|
Posted by Geoman on May 21, 2007, 3:27 pm
>
>> > Your missing the point, Bill
>> No. You posted the "Great Debate" and thought McGuirk did so well.
>> Sharpton kicked his ass.
>>
>> > I can't remember a time where a white guy got on national TV and told
>> > the
>> > world exactly what Sharpton and Jackson do, MAKE MONEY ON DIVISION!
>> Hannity, O'Rielly, Straka etc. But how about you post exactly how
>> Sharpton has made money doing what you allege. Post your proof.
>> Lets see if you have the brains to see past what has been spoon fed you.
>>
>>
>> > He showed exactly what Sharpton is, and opportunist. I don't care if
>> > you like
>> > it or not, this was never done before, a non-black saying that they are
>> > opportunits and they think that they have special preferences.
>> He didn't show anything. He made accusations. What about Michelle
>> Malkin? How many examples do you need? I listed four so far and there
>> are plenty more.
>>
>> > Everyone is
>> > slammed on radio but you and Sharpton think blacks are off limits. I
>> You don't know what I think. You can't make a point without getting off
>> on a tangent or outright ignoring the point. Rush your only source of
>> information?
>>
>> f blacks
>> > want to be off limits then everyone and every race etc should be.
>> Ok so what was off limits in this Imus thing?
>>
>> > I'm not condoning what Imus said, so don't change the subject. My post
>> > was
>> > about history being made when a non-black said exactly what the
>> > majority of
>> > the non-blacks think. AND, the recongnition that Sharpton isn't as
>> > clean as
>> > he wants people to beleive his is, in other words, he's a hypocrite.
>>
>> You didn't say that. You were all hot and sweaty McGuirk verbally
>> slammed Sharpton. No history was made. It's been said before. Google is
>> your friend. Look up all the prior examples you want. I listed four
>> sources.
>>
>> So in your mind it wasn't about any debate. It's about who gets the best
>> name calling shot in.
>> You foam at the mouth at the mere mention of anything contrary to what
>> you believe. You sure as hell aren't gonna let some dumb facts get in
>> the way.
>> How about this Rich, let's say: Imus called your kid a "rat faced ho" on
>> national radio because they saw your kids picture in the wedding
>> section. Sharpton stepped up and said that isn't acceptable and it's
>> time it stopped. McGuirk says they have a history of calling people
>> names and Imus apologized for calling your kid names but they've done it
>> in the past and so now what is the big deal and that
OK< then Sharpton is FAIR GAME,
He called many others insulting words but you and others turn the other way.
Also, if someone said that about my daughter it just MAY be true! I know a
LOT of UGLY VERY UGLY women!!!
Saying however hurts, but it doesn't mean its not the truth. The same is
about Imus, what he said is the truth, those 'ho's are butt ugly. I as a
father would sue but I wouldn't ask Billy Grahm to to start a boycott
because my daughters were butt ugly!
BTW, here is another interesting video. Sharpton denied things with Hannity
but Sean had the facts and proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Q95ldhsEQ&mode=related&search=
> the point is...
>
>> Sharpton is a race baiting opportunist etc etc.
>
> and someone said it publicly. Imus was wrong but how many times does
> Sharton get to get away with his shake down of
> individuals or coporations???
>
> Joseph
>
>
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap