Home Page link

toyota vs GM wage - Page 2

HVAC Discussions - Heating, ventilation and air conditioning. 

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
toyota vs GM wage The King 12-12-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by on December 12, 2008, 10:26 pm
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:01:02 -0500, The King <The
King@homeonthethrone.edu> wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:25:04 -0500, .p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com
>wrote:
>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:53:26 -0500, The King <The
>>King@homeonthethrone.edu> wrote:
>>>Looks like Toyota assy is a high pay and pork full, They just don't
>>>have the legacy costs yet. When they do, poof they be gone.
>>        They won't HAVE those costs, because they are not caught up in
>>a 40 - 50 year cycle of making far-distant promises to avaricious
>>unions.
>In effect they are free to flee at a moments notice if they want.

        Yep. Just like any other employer.

>Which they will when the time comes. Just like GM does here,
>announce a closing and poof they be gone.

        Yes, they can make whatever business decisions they choose.
Working at a company is not a guarantee that they will still be
employing you there 5 - 10 - 40 years later. This is called 'the real
world'.

>Personally I wouldn't want to work under that crap threat everyday.

        Then you can ONLY work for a union, and an unusually strong
one like UAW. There is NO OTHER COMPANY where you have a gaurantee
like that.

        Then again - watcha gonna do when your famed UAW company files
bankruptcy, and the government decides NOT to bail them out this
time ?

>I've had guys in the shops tell me they would like my job because of
>the travel, I wouldn't like there's because of the lack of travel.
>>        They are paying good VERY GOOD competitive wages and benefits
>>( otherwise they would be unable to hire anyone ), not 'promising the
>>moon and the stars'.
>Well I've always said while walking through any UAW plant that its no
>wonder they are loosing there asses. So much waste.

        IBM used to be like that 30 years ago. I remember walking
into a room and seeing HUGE wall of shelves PACKED with the latest
'hot gear' from Texas Instruments, etc etc - top of the line scopes,
etc. All tagged 'salvage'. I asked why. I was told 'They're last
year's model, this year's model has an extra button or feature, so we
replaced them and we're throwing them out.' There had to have been .
$ 1,000,000 of < 1 year old high-end test equipment on those shelves.
To be GROUND UP AND COMPACTED, not SOLD. Company policy.

        IBM USED to be 'The Holy Grail' of the computer world - get
'in', you had a job for life. Look where it got them.


>Basically its like that for me in the UA, I don't get any stars (well
>except for my UA star ranking) and if I don't work I don't eat. I
>make a good wage with health care as long as I work. No paid days off,
>no personal days no paid vacation.

        Then obviously you don't work for the UAW.

>Nobody is promising anything these days. Those days are long gone.

        Not for 'legacy' UAW workers. Read that contract you pointed
to.

>Is the UAW the only reason you oppose the loan?

        Not at all. Bad management, total lack of foresight ( where
are the cars of the future we should be driving today ? The 50 - 60 +
MPG cars ? The all-electrics? ), the advertising ( creating the
'mystique' of the SUV ) etc etc. Horrible business model from top to
bottom. And they have NEVER truly changed it. And I suspect they
never will.


>>        So - they are EXCELLENT jobs to get, and yet the company can
>>make a good solid profit from them every year, indefinitily. Sounds
>>like a win-win plan to me !
>Yup me too. That's why I don't understand the opposition to a loan.

        You confuse the facts - I was referring to the NON Big Three
companies, the ones making money, the ones NOT asking for the
taxpayers to absorb the result of their failures.


--
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

Posted by Bipolar Bear on December 12, 2008, 10:41 pm

> >Is the UAW the only reason you oppose the loan?
> Not at all. Bad management, total lack of foresight ( where
> are the cars of the future we should be driving today ? The 50 - 60 +
> MPG cars ? The all-electrics? ), the advertising ( creating the
> 'mystique' of the SUV ) etc etc. Horrible business model from top to
> bottom. And they have NEVER truly changed it. And I suspect they
> never will.

http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/int/hummer

"Dear Senator [insert your Senator's name here]
I live and work in [insert your state], care about the environment and who
gets tax breaks and why. I believe it is right for farmers and other
business people who truly need pick-ups and vans weighing over 6000 pounds
to deduct their vehicles as a business expense. But it is not right to
provide this same deduction to lawyers, doctors or accountants who drive
huge SUVs, hauling little more than a brief case or maybe their kids to a
ball game. Now President Bush wants to increase the tax break for vehicles
of this size, allowing small businesses to deduct the entire price, and
costing the government still more in lost revenues."

--



Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: toyota vs GM wage December 12, 2008, 10:24 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap