If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by terry on October 27, 2009, 2:04 am
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:47:00 -0400, Existential Angst wrote:
> >> By the way, I'm glad you expressed your appreciation of this antiquate=
> >> wiring, which is often in much better condition than people give it cr=
edit
show/hide quoted text
> >> for.
> > Yeah, that wiring and the brass plumbing was a big part of the decision=
to
show/hide quoted text
> > buy.
> Sounds like we have similar wiring in our place (late 40s build) - the
> problem I've found is generally in the light fittings, where years of hea=
> from bulbs has slowly cooked things and it's all turned a bit brittle
> (fittings which take multiple bulbs being the worst). Cut further back
> and it's stood the test of time pretty well.
> > That and the incredible attic ladder -- I figgered anyone who took the
> > trouble to install *that* quality ladder in a g-d attic had to have don=
> > the rest of the house right. =A0I was mostly right. =A0:)
> Our place is interesting - it was all built by the old lady who used to
> own it, and it seems like she did a piece here and a piece there as and
> when she felt like it. Some of it's done extremely well, but then there
> are other bits where corners were obviously cut...
> > I once expressed the opinion that some significant percentage of
> > electrical fires *must* be due to wire nuts, because cross-sectional
> > area of electron flow is greatly reduced, even on a properly
> > twisted/nutted joint, while solder virtually completely eliminates this
> > conductive bottleneck.
> Y'know, I was amazed the first time I visited the US and discovered that
> typical wiring was held together with those things - I'd done plenty of
> wiring overseas and it was always with junction boxes / fittings that had
> proper insulated screw terminals inside. Using a wire nut would be a
> hanging offense ;-)
> > I was, however, sort of shouted down, but I still don't see wire nuts a=
> > anywhere near as effective or safe as soldering.
> I've heard that soldered connections can melt if there's a serious
> overload - but by that point there are probably other things to be
> worrying about anyway. :-)
> cheers
> Jules
No problem with 'wire nuts' (i.e. wire connectors) since 1956 when I
arrived in North America. tree residences since then two of which we
built and wired ourselves. Like everything else if they are used
properly no problems at all. There are an estimated at least one
hundred or so in this typical all-electric house built in 1970 (some
inside the connection space of baseboard electric heaters) and we have
had no problems with overheating or bad connections on both lighting
circuits (15 amp maximum) or duplex outlets circuits (20 amp). And in
one case with a three wire heavier connection from the main panel to a
secondary (pony) one.
One UK style wiring item do not miss is those fiddly (silly) little
brass screws in so-called 'chocolate blocks' and/or certain lamp
holders' often made of brass, a soft metal! Easy to strip or mar the
small screw head (or drop one!); they require an additional small
'straight blade' screwdriver. Whereas much Canadian wiring can be done
with one #2 Robertson (square) screwdriver and a pair of pliers.
Ring main circuits while maybe a good idea are either very uncommon or
not used at all.
Having got used to it rather like the 115 - 0 - 115 volt single phase
domestic service. Although if/when encounters a 3 kilowatt electric
kettle it is till abit of a surprise how quilckly it boils. But how
much boiling water does one need to make one pot of tea anyway!
Including 'heating the pot'!
Also and not as one would suspect aerial service of both 13KV primary
lines and secondary 115/230 volt wires from pole mounted transformers
to homes results in very fast restore times. Our local utility company
line crews are excellent. Seen them change out a transformer in the
middle of a snow storm, at night, in a couple of hours from the time
the 'Power has gone off" telephone call had been made.
Yes 'tinned' copper wire is easier to solder; and sometimes used in
electronics and marine environments for that reason and to resist
corrosion.
|
|
Posted by Jules on October 27, 2009, 8:47 am
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:04:48 -0700, terry wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> No problem with 'wire nuts' (i.e. wire connectors) since 1956 when I
> arrived in North America. tree residences since then two of which we
> built and wired ourselves. Like everything else if they are used
> properly no problems at all. There are an estimated at least one
> hundred or so in this typical all-electric house built in 1970 (some
> inside the connection space of baseboard electric heaters) and we have
> had no problems with overheating or bad connections on both lighting
> circuits (15 amp maximum) or duplex outlets circuits (20 amp). And in
> one case with a three wire heavier connection from the main panel to a
> secondary (pony) one.
I've had a few in our place that have been bad, but then maybe they were
never fitted properly when first installed - some of the wiring in our
place is very good, but some of it's a bit of a mess :-)
show/hide quoted text
> One UK style wiring item do not miss is those fiddly (silly) little
> brass screws in so-called 'chocolate blocks' and/or certain lamp
> holders' often made of brass, a soft metal! Easy to strip or mar the
> small screw head (or drop one!); they require an additional small
> 'straight blade' screwdriver. Whereas much Canadian wiring can be done
> with one #2 Robertson (square) screwdriver and a pair of pliers.
Yeah, I hear ya there. The ones used in "proper" fittings are robust
enough (equivalent in strength to the terminals on US electrical outlets)
but cheap lamps etc. can still have those and they're just nasty.
show/hide quoted text
> Ring main circuits while maybe a good idea are either very uncommon or
> not used at all.
Seems so. Although it is more hassle to set up, and I'm never quite
convinced of the loading benefits given that the ring could fail yet still
appear to work; at least with a radial system if a connection goes bad
it's pretty obvious that it's done so.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_circuit for the curious)
show/hide quoted text
> Having got used to it rather like the 115 - 0 - 115 volt single phase
> domestic service. Although if/when encounters a 3 kilowatt electric
> kettle it is till abit of a surprise how quilckly it boils. But how much
> boiling water does one need to make one pot of tea anyway! Including
> 'heating the pot'!
:-) Not having 240V everywhere is one of those things that's taking some
getting used to for me. Plus I've got various 240V things I want to ship
over sometime, and it's going to be interesting planning all the
necessary wiring (most of it's stuff that can live in the 'shop or
basement, so thankfully I don't need to completely rewire the house or
anything!)
show/hide quoted text
> Also and not as one would suspect aerial service of both 13KV primary
> lines and secondary 115/230 volt wires from pole mounted transformers to
> homes results in very fast restore times. Our local utility company line
> crews are excellent. Seen them change out a transformer in the middle of
> a snow storm, at night, in a couple of hours from the time the 'Power
> has gone off" telephone call had been made.
I've not seen much of that here (yet) but I've certainly been impressed
with how few power cuts & brownouts we've had - everywhere else I've
been in the world cuts have been quite frequent and could easily last
a few hours.
cheers
Jules
|
|
Posted by Existential Angst on October 27, 2009, 3:38 pm
show/hide quoted text
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:04:48 -0700, terry wrote:
>> No problem with 'wire nuts' (i.e. wire connectors) since 1956 when I
>> arrived in North America. tree residences since then two of which we
>> built and wired ourselves. Like everything else if they are used
>> properly no problems at all. There are an estimated at least one
>> hundred or so in this typical all-electric house built in 1970 (some
>> inside the connection space of baseboard electric heaters) and we have
>> had no problems with overheating or bad connections on both lighting
>> circuits (15 amp maximum) or duplex outlets circuits (20 amp). And in
>> one case with a three wire heavier connection from the main panel to a
>> secondary (pony) one.
> I've had a few in our place that have been bad, but then maybe they were
> never fitted properly when first installed - some of the wiring in our
> place is very good, but some of it's a bit of a mess :-)
>> One UK style wiring item do not miss is those fiddly (silly) little
>> brass screws in so-called 'chocolate blocks' and/or certain lamp
>> holders' often made of brass, a soft metal! Easy to strip or mar the
>> small screw head (or drop one!); they require an additional small
>> 'straight blade' screwdriver. Whereas much Canadian wiring can be done
>> with one #2 Robertson (square) screwdriver and a pair of pliers.
> Yeah, I hear ya there. The ones used in "proper" fittings are robust
> enough (equivalent in strength to the terminals on US electrical outlets)
> but cheap lamps etc. can still have those and they're just nasty.
>> Ring main circuits while maybe a good idea are either very uncommon or
>> not used at all.
> Seems so. Although it is more hassle to set up, and I'm never quite
> convinced of the loading benefits given that the ring could fail yet still
> appear to work; at least with a radial system if a connection goes bad
> it's pretty obvious that it's done so.
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_circuit for the curious)
That was VERY inneresting!!!
Am I correct in observing that the diagram shows two "radial" connections to
the ring?
It took me a while to grok the "point" of the schematic, and when I did, it
left me with a very big Q:
How does a ring circuit SAVE copper? ?
Yeah, I can see how you can use thinner gauge wire, but now you have to use
twice as much of it!
Current capacity (density) is directly proportional to cross-sectional
area, so it seems to me this system is 6 of one, half a dozen of the other,
mass-wise in copper.
The article pointed out some potent disadvantages, as well -- somewhat
dicey, eh?
Interestingly, NYC still has DC running to some older commercial buildings!
And, NYC's 3 phase is 208, not 220 or 240 V, like most of the rest of the
country -- 208 is EXACTLY the rms voltage difference between two 120 V sine
waves 120 deg out of phase, making it, I think, the "purest" type of 3
phase.
Just across any city line, and yer up to 240 -- which bleeve me wreaks a lot
of havoc, machine-wise.
But, I thought Europe was all 220, ie, two hot legs, residentially??
I think 220-240V is a **much better** system than single hot leg 120, as it
is *inherently* balanced, and you don't have to worry about neutrals and
grounds as much -- precisely because of this balance. AND, with lower I^2R
losses, esp. when you consider that many grounds are really crappy, often
using steel cables instead of copper.
g-dAmerica never quite gets it right, unless it comes to fleecing their
public. Who needs a junta or a dictatorship when you have a Congress
blowing Wall Street, using the Media as a condom??
Altho amazingly our vitamins are a lot more available, fwiu. Whazzup wit
dat, over there???
--
show/hide quoted text
>> Having got used to it rather like the 115 - 0 - 115 volt single phase
>> domestic service. Although if/when encounters a 3 kilowatt electric
>> kettle it is till abit of a surprise how quilckly it boils. But how much
>> boiling water does one need to make one pot of tea anyway! Including
>> 'heating the pot'!
> :-) Not having 240V everywhere is one of those things that's taking some
> getting used to for me. Plus I've got various 240V things I want to ship
> over sometime, and it's going to be interesting planning all the
> necessary wiring (most of it's stuff that can live in the 'shop or
> basement, so thankfully I don't need to completely rewire the house or
> anything!)
>> Also and not as one would suspect aerial service of both 13KV primary
>> lines and secondary 115/230 volt wires from pole mounted transformers to
>> homes results in very fast restore times. Our local utility company line
>> crews are excellent. Seen them change out a transformer in the middle of
>> a snow storm, at night, in a couple of hours from the time the 'Power
>> has gone off" telephone call had been made.
> I've not seen much of that here (yet) but I've certainly been impressed
> with how few power cuts & brownouts we've had - everywhere else I've
> been in the world cuts have been quite frequent and could easily last
> a few hours.
> cheers
> Jules
>
|
|
Posted by gfretwell on October 27, 2009, 4:21 pm
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:38:12 -0400, "Existential Angst"
show/hide quoted text
>esp. when you consider that many grounds are really crappy, often
>using steel cables instead of copper.
Huh?
The neutral conductor in triplex is the same 1350 alloy of aluminum as
the phase conductors but it may be 2 sizes smaller assuming a fairly
large line/line load will be present.
|
|
Posted by Existential Angst on October 27, 2009, 5:38 pm
show/hide quoted text
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:38:12 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>>esp. when you consider that many grounds are really crappy, often
>>using steel cables instead of copper.
> Huh?
> The neutral conductor in triplex is the same 1350 alloy of aluminum as
> the phase conductors but it may be 2 sizes smaller assuming a fairly
> large line/line load will be present.
Here, the neutral AND ground wires in house cable are copper, but I was
talking about from the weatherhead of the house out to the pole -- the house
copper is attached to stranded steel support cable -- at least in my neck of
the woods in NY. And then, from the pole to whereever, I don't know what
the ground/neutral is, but I suspect it continues as the steel tension cable
for the other hot copper wires.
I've asked linemen, but these guys don't know -- I get a different answer
with each guy I ask.
--
EA
|
Page 3 of 13 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | How in the heck do I hang things in a 1920's building?!? | April 30, 2007, 3:16 pm |
| Wiring problems, and possibly unsafe old wiring | November 15, 2005, 1:40 pm |
| Wiring a Generator Independent of the house's wiring | April 17, 2006, 12:37 pm |
| Wiring ???? | July 13, 2005, 7:25 pm |
| Help with Wiring | January 17, 2006, 7:23 pm |
| Wiring | January 20, 2006, 1:01 pm |
| Spa wiring | May 19, 2007, 9:31 am |
| OLD WIRING | June 8, 2007, 10:28 am |
| wiring a outside hot tub | September 18, 2007, 9:23 am |
| Outside Wiring | February 12, 2008, 7:41 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> >> By the way, I'm glad you expressed your appreciation of this antiquate=
> >> wiring, which is often in much better condition than people give it cr=