Home Page link

Ball park cost for breaker box replacement

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 3 of 10       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Ball park cost for breaker box replacement Eigenvector 09-15-2006
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Chris Lewis on September 18, 2006, 12:26 pm
> As a customer, I would consider it unreasonable to get a phone
> estimate for one thing, then expect additional work for the same
> amount.

Me neither.

However, the question is what is that "one thing"?

You get an over the phone estimate for $50 to hang a new fixture.
The electrician arrives, and discovers that the support point
has rotted out, the wire's insulation is falling off and is half
melted, and it'll require routing a new circuit, with wall
teardown and fishing thru a muddy crawlspace.

"You said you'd do it for $50". Well, he can't, because that "one
thing" was a lot more work than anticipated.

Watch Mike Holmes sometime, and see how a "bit of water leaking
through a windowsill" can turn into a full roof tearoff, and
gutting several rooms.
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.

PexSupply Save 10 468x60
Posted by Mark Lloyd on September 18, 2006, 1:24 pm
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:26:49 -0000, clewis@nortelnetworks.com (Chris
Lewis) wrote:

>> As a customer, I would consider it unreasonable to get a phone
>> estimate for one thing, then expect additional work for the same
>> amount.
>
>Me neither.
>
>However, the question is what is that "one thing"?
>
>You get an over the phone estimate for $50 to hang a new fixture.
>The electrician arrives, and discovers that the support point
>has rotted out, the wire's insulation is falling off and is half
>melted, and it'll require routing a new circuit, with wall
>teardown and fishing thru a muddy crawlspace.
>
>"You said you'd do it for $50".

I would know that that $50 is an ESTIMATE (certainly not a guaranteed
amount) that couldn't possibly include unknowns.

> Well, he can't, because that "one
>thing" was a lot more work than anticipated.
>
>Watch Mike Holmes sometime, and see how a "bit of water leaking
>through a windowsill" can turn into a full roof tearoff, and
>gutting several rooms.
--
98 days until the winter solstice celebration

Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com

"God was invented by man for a reason, that
reason is no longer applicable."

Posted by Chris Lewis on September 18, 2006, 1:35 pm
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:26:49 -0000, clewis@nortelnetworks.com (Chris
> Lewis) wrote:

> >> As a customer, I would consider it unreasonable to get a phone
> >> estimate for one thing, then expect additional work for the same
> >> amount.

> >Me neither.

> >However, the question is what is that "one thing"?

> >You get an over the phone estimate for $50 to hang a new fixture.
> >The electrician arrives, and discovers that the support point
> >has rotted out, the wire's insulation is falling off and is half
> >melted, and it'll require routing a new circuit, with wall
> >teardown and fishing thru a muddy crawlspace.
> >
> >"You said you'd do it for $50".
>
> I would know that that $50 is an ESTIMATE (certainly not a guaranteed
> amount) that couldn't possibly include unknowns.

_You_ would, but not everyone is that reasonable.

Furthermore, that's not how the courts interpret "estimates", and
the trades are compelled to treat them the same way.

As guaranteed amounts. Think "car repair estimates" most jurisdictions
consider those to be _firm_ upper limits.

I'd also suggest that in renovations (rather than new construction),
"ballpark estimates" (where you tell the tradesperson UP FRONT that
you're only using the number for budgetary purposes, and would
get them to give you a more accurate estimate on inspection)
often vary so wildly as to be _useless_. Because of the infamous
"jackpot!" problem.

Case in point: watched what was supposed to be a dirt simple
fixture swap turn into the electrician fighting for three
hours with too-short K&T, a non-existant box, too small hole,
etc. The alternative (new wire) would have taken over a day.
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.

Posted by Mark Lloyd on September 18, 2006, 2:13 pm
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:35:55 -0000, clewis@nortelnetworks.com (Chris
Lewis) wrote:

>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:26:49 -0000, clewis@nortelnetworks.com (Chris
>> Lewis) wrote:
>
>> >> As a customer, I would consider it unreasonable to get a phone
>> >> estimate for one thing, then expect additional work for the same
>> >> amount.
>
>> >Me neither.
>
>> >However, the question is what is that "one thing"?
>
>> >You get an over the phone estimate for $50 to hang a new fixture.
>> >The electrician arrives, and discovers that the support point
>> >has rotted out, the wire's insulation is falling off and is half
>> >melted, and it'll require routing a new circuit, with wall
>> >teardown and fishing thru a muddy crawlspace.
>> >
>> >"You said you'd do it for $50".
>>
>> I would know that that $50 is an ESTIMATE (certainly not a guaranteed
>> amount) that couldn't possibly include unknowns.
>
>_You_ would, but not everyone is that reasonable.
>

And the rest of that is something I've had to get used to. You have to
suffer for the failings of others. In this case, that's not getting
the estimate because OTHER PEOPLE misuse it.

>Furthermore, that's not how the courts interpret "estimates", and
>the trades are compelled to treat them the same way.
>
>As guaranteed amounts. Think "car repair estimates" most jurisdictions
>consider those to be _firm_ upper limits.
>
>I'd also suggest that in renovations (rather than new construction),
>"ballpark estimates" (where you tell the tradesperson UP FRONT that
>you're only using the number for budgetary purposes, and would
>get them to give you a more accurate estimate on inspection)
>often vary so wildly as to be _useless_. Because of the infamous
>"jackpot!" problem.
>
>Case in point: watched what was supposed to be a dirt simple
>fixture swap turn into the electrician fighting for three
>hours with too-short K&T, a non-existant box, too small hole,
>etc. The alternative (new wire) would have taken over a day.
--
98 days until the winter solstice celebration

Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com

"God was invented by man for a reason, that
reason is no longer applicable."

Posted by Eigenvector on September 16, 2006, 6:15 pm

> Eigenvector wrote:
>>> I doubt very very much that job would take 27 hours of work. I am far
>>> from an expert, but based on electrical work that I have had done, I
>>> would
>>> think that "ballpark" time required would be 10 hours, or a bill of
>>> $910
>>> at the quoted rate. Even going to 15 hours would be only $1,365, but
>>> that seems very high to me.
>>>
>>> Now that I think of it, if they couldn't do the job in 10 hours or less,
>>> I
>>> would question their experience.
>>>
>>> Of course, you know the best course of action now is to quickly get
>>> several
>>> more estimates.
>>>
>>>
>>> --James--
>>>
>> That's the problem, all I've been hearing all day is "Sorry we don't give
>> estimates over the phone. <click>" Hmm.
>
> So I give you an estimate over the phone of fifty dollars to install your
> replacement kitchen fixture. I arrive and you present me with a ceiling
> fan that you expect to have installed for the aforementioned fifty
> dollars. The existing, sixty year old, three and one half inch, round,
> ear less, box offers no way to support a new lighting fixture, let alone a
> ceiling fan but you expect me to replace the box with one listed for fan
> support, do all my own cut patch and clean up, assemble and install a
> ceiling fan, all for fifty dollars. If I gave telephone estimates; which
> I do not; I would tell you that it is a time and materials job not to
> exceed five hundred dollars excluding the cost of any new wiring needed in
> your home. You would call me a name and hang up.
>
> I recently gave a family an estimate of $2000 for a heavy up from 150 to
> 400 amperes specifically at the existing service location. I excluded
> compliance with any unpublished portion of the utilities tariffs. The
> power company would not supply service to the existing meter location
> after the county electrical inspector had signed off on the completed
> work. Would you expect me to extend the service entry conductors, provide
> and install main lug kits and main breaker enclosures, and provide
> temporary service disconnect for the existing supply without any
> additional compensation? Just what are my kids supposed to eat that week?
> --
> Tom Horne
>


It doesn't seem unreasonable to get a base estimate ahead of time to me. We
aren't talking about a $100 job, we're talking a potentially multi-thousand
dollar task. People don't have that kind of money floating around. As the
person paying, I fully feel entitled to know that ahead of time - otherwise
how do you know I'll be able to pay you? There's nothing wrong with asking
over the phone for an estimate of the costs.

You don't go to a car dealership, take a test drive, have the salesman show
you the works, get to sign the paperwork, then look at the price and walk
away - "sorry I can't afford this." You need to have a reasonable idea of
what it costs first. How do is that accomplished you ask????? TV ads,
sticker in the window, website, etc.

As to your question, I would expect to pay you for the work you did,
irregardless of what you quoted me. I think you get the impression I'm
penny pinching or trying to cheat someone here - not at all. But even if I
was, what do you care - you're gonna charge what you're gonna charge
regardless of whether or not I'm wheelin' and dealin'. Isn't it in your
best interest to be forthright with your rates and estimates ahead of time,
if only because it wards off the skinflints?

Doesn't matter to me now, I already have a contractor picked out and am
going to set something up with him on Thursday. Why did I pick him, I know
his company from previous work they did for my employer AND BECAUSE HE GAVE
ME A ROUGH ESTIMATE OVER THE PHONE. He politely understood why I was
asking.



Page 3 of 10       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Ball Park of Plumbing job September 25, 2006, 5:33 am
Ball Park Estimate April 1, 2008, 3:47 pm
Ball Park Pricing for Luxaire G9V May 24, 2006, 10:49 pm
Ball Park estimate for repair of GE Refrigerator Compressor November 15, 2006, 11:28 pm
Ball Replacement January 2, 2007, 2:37 am
Replacing A Circuit Breaker Box With A New One: Cost ? August 6, 2005, 10:52 am
Cost to replace FPE circuit breaker box February 23, 2007, 12:08 pm
cost of skylight replacement? May 21, 2006, 6:50 pm
Cost of deck replacement May 15, 2007, 4:50 pm
Cost for secondary breaker panel in garage January 24, 2007, 12:10 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap