.
>
> I don't recall being slammed by Paul, perhaps pull up the thread?
>
> I recall messaging the fact that drop-in refrigerant manufacturers
> recommend not clearing the site glass because their drop-ins have
> greater capacity than the refrigerants they replace. Paul had some
> issue with this, which I can't properly remember except that he made
> the mistake of attacking me regarding the message.
>
> This is just something that Paul should have apologised for and
> nothing else. The issue had no bearing on me or the facts of the
> message I presented.
>
> You can read point 23 on the page linked to below for proof of the
> origins of my message which Paul mistakenly attacked me personally on.
> http://www.emersonclimate.com/contractor/support/faq/faq_CopelandTechnical.shtm
>
>>> 1) People, including me, discuss whatever we want provided that for at
>>> least 80% of the time we post on-topic substance.
>> Sorry to inform you, But Democracy prevails here. Rule making is not
>> your job.
>
> Indeed, the place is a democracy, no one can dispute that and so it is
> a pointless subject beyond the scope of my point, a red herring. It is
> the abhorrence of the ethics and etiquette I'm speaking of.
>
>>> 2) We all either ignore homeowners or we answer their questions in a
>>> way that offends no one but especially gives other members something
>>> to think about or for most of us to re-think about. Also, for
>>> instance, don't tell the homeowner to get a qualified tech
>> Thats what we do for a living and that is not your call. Steve usually
>> makes that statement as do others. Most of us are contractors and dig up
>> our own work. You usually work for others. If things are going so good
>> for you..Purchase a web forum and run your own Kingdom, where you can
>> make the rules at will.. Oh thats right//The Web has rules too. ;-/
>> - instead
>>> tell what might need checking, but, start off by saying something like
>>> "Your tech will have to check the following... " This does not amount
>>> to free advice
>> This is a liability factor. Misunderstood directions can get someone
>> hurt or dead, thus bring about a lawsuit. One internet lawsuit was just
>> settled for $2.3 Mil.. It was for $40 Mil.
>
> There's no liability in following precisely the suggestion I gave. No
> liability whatsoever.