Home Page link

toyota vs GM wage - Page 2

HVAC Discussions - Heating, ventilation and air conditioning. 

Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
toyota vs GM wage The King 12-12-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by .p.jm on December 12, 2008, 10:26 pm
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:01:02 -0500, The King <The
show/hide quoted text
        Yep. Just like any other employer.
show/hide quoted text
        Yes, they can make whatever business decisions they choose.
Working at a company is not a guarantee that they will still be
employing you there 5 - 10 - 40 years later. This is called 'the real
world'.
show/hide quoted text
        Then you can ONLY work for a union, and an unusually strong
one like UAW. There is NO OTHER COMPANY where you have a gaurantee
like that.
        Then again - watcha gonna do when your famed UAW company files
bankruptcy, and the government decides NOT to bail them out this
time ?
show/hide quoted text
        IBM used to be like that 30 years ago. I remember walking
into a room and seeing HUGE wall of shelves PACKED with the latest
'hot gear' from Texas Instruments, etc etc - top of the line scopes,
etc. All tagged 'salvage'. I asked why. I was told 'They're last
year's model, this year's model has an extra button or feature, so we
replaced them and we're throwing them out.' There had to have been .
$ 1,000,000 of < 1 year old high-end test equipment on those shelves.
To be GROUND UP AND COMPACTED, not SOLD. Company policy.
        IBM USED to be 'The Holy Grail' of the computer world - get
'in', you had a job for life. Look where it got them.
show/hide quoted text
        Then obviously you don't work for the UAW.
show/hide quoted text
        Not for 'legacy' UAW workers. Read that contract you pointed
to.
show/hide quoted text
        Not at all. Bad management, total lack of foresight ( where
are the cars of the future we should be driving today ? The 50 - 60 +
MPG cars ? The all-electrics? ), the advertising ( creating the
'mystique' of the SUV ) etc etc. Horrible business model from top to
bottom. And they have NEVER truly changed it. And I suspect they
never will.
show/hide quoted text
        You confuse the facts - I was referring to the NON Big Three
companies, the ones making money, the ones NOT asking for the
taxpayers to absorb the result of their failures.
--
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm
Posted by Bipolar Bear on December 12, 2008, 10:41 pm
show/hide quoted text
http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/int/hummer
"Dear Senator [insert your Senator's name here]
I live and work in [insert your state], care about the environment and who
gets tax breaks and why. I believe it is right for farmers and other
business people who truly need pick-ups and vans weighing over 6000 pounds
to deduct their vehicles as a business expense. But it is not right to
provide this same deduction to lawyers, doctors or accountants who drive
huge SUVs, hauling little more than a brief case or maybe their kids to a
ball game. Now President Bush wants to increase the tax break for vehicles
of this size, allowing small businesses to deduct the entire price, and
costing the government still more in lost revenues."
Page 2 of 2       << first < 1 2
Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: toyota vs GM wage December 12, 2008, 10:24 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap