Home Page link

Compact Florescent lamp trick - Page 7

Home Repair - - If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Otherwise look here. 

Page 7 of 10       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Compact Florescent lamp trick JIMMIE 10-16-2009
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by Tony on October 17, 2009, 7:25 pm


aemeijers wrote:
> Tony wrote:
>> aemeijers wrote:
>>> Tony wrote:
>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>> On Fri 16 Oct 2009 04:53:00p, David Nebenzahl told us...
>>>>>> On 10/16/2009 4:20 PM Nate Nagel spake thus:
>>>>>>> yes, and "candelabra base" is the correct term. "Edison base" is
>>>>>>> the standard light bulb that we all know and love, "Mogul base"
>>>>>>> is the size larger than that that you hardly ever see anymore.
>>>>>> Well, you (and I) don't see mogul bases much anymore, but anyone
>>>>>> who deals with commercial or industrial lighting sees them a *lot*.
>>>>> Most mogul base bulbs for residential use were 3-way builbs used as
>>>>> the center bulb in floor lamps. They were particularly common in
>>>>> the 1940s-
>>>>> 1950s. Usually the central mogul base bulb was surrounded by 3
>>>>> edison base sockets with a3-way switche to turn on 1, 2, or all 3
>>>>> bulbs. The mogul had it's own 3-way switch to handle the double
>>>>> filaments.
>>>> So back in the 50's the "lamp dimming" technology to dim lights and
>>>> use less power was far, far superior to the modern use of "Dimmer
>>>> Switches". That figures! (I'd like to find one of those lamps.)
>>>> At my last home I rewired the lights on the ceiling fans. I made it
>>>> so the first pull on the chain turned on two opposite bulbs (25
>>>> watt), the next pull turned them off and turned on the other two
>>>> sockets (with 60 watt bulbs), the third pull turned on all four
>>>> sockets/bulbs. Much more efficient than a dimmer switch.
>>> Speaking of the 1950s (and up into the 60s)- remember those living
>>> room pole lamps with multiple heads growing off them? Some of them
>>> were even spring-loaded to go between floor and ceiling without
>>> having to have a huge base. Common use was in the 'Dagwood and
>>> Blondie' corner of the living room, with the 2 big chairs, so each
>>> person could have light on what they were reading. 3rd head was
>>> usually bounced off ceiling, or just ignored. I think my grandparents
>>> wore out about three of them. He was a retired EE, so he would switch
>>> parts around to keep the important parts working.
>> Funny, I was just thinking about them last week and pictured the
>> spring loaded one we had when I was a kid! I think I may have seen
>> one on TV and that jarred my memory.
>> How about the adjustable height dining room light? It had an egg
>> shaped spring loaded center part to coil up the wire inside if you
>> were to raise it up. You simply grabbed the light and pulled it down
>> or pushed it up and the spring loaded wire would hold it there...
>> until it got old.
>
> Was the one your family had antique brass or copper colored? There may
> have been others, but those stick in my mind. My family's 1956 house had
> one of those in copper, to go with the Real Wood cherry cabinets, but
> the 1966 house had a very futuristic flying saucer lamp on a
> brush-nickel colored down pipe. The real dining table used 90% of the
> time, a table-height peninsula in the kitchen, had focused cans above it.
>
> That 1966 house was great, my old man's big dream for his family. Too
> bad we couldn't afford it (68-70 being real bad years for custom
> builders), and ended up elsewhere by 72. If I was to hit the lotto, I
> believe I would knock on the door and make the current owners an offer
> for it. I drive by once a year or so, when I happen to be in that town.
> They have changed a few things, but they haven't mucked it up too bad,
> other than a hideous front door. I wonder if my key still fits the door?
> Probably best that I'll never know, I guess. Reality can never live up
> to memories.

In the pull down light I picture the egg,spring,cord holder as bright
brass plated with spots where the clear finish didn't hold up. The
light itself was sort of like a flying saucer metal on top and I think
frosted glass on the bottom, and I think instead of the normal screw on
part to hold the glass, it was made so you could grab it with your
finger to pull it down. The top part had a design made with little
holes in the metal that let a small amount of light out.

Posted by Bob Villa on October 16, 2009, 9:17 pm


>yes, and "candelabra base" is the correct term. "Edison base" is the
standard light bulb that we all know and love, "Mogul base" is the
size
larger than that that you hardly ever see anymore.

nate

I know the Edison base as a "medium base". (No slight meant to
Edison) And you still see Mogal base on Mercury vapor exterior
lighting.

bob_v

Posted by Tony on October 17, 2009, 11:20 am


Bob Villa wrote:
>> yes, and "candelabra base" is the correct term. "Edison base" is the
> standard light bulb that we all know and love, "Mogul base" is the
> size
> larger than that that you hardly ever see anymore.
>
> nate
>
> I know the Edison base as a "medium base". (No slight meant to
> Edison) And you still see Mogal base on Mercury vapor exterior
> lighting.

And if you can find those giant 200 or 300 watt incandescent bulbs they
have the the large base.

Posted by Mark Lloyd on October 17, 2009, 6:44 pm


wrote:

>Bob Villa wrote:
>>> yes, and "candelabra base" is the correct term. "Edison base" is the
>> standard light bulb that we all know and love, "Mogul base" is the
>> size
>> larger than that that you hardly ever see anymore.
>>
>> nate
>>
>> I know the Edison base as a "medium base". (No slight meant to
>> Edison) And you still see Mogal base on Mercury vapor exterior
>> lighting.
>And if you can find those giant 200 or 300 watt incandescent bulbs they
>have the the large base.

I have seen a 200W bulb in about 1978. It had a standard base. About
the same time I found a 1000W bulb, which did have a mogul base. I
gave off a lot of heat too.
--
69 days until the winter solstice celebration

Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us

"How could you ask me to believe in God when there's
absolutely no evidence that I can see?" -- Jodie Foster

Posted by Don Klipstein on October 19, 2009, 6:52 pm


>wrote:
>>Bob Villa wrote:
>>>> yes, and "candelabra base" is the correct term. "Edison base" is the
>>> standard light bulb that we all know and love, "Mogul base" is the
>>> size
>>> larger than that that you hardly ever see anymore.
>>>
>>> nate
>>>
>>> I know the Edison base as a "medium base". (No slight meant to
>>> Edison) And you still see Mogal base on Mercury vapor exterior
>>> lighting.
>>And if you can find those giant 200 or 300 watt incandescent bulbs they
>>have the the large base.
>I have seen a 200W bulb in about 1978. It had a standard base. About
>the same time I found a 1000W bulb, which did have a mogul base. I
>gave off a lot of heat too.

My experience in USA is that 200 and 300 watt 120V single-filament
incandescents and 50-200-250 watt 3-way ones tend to have medium bases.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

Page 7 of 10       < 1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Looking for facts about fires caused by compact florescent bulbs September 19, 2007, 3:43 pm
Explain this - 4 bulb light fixture wouldn't work with Compact Florescent bulbs November 30, 2008, 3:23 am
is there a trick to getting nails out? July 19, 2005, 11:51 am
Old dog learns a new trick. January 14, 2006, 6:58 am
All florescent lights out October 13, 2007, 11:31 am
florescent light January 21, 2009, 10:16 am
Walmart, and the identical box trick October 10, 2007, 1:47 pm
Getting rid of Trick or Treaters - Permanently October 31, 2008, 11:38 pm
florescent bulbs and timers? October 29, 2006, 9:38 am
florescent bulb colors June 13, 2007, 8:18 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap