Home Page link

Clean burning wood - is this a pipedream? - Page 3

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3 Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Clean burning wood - is this a pipedream? Dan Musicant 10-24-2009
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Dan Musicant on October 25, 2009, 8:09 pm


On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT), Harry K

:> LouB wrote:
:> > Wayne Whitney wrote:
:>
:> >>> Wayne, are you there? Wayne Whitney who traffics this newsgroup
:>
:> >> Yo!  My trafficking is fairly irregular these days, it was chance
:> >> that I noticed your post.
:>
:> >>> told me that fireplaces release particulate matter which has been
:> >>> shown to shorten one life.
:>
:> >> Right, but most of those are emitted outside, so you'd be shortening
:> >> your neighbor's lives, not your own.  Of course, if your fireplace
:> >> has a drafting problem, you could get smoke and particulates inside.
:>
:> >> The best option pollution wise is to get an EPA-certified wood
:> >> burning insert in your fireplace.  They have some form of
:> >> afterburner or catalyst to burn wood more cleanly.  Plus you could
:> >> improve the efficiency of using the fireplace to heat the house, as
:> >> you should be able to arrange to use outside air for combustion and
:> >> just blow the heat into the house.  Much more efficient than a
:> >> conventional fireplace.
:>
:> >> However, the expense of the insert and/or necessary chimney
:> >> improvements or liners may be prohibitive.
:>
:> >> Cheers, Wayne
:> > Thia Old House just had a show with that.  Inserts are expensive!
:>
:> I bought my EPA certified insert with most of the stainless chimney liner used
:> for $300. Replaced the "afterburner" tubes in the top for $40 or something
like
:> that. There are ways.
:>
:> It heats well, and rarely has visible smoke after the initial few minutes.
:>
:> And I get way more heat from it, and less heat loss up the chimney then a
:> fireplace could ever provide.- Hide quoted text -
:>
:> - Show quoted text -
:
:True about the efficiency. Of course _anything_ is more effectient
:than a fireplace. They are the most efficient wasters of wood known
:to man...well, an open pit would be worse I suppose.
:
:Harry K

I should have snagged my sister's wood burning stove when she gave that
away and went to strictly gas furnace heating in her house. Not sure I
could have set it up, maybe could have vented it up the chimney. My
fireplace is downstairs, of course, in a two story house.

Dan


Email: dmusicant at pacbell dot net

Posted by Bob F on October 26, 2009, 2:51 pm


Dan Musicant wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
>>> LouB wrote:
>>>> Wayne Whitney wrote:
>>>>>> Wayne, are you there? Wayne Whitney who traffics this newsgroup
>>>>> Yo! My trafficking is fairly irregular these days, it was chance
>>>>> that I noticed your post.
>>>>>> told me that fireplaces release particulate matter which has been
>>>>>> shown to shorten one life.
>>>>> Right, but most of those are emitted outside, so you'd be
>>>>> shortening your neighbor's lives, not your own. Of course, if
>>>>> your fireplace has a drafting problem, you could get smoke and
>>>>> particulates inside.
>>>>> The best option pollution wise is to get an EPA-certified wood
>>>>> burning insert in your fireplace. They have some form of
>>>>> afterburner or catalyst to burn wood more cleanly. Plus you could
>>>>> improve the efficiency of using the fireplace to heat the house,
>>>>> as you should be able to arrange to use outside air for
>>>>> combustion and just blow the heat into the house. Much more
>>>>> efficient than a conventional fireplace.
>>>>> However, the expense of the insert and/or necessary chimney
>>>>> improvements or liners may be prohibitive.
>>>>> Cheers, Wayne
>>>> Thia Old House just had a show with that. Inserts are expensive!
>>> I bought my EPA certified insert with most of the stainless chimney
>>> liner used for $300. Replaced the "afterburner" tubes in the top
>>> for $40 or something like that. There are ways.
>>> It heats well, and rarely has visible smoke after the initial few
>>> minutes.
>>> And I get way more heat from it, and less heat loss up the chimney
>>> then a fireplace could ever provide.- Hide quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> True about the efficiency. Of course _anything_ is more effectient
>> than a fireplace. They are the most efficient wasters of wood known
>> to man...well, an open pit would be worse I suppose.
>> Harry K
> I should have snagged my sister's wood burning stove when she gave
> that away and went to strictly gas furnace heating in her house. Not
> sure I could have set it up, maybe could have vented it up the
> chimney. My fireplace is downstairs, of course, in a two story house.

Legally in the US, at least in many places, any woodstove or insert that is
installed has to be an EPA certified unit. Older ones are no longer legal for
installation or re-instalation. You need to make sure that any unit you get
meets that requirement, or you could have legal or insurance problems. Permits
may be required for instalation.

Thus, it may be illegal to remove an insert for chimney cleaning and later
re-install it, and you won't be able to hire a ligit chimney cleaner to do this.



Posted by Dan Musicant on November 2, 2009, 11:34 am



:Dan Musicant wrote:
:> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
:>
:>>> LouB wrote:
:>>>> Wayne Whitney wrote:
:>>>
:>>>>>> Wayne, are you there? Wayne Whitney who traffics this newsgroup
:>>>
:>>>>> Yo! My trafficking is fairly irregular these days, it was chance
:>>>>> that I noticed your post.
:>>>
:>>>>>> told me that fireplaces release particulate matter which has been
:>>>>>> shown to shorten one life.
:>>>
:>>>>> Right, but most of those are emitted outside, so you'd be
:>>>>> shortening your neighbor's lives, not your own. Of course, if
:>>>>> your fireplace has a drafting problem, you could get smoke and
:>>>>> particulates inside.
:>>>
:>>>>> The best option pollution wise is to get an EPA-certified wood
:>>>>> burning insert in your fireplace. They have some form of
:>>>>> afterburner or catalyst to burn wood more cleanly. Plus you could
:>>>>> improve the efficiency of using the fireplace to heat the house,
:>>>>> as you should be able to arrange to use outside air for
:>>>>> combustion and just blow the heat into the house. Much more
:>>>>> efficient than a conventional fireplace.
:>>>
:>>>>> However, the expense of the insert and/or necessary chimney
:>>>>> improvements or liners may be prohibitive.
:>>>
:>>>>> Cheers, Wayne
:>>>> Thia Old House just had a show with that. Inserts are expensive!
:>>>
:>>> I bought my EPA certified insert with most of the stainless chimney
:>>> liner used for $300. Replaced the "afterburner" tubes in the top
:>>> for $40 or something like that. There are ways.
:>>>
:>>> It heats well, and rarely has visible smoke after the initial few
:>>> minutes.
:>>>
:>>> And I get way more heat from it, and less heat loss up the chimney
:>>> then a fireplace could ever provide.- Hide quoted text -
:>>>
:>>> - Show quoted text -
:>>
:>> True about the efficiency. Of course _anything_ is more effectient
:>> than a fireplace. They are the most efficient wasters of wood known
:>> to man...well, an open pit would be worse I suppose.
:>>
:>> Harry K
:>
:> I should have snagged my sister's wood burning stove when she gave
:> that away and went to strictly gas furnace heating in her house. Not
:> sure I could have set it up, maybe could have vented it up the
:> chimney. My fireplace is downstairs, of course, in a two story house.
:
:Legally in the US, at least in many places, any woodstove or insert that is
:installed has to be an EPA certified unit. Older ones are no longer legal for
:installation or re-instalation. You need to make sure that any unit you get
:meets that requirement, or you could have legal or insurance problems. Permits
:may be required for instalation.
:
:Thus, it may be illegal to remove an insert for chimney cleaning and later
:re-install it, and you won't be able to hire a ligit chimney cleaner to do this.
:
I guess I'll just wear a lot of clothes this winter, drink hot broth,
take a hot shower... I figure my chimney's clogged.


Email: dmusicant at pacbell dot net

Posted by cshenk on November 2, 2009, 6:55 pm


"Dan Musicant" wrote
> "Bob F" wrote:

> :Legally in the US, at least in many places, any woodstove or insert that
> is
> :installed has to be an EPA certified unit. Older ones are no longer legal
> for

> I guess I'll just wear a lot of clothes this winter, drink hot broth,
> take a hot shower... I figure my chimney's clogged.

Relax Dan, just have it cleaned regular like normal folks do. Your car
emits more bad stuff in a week than your fireplace does in a year.


Page 3 of 3       << first < 1 2 3
Similar ThreadsPosted
Wood for Burning August 11, 2006, 10:04 am
Wood burning January 24, 2009, 9:27 am
Gas fire and wood burning January 20, 2006, 1:01 pm
Wood burning pollutin February 16, 2009, 5:37 pm
Wood Burning Stove Clearances September 14, 2005, 1:14 am
Burning Pressure Treated Wood October 17, 2005, 8:10 pm
Insulate wood-burning fireplace December 17, 2007, 2:04 pm
Lynndale Wood Burning Furance December 31, 2007, 10:47 am
Burning pellets in a normal wood stove? September 22, 2006, 11:02 pm
Attaching gaskets to wood burning stove doors ? December 22, 2006, 7:57 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap