|
Posted by Zyp on November 8, 2007, 4:11 pm
.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:35:32 +0000 (UTC), davem@cs.ubc.ca (Dave
> Martindale) wrote:
>
>>
>>> See, DC is a much more efficient powersource when use in close
>>> proximity of production.
>>
>> DC *at the voltage you happen to need* is more efficient than AC,
>> because there are no transformer losses. But if the voltages don't
>> match, it's much more complicated and expensive to change voltage
>> with DC.
>>
>>> Unfortunately the DC supply to a power grid in an urban area would
>>> require huge quantities of copper to transmit.
>>> Now if they'd just have used more localized transformers &
>>> generation, we'd all be saving energy.
>>
>> There are probably only a few houses sharing the same pole
>> transformer (and thus the same 120/240 V supply). All other
>> distribution is done at higher voltage. To get the same efficiency
>> (both electric and copper usage) with DC, you'd need a source for
>> every few houses. But generators that small aren't very clean or
>> efficient.
>>
>> Centralized generation and AC distribution, using several levels of
>> voltage, makes much more sense for supplying homes.
>
> Damn. You mean, the power companies actually know WTF they're
> doing ? Better even than the home-moaners they supply unlimited power
> to 24 / 7 ????
>
> Shit ......
>
>
>
>>
>> DC is sometimes used to transmit large amount of power long
>> distances.
>>
>> Dave
>
> --
> Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
> http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
>
> Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
> 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
> 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
> HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
> Free demo now available online http://pmilligan.net/palm/
Where's that popcorn bucket?
--
Zyp
|