What's bad about flex duct? - Page 3

> wrote:
>
>>>>> And the total noise is reduced by about 1dBC.
>>>> Oh ! dbC, now, is it ? Aren't we the fine ones ? Too proud
>>>> to use the old dbA weight, are we ? :-)
>> Pride has nothing to do with it. People who read, thought about and
>> understood
>> the problem statement would probably understand that the A-curve
>> significantly suppresses the low frequencies where the problem lies.
>> If I had A-weighted ears, I wouldn't have a problem.
>> But, just for you, I put up a webpage:
>> http://spamme0.netii.net/Noise.html
>
> "You see this page, because the system administrator of 000webhost.com
> is currently checking this website for malicious content. This
> redirect will be removed once we will finish manually checking all
> files on this account."
>
>         Who the fuck hosts your website, the UN's HRC ? Perhaps
> Canada's version of same ?
>
>> There are spectral plots of the noise and even an mp3 of the sound.
>> You can analyze it with any weighting you choose.
>> Hope the link works. Given the amount of animosity in the group,
>> I didn't want to expose my real isp web address.
>
>         I see you missed the signifigance of the Monty Python HTML
> tags ..... why am I not suprised ?
>
>
>>> Hmmmm, didn't I suggest almost exactly the same thing, in the original
>>> thread?
>>> Angle iron, eh??????
>>> Didn't I say that a "duct" thick enough and heavy enough would guarantee
>>> quiet?
>
>         If yuo did, then you are a fool, and wrong again.
>
>
>

> .p.jm.@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>>>> And the total noise is reduced by about 1dBC.
>>>>> Oh ! dbC, now, is it ? Aren't we the fine ones ? Too proud
>>>>> to use the old dbA weight, are we ? :-)
>>> Pride has nothing to do with it. People who read, thought about and
>>> understood
>>> the problem statement would probably understand that the A-curve
>>> significantly suppresses the low frequencies where the problem lies.
>>> If I had A-weighted ears, I wouldn't have a problem.
>>> But, just for you, I put up a webpage:
>>> http://spamme0.netii.net/Noise.html
>> "You see this page, because the system administrator of 000webhost.com
>> is currently checking this website for malicious content. This
>> redirect will be removed once we will finish manually checking all
>> files on this account."
>> Who the fuck hosts your website, the UN's HRC ? Perhaps
>> Canada's version of same ?
>>> There are spectral plots of the noise and even an mp3 of the sound.
>>> You can analyze it with any weighting you choose.
>>> Hope the link works. Given the amount of animosity in the group,
>>> I didn't want to expose my real isp web address.
>> I see you missed the signifigance of the Monty Python HTML
>> tags ..... why am I not suprised ?
>>>> Hmmmm, didn't I suggest almost exactly the same thing, in the original
>>>> thread?
>>>> Angle iron, eh??????
>>>> Didn't I say that a "duct" thick enough and heavy enough would
>>>> guarantee quiet?
>> If yuo did, then you are a fool, and wrong again.
> OK, try this one
> http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/Noise.html
> throwaway websites are not always reliable.
> mike

>> .p.jm.@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> And the total noise is reduced by about 1dBC.
>>>>>> Oh ! dbC, now, is it ? Aren't we the fine ones ? Too proud
>>>>>> to use the old dbA weight, are we ? :-)
>>>> Pride has nothing to do with it. People who read, thought about and
>>>> understood
>>>> the problem statement would probably understand that the A-curve
>>>> significantly suppresses the low frequencies where the problem lies.
>>>> If I had A-weighted ears, I wouldn't have a problem.
>>>> But, just for you, I put up a webpage:
>>>> http://spamme0.netii.net/Noise.html
>>> "You see this page, because the system administrator of 000webhost.com
>>> is currently checking this website for malicious content. This
>>> redirect will be removed once we will finish manually checking all
>>> files on this account."
>>> Who the fuck hosts your website, the UN's HRC ? Perhaps
>>> Canada's version of same ?
>>>> There are spectral plots of the noise and even an mp3 of the sound.
>>>> You can analyze it with any weighting you choose.
>>>> Hope the link works. Given the amount of animosity in the group,
>>>> I didn't want to expose my real isp web address.
>>> I see you missed the signifigance of the Monty Python HTML
>>> tags ..... why am I not suprised ?
>>>>> Hmmmm, didn't I suggest almost exactly the same thing, in the original
>>>>> thread?
>>>>> Angle iron, eh??????
>>>>> Didn't I say that a "duct" thick enough and heavy enough would
>>>>> guarantee quiet?
>>> If yuo did, then you are a fool, and wrong again.
>> OK, try this one
>> http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/Noise.html
>> throwaway websites are not always reliable.
>> mike
>
> Yup... air noise because of undersized RA ductwork because it wasn't done
> right to begin with. The blower noise is being transmitted through the duct
> and also the joists that the furnace is sitting on.
>
> Correct the ductwork issues like I told you, isolate the furnace so its not
> sitting on the joists(either hang it, or use isolation pads), and in
> addition, add a vibration isolation boot between the new RA duct and the
> furnace.
>
> No its not gonna be free. your can either correct it as I told you or you
> can live with it.... there is no bandaid.
>
>

> Steve wrote:
>>> .p.jm.@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> And the total noise is reduced by about 1dBC.
>>>>>>> Oh ! dbC, now, is it ? Aren't we the fine ones ? Too proud
>>>>>>> to use the old dbA weight, are we ? :-)
>>>>> Pride has nothing to do with it. People who read, thought about and
>>>>> understood
>>>>> the problem statement would probably understand that the A-curve
>>>>> significantly suppresses the low frequencies where the problem lies.
>>>>> If I had A-weighted ears, I wouldn't have a problem.
>>>>> But, just for you, I put up a webpage:
>>>>> http://spamme0.netii.net/Noise.html
>>>> "You see this page, because the system administrator of 000webhost.com
>>>> is currently checking this website for malicious content. This
>>>> redirect will be removed once we will finish manually checking all
>>>> files on this account."
>>>> Who the fuck hosts your website, the UN's HRC ? Perhaps
>>>> Canada's version of same ?
>>>>> There are spectral plots of the noise and even an mp3 of the sound.
>>>>> You can analyze it with any weighting you choose.
>>>>> Hope the link works. Given the amount of animosity in the group,
>>>>> I didn't want to expose my real isp web address.
>>>> I see you missed the signifigance of the Monty Python HTML
>>>> tags ..... why am I not suprised ?
>>>>>> Hmmmm, didn't I suggest almost exactly the same thing, in the
>>>>>> original thread?
>>>>>> Angle iron, eh??????
>>>>>> Didn't I say that a "duct" thick enough and heavy enough would
>>>>>> guarantee quiet?
>>>> If yuo did, then you are a fool, and wrong again.
>>> OK, try this one
>>> http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/Noise.html
>>> throwaway websites are not always reliable.
>>> mike
>> Yup... air noise because of undersized RA ductwork because it wasn't done
>> right to begin with. The blower noise is being transmitted through the
>> duct and also the joists that the furnace is sitting on.
>> Correct the ductwork issues like I told you, isolate the furnace so its
>> not sitting on the joists(either hang it, or use isolation pads), and in
>> addition, add a vibration isolation boot between the new RA duct and the
>> furnace.
>> No its not gonna be free. your can either correct it as I told you or you
>> can live with it.... there is no bandaid.
> Hi,
> I wonder what the noise level is in db measured with sound(noise) level
> meter???? Is the reading in danger zone to damage hearing for long term
> exposure?

>> .p.jm.@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> And the total noise is reduced by about 1dBC.
>>>>>> Oh ! dbC, now, is it ? Aren't we the fine ones ? Too proud
>>>>>> to use the old dbA weight, are we ? :-)
>>>> Pride has nothing to do with it. People who read, thought about and
>>>> understood
>>>> the problem statement would probably understand that the A-curve
>>>> significantly suppresses the low frequencies where the problem lies.
>>>> If I had A-weighted ears, I wouldn't have a problem.
>>>> But, just for you, I put up a webpage:
>>>> http://spamme0.netii.net/Noise.html
>>> "You see this page, because the system administrator of 000webhost.com
>>> is currently checking this website for malicious content. This
>>> redirect will be removed once we will finish manually checking all
>>> files on this account."
>>> Who the fuck hosts your website, the UN's HRC ? Perhaps
>>> Canada's version of same ?
>>>> There are spectral plots of the noise and even an mp3 of the sound.
>>>> You can analyze it with any weighting you choose.
>>>> Hope the link works. Given the amount of animosity in the group,
>>>> I didn't want to expose my real isp web address.
>>> I see you missed the signifigance of the Monty Python HTML
>>> tags ..... why am I not suprised ?
>>>>> Hmmmm, didn't I suggest almost exactly the same thing, in the original
>>>>> thread?
>>>>> Angle iron, eh??????
>>>>> Didn't I say that a "duct" thick enough and heavy enough would
>>>>> guarantee quiet?
>>> If yuo did, then you are a fool, and wrong again.
>> OK, try this one
>> http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/Noise.html
>> throwaway websites are not always reliable.
>> mike
>
> Yup... air noise because of undersized RA ductwork because it wasn't done
> right to begin with. The blower noise is being transmitted through the duct
> and also the joists that the furnace is sitting on.
>
> Correct the ductwork issues like I told you, isolate the furnace so its not
> sitting on the joists(either hang it, or use isolation pads), and in
> addition, add a vibration isolation boot between the new RA duct and the
> furnace.
>
> No its not gonna be free. your can either correct it as I told you or you
> can live with it.... there is no bandaid.
>
>