Home Page link

Breaker panel, code for height from floor - Page 3

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Breaker panel, code for height from floor Existential Angst 10-26-2009
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Wayne Whitney on October 27, 2009, 12:56 pm



> Errrr, I wouldn't let the guru go just yet. He was close enough for
> spit, and I have to look stuff up to verify. I remembered the 6' 6"
> working space, but when someone posted the 6' 7" breaker height, that
> seemed odd so I had to look it up.

I'm the guilty party. :-)

In both cases the 2008 NEC says 2 meters. So this is just an example
of standardizing on metric and and two different code writing
committees using different rounding practices. In both cases the
rounding practice is to minimize the restriction.

Cheers, Wayne

Posted by RicodJour on October 27, 2009, 1:43 pm


> > Errrr, I wouldn't let the guru go just yet. =A0He was close enough for
> > spit, and I have to look stuff up to verify. =A0I remembered the 6' 6"
> > working space, but when someone posted the 6' 7" breaker height, that
> > seemed odd so I had to look it up. =A0
> I'm the guilty party. =A0:-)
> In both cases the 2008 NEC says 2 meters. =A0So this is just an example
> of standardizing on metric and and two different code writing
> committees using different rounding practices. =A0In both cases the
> rounding practice is to minimize the restriction.

Interesting. Thanks for clarifying that, Wayne.

R

Posted by DD_BobK on October 28, 2009, 1:45 am


> > > > > I know that the NEC code (and NYC code) specifies that a "standar=
d" wall
> > > > > outlet can't be below X inches above the floor -- 4" (at one time=
), iirc.
> > > > > Is there a similar code for breaker panels? =A0And is there a *ma=
ximum* height
> > > > > above the floor, as well?
> > > > > Curious as to what the various codes are in various locales, esp.=
in
> > > > > NYC/Westchester.
> > > > I just happened to ask my own personal NEC code guru this very
> > > > question. =A0:)
> > > > the answer
> > > > no minimum height, max is 6' 6"
> > > > with a 30" x 30" x 6' 6" volume clear (no fixed objects) in front t=
he
> > > > panel.
> > > Hmmm, the 06 IRC and the 05 NEC seem to be in agreement according to
> > > my stuff, and they're a bit different from what your guru told you.
> > > The maximum height of the breaker is 6' 7" and the minimum height of
> > > the working space is 6' 6" x 30" wide by 36" deep.
> > Looks like I need a new guru (or one with a better memory).....
> > Now I know who to ask for answers to my electrical questions. =A0 :)
> Errrr, I wouldn't let the guru go just yet. =A0He was close enough for
> spit, and I have to look stuff up to verify. =A0I remembered the 6' 6"
> working space, but when someone posted the 6' 7" breaker height, that
> seemed odd so I had to look it up. =A0I wonder why they wouldn't just
> make both requirements the same number? =A0Needless fussing for an
> inch. =A0An inch hardly matters...most of the time!
> R

I was just kidding and attempting to protect the identity of my
electrical guru..... who has since self confessed.

The info was more than "close enough" for me. I assume the intent is
to provide a "man sized" volume from which to address the panel and to
have the volume deep enough such that the worker isnt jammed up
against the panel...ie arm's length plus some play.

Since the code now says 2 meters that would be 78 3/4" (78.740") or 6'
6 3/4"

...btw what is the tolerance on that 2 meter dimension? :) +/- .1
meter? .01 meter? .001 meter?

cheers
Bob


Posted by RicodJour on October 28, 2009, 9:26 am


> I was just kidding and attempting to protect the identity of my
> electrical guru..... who has since self confessed.
> The info was more than "close enough" for me. =A0I assume the intent is
> to provide a "man sized" volume from which to address the panel and to
> have the volume deep enough such that the worker isnt jammed up
> against the panel...ie arm's length plus some play.

That makes sense and explains why the "man-sized" volume has gone up
in width from 30" to 36". I thought the plumbers were the fat ones
(and before any plumbers take umbrage - you know you're fat so stop
being so defensive). I guess the electricians are catching up. If
this trend continues they're going to have to widen doorways!

R

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Extending a Breaker Panel. September 9, 2005, 12:58 pm
Breaker Panel....Neutral bus March 11, 2006, 8:03 pm
Found something odd in my breaker panel October 5, 2006, 4:59 pm
200 amp main panel with 100 amp breaker May 27, 2008, 8:39 am
Breaker panel questions May 19, 2009, 8:49 pm
Half of breaker panel hot, the other dead!?! September 22, 2006, 11:28 pm
Circuit breaker panel question December 12, 2006, 5:21 pm
Circuit Breaker Panel Question December 12, 2007, 12:14 pm
Breaker Panel 220V problem January 6, 2008, 3:38 pm
30A breaker feeding a 100A sub-panel? February 27, 2008, 4:32 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap